I thought I'd start this WIKI as I need a place to find the references to GOOD SCIENCE.

However! This is not to try and sway YOU either way, but to give you access to information that is being ignored by the mass media and one publicly funded TV corporation in particular!

Read and make up your own mind!!

I'll start with some links (MOSTLY!)Provided by Turbobloke.

31/5/2017
Arctic Sea Ice extent is 800,000 km2 higher than it was in 2016
https://sunshinehours.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/...

Added 8/12/11 Ice FLows and why they speed up and slow down.
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/OllierPaine-NoIceS...
Also an A-Z of every aspect of issue
http://cfact.org/pdf/ClimateDepot_A-Z_ClimateReali...
And a nice article supporting the critique of the Hockey Stick statistics used.
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/Climate_...



ADDED 4/3/2011
One of the loudest shouts about Man Made Climate Change is that we will all be washed away buy sea level rising! So please read this, as the author IS the WORLD EXPERT on the subject.
Never heard of him? I wonder why?
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202...



Added - 1st August - Well worth reading!!
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate...
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05...
Latest NAIL in the CO2 coffin!
http://www.examiner.com/x-32936-Seminole-County-En...

IPCC Reports being corrupted!!
http://www.tech-know.eu/uploads/Spinning_the_Clima...

and again...

The UN IPCC's Artful Bias - Glaring Omissions, False Confidence and Misleading Statistics in the Summary for Policymakers. by David E. Wojick, Ph.D.
http://www.john-daly.com/guests/un_ipcc.htm

IPCC Reports supported by 4000 Scientist/Experts??? No 60!
http://mclean.ch/climate/docs/IPCC_numbers.pdf

The Truth about Al Gores Film
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerr...
Added 26-01-2010

Polar Bears
Professor J. Scott Armstrong of the Wharton School says, “To list a species that is currently in good health as an endangered species requires valid forecasts that its population would decline to levels that threaten its viability. In fact, the polar bear populations have been increasing rapidly in recent decades due to hunting restrictions. Assuming these restrictions remain, the most appropriate forecast is to assume that the upward trend would continue for a few years, then level off.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/08050...


Antarctic Polar Ice
Growing not shrinking (27 billion tonnes / year according to Joughin and Tulaczyk, also Wingham et al, in two separate studies).
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/17/revealed-ant...

Antarctic Temperature Data Corruption
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/ghcn-a...

Arctic Polar Ice
Growing not shrinking, arctic sea ice is increasing at a record rate.
http://www.eco-can.ca/eco-news/2009/1/5/arctic-ice...

Glaciers and icecaps not collapsing
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/OllierPaine-NoIceS...

The global warming doomsday writers claim the ice sheets are melting catastrophically, and will cause a sudden rise in sea level of many metres. This ignores the mechanism of glacier flow which is by creep: glaciers are not melting from the surface down, nor are they sliding down an inclined plane lubricated by meltwater. The existence of ice over 3 km thick preserving details of past snowfall and atmospheres, used to decipher past temperature and CO2 levels, shows that the ice sheets have accumulated for hundreds of thousands of years without melting. Variations in melting around the edges of ice sheets are no indication that they are collapsing. Indeed 'collapse' is impossible.

ADDED 17-01-2010
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/...

Indian Gov MoEF report on Himalayan Glaciers
http://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/Mo...


Carbon dioxide
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef800581r
With the short (5−15 year) RT meaning CO2 residence time results shown to be in quasi-equilibrium, this then supports the (independently based) conclusion that the long-term (100 year) rising atmospheric CO2 concentration is not from anthropogenic sources but, in accordance with conclusions from other studies, is most likely the outcome of the rising atmospheric temperature, which is due to other natural factors. This further supports the conclusion that global warming is not anthropogenically driven as an outcome of combustion. The economic and political significance of that conclusion will be self-evident.

Falsification of the Impact of CO2!
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Falsification_of_C...

HOW MUCH CO2 CAN WE TAKE? Well actually a whole lot more will do nothing!




Sun and climate
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12316782.300...
A 22-YEAR cycle linked with changes in the Sun's activity has influenced trends in temperature this century more than any other factor. This is the conclusion of Nicholas Newell, a (MIT) scientist in Arlington, Massachusetts.

Recent paper: Mouel et al provide scientific evidence for the dominant role of solar activity and cosmic rays in natural climate change.
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics - Jean-Louis Le Mouël, Elena Blanter, Mikhail Shnirman, and Vincent Courtillot: ‘Evidence for solar forcing in variability of temperatures and pressures in Europe.’

NASA Says "It's the Sun" AT LAST!
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/coolingt...

MORE SUN DATA
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/07/suns-magneti...

IMPACT ON USA!
http://westinstenv.org/wp-content/Solar_Arch_NY_Ma...

USA TEMPERATURE DATA MANIPULATION!!!
If your an American TAX PAYER, you need to watch the video on this link!
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/8155921...

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate...

Floods
http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/11/normalized-...
No global warming signal in European floods - from a study of 31 countries over 37 years.

UK sporadic floods not linked to climate change - UK Centre for Ecology and Hrydrology. Example - lead author, Terry Marsh, comments: “The river floods of summer 2007 were a very singular episode, which does not form part of any clear historical trend or show consistency with currently favoured climate change scenarios.”

Sea Level changes
Convenient chart with appropriate timescale.
http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/sea%...

Carbon here's something on the realist positive side from Prof Brignell at Numberwatch.
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/Carbon.htm

Ocean Acidification??? NO it's still Alkaline!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/31/ocean-acidif...
http://www.co2science.org/subject/o/oceanacidifica...

Political Claptrap??
http://www.abd.org.uk/blair.htm


Problem of Venice Sinking!
http://venicexplorer.net/observer/images/maree-ven...

The Global Warming Policy Foundation
http://www.thegwpf.org/
The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is an all-party and non-party think tank and a registered educational charity.
Our main purpose is to bring reason, integrity and balance to a debate that has become seriously unbalanced, irrationally alarmist, and all too often depressingly intolerant.
The GWPF's primary purpose is to help restore balance and trust in the climate debate that is frequently distorted by prejudice and exaggeration.
Our main focus is to analyse global warming policies and its economic and other implications. Our aim is to provide the most robust and reliable economic analysis and advice.
We intend to develop alternative policy options and to foster a proper debate (which at present scarcely exists) on the likely cost and consequences of current policies.
We are funded entirely by voluntary donations from a number of private individuals and charitable trusts. In order to make clear its complete independence, it does not accept gifts from either energy companies or anyone with a significant interest in an energy company.


http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_cl...
History and info on Paleoclimates, CO2 concentrations and average temperatures.
" There has historically been much more CO2 in our atmosphere than exists today. For example, during the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today. The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm -- about 18 times higher than today.

The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm. According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming."

Blue Meanie's Climategate megalink:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/inde...

(The quite frankly awesome Blue Meanie has also copied all those links to a word document, which can be downloaded here
http://web.mac.com/blue_meanie1976/hi/Docs.html

Enjoy! There are 243 pages of links, pics, videos, and so on... Always worth having on your computer I'm sure!)

Good to see the Wiki is still being updated. One more which looks to be an addition:
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/p...

NOAA satellite error - decade of glboal temepratures corrupted and over-estimated:
http://www.climatechangefraud.com/climate-reports/...

Climate change: A guide for the perplexed
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11462-climat...

NASA's guide to causes of climate change
http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

The above two links don't help to fight the con they perpetuate it so ought not to be in this document given the title. (What about Opinion vs. Fact TB? Like an opinion that MMGW is a con?- G_T) You ought to start your own wiki "Climate cons to fight the facts" rather than pollute this one, it might heat up.

Report on the whitewash inquiries into Climategate
http://www.thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports...

Climate change deniers vs. Scientific consensus (Arguements vs. counterarguements):
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizatio...







12/02/2011 Added some more links -Links provided courtesy of Turbobloke
AGAIN These are provided by TB for YOU to investigate and MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND!!


Computer climate models are at the heart of the problem of global warming predictions:

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/BALLComputerModels...

Computer climate models are still unreliable, new study warns

http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/15721/G...

A fundamental failure of current climate models

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1091103/p...

The (lack of) validation of IPCC computer climate models

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/IPCCvalid.htm

Backcasting of climate models does not work

http://www.applet-magic.com/backcasting.htm

Santer et-17-al models fail to be confirmed by observations

http://joannenova.com.au/2008/10/30/not-found-the-...

Both climate models used in the USNA were worse than no model at all, worse than random numbers

http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/energy/projectregionalc...

The models are the vehicles used to bamboozle the public and create the illusion they know what is going on

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/20757

The broken peer review process

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/a_climatolo...

http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/15/boundary-layer-...

Insider view of IPCC operations

http://nofrakkingconsensus.wordpress.com/category/...

http://reviewipcc.interacademycouncil.net/Comments...