The Spy Swap...

Author
Discussion

tybo

2,284 posts

218 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Globulator said:
Jimbeaux said:
Those questions have been beaten to death on other looney theory threads, go find them yourselves. I will not contribute to other PHer's torture. Go sell sell crazy somewhere else Slick, we are all stocked up here.
BTW, the lowest form of "debate" is to change others' quotes to your words.
So no answers, and no - I haven't found your beliefs explained elsewhere BTW, either on a looney "WTC7 fell down because of a hard stare" thread or a looney "Bearded man on a hill masterminds multiple hijacks for hours with zero resistance". Perhaps you know where the missing plane at the pentagon (when everyone was away) went, where the missing plane in a field is that no one saw is, and why two aeroplane proof trade centre buildings were downed, why WTC7 (that no one touched) came down on schedule, and why no analysis of these building failures has ever been allowed, and why the Bush cabal was so obstructive to the 9/11 enquiry.

And you call me crazy for believing my own eyes over the contradictory ramblings of leaders that lied to us over Iraq?

FFS Jimbo, you want us to be naive over 9/11 but cynical over Climate Change? Not gonna happen mate, it's irrational. Lies are lies, cover ups are cover ups regardless of the subject, sorry - that's just the way it is.

And back to the thread's original subject: Yes - I think this playing spies crap is just some budget hunting, the timing and pathetic-ness of their 'activities' means some federal agency just decided to dust off the file and get some cheap publicity in order to look busy. Frankly apart from the FBI I'd fire them all and save a bundle.
This is genuinely hilarious! hehe
Yeah, really hilarious. Especially that Youtube vid of your leaders blatently lying to you. confused
Another one; this is a red letter day! hehehehe

Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 13th July 15:05
Oh, sorry, are they not?

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Globulator said:
Jimbeaux said:
Those questions have been beaten to death on other looney theory threads, go find them yourselves. I will not contribute to other PHer's torture. Go sell sell crazy somewhere else Slick, we are all stocked up here.
BTW, the lowest form of "debate" is to change others' quotes to your words.
So no answers, and no - I haven't found your beliefs explained elsewhere BTW, either on a looney "WTC7 fell down because of a hard stare" thread or a looney "Bearded man on a hill masterminds multiple hijacks for hours with zero resistance". Perhaps you know where the missing plane at the pentagon (when everyone was away) went, where the missing plane in a field is that no one saw is, and why two aeroplane proof trade centre buildings were downed, why WTC7 (that no one touched) came down on schedule, and why no analysis of these building failures has ever been allowed, and why the Bush cabal was so obstructive to the 9/11 enquiry.

And you call me crazy for believing my own eyes over the contradictory ramblings of leaders that lied to us over Iraq?

FFS Jimbo, you want us to be naive over 9/11 but cynical over Climate Change? Not gonna happen mate, it's irrational. Lies are lies, cover ups are cover ups regardless of the subject, sorry - that's just the way it is.

And back to the thread's original subject: Yes - I think this playing spies crap is just some budget hunting, the timing and pathetic-ness of their 'activities' means some federal agency just decided to dust off the file and get some cheap publicity in order to look busy. Frankly apart from the FBI I'd fire them all and save a bundle.
This is genuinely hilarious! hehe
Yeah, really hilarious. Especially that Youtube vid of your leaders blatently lying to you. confused
Another one; this is a red letter day! hehehehe

Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 13th July 15:05
Oh, sorry, are they not?
If you say so, but of course! hehe

tybo

2,284 posts

218 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Globulator said:
Jimbeaux said:
Those questions have been beaten to death on other looney theory threads, go find them yourselves. I will not contribute to other PHer's torture. Go sell sell crazy somewhere else Slick, we are all stocked up here.
BTW, the lowest form of "debate" is to change others' quotes to your words.
So no answers, and no - I haven't found your beliefs explained elsewhere BTW, either on a looney "WTC7 fell down because of a hard stare" thread or a looney "Bearded man on a hill masterminds multiple hijacks for hours with zero resistance". Perhaps you know where the missing plane at the pentagon (when everyone was away) went, where the missing plane in a field is that no one saw is, and why two aeroplane proof trade centre buildings were downed, why WTC7 (that no one touched) came down on schedule, and why no analysis of these building failures has ever been allowed, and why the Bush cabal was so obstructive to the 9/11 enquiry.

And you call me crazy for believing my own eyes over the contradictory ramblings of leaders that lied to us over Iraq?

FFS Jimbo, you want us to be naive over 9/11 but cynical over Climate Change? Not gonna happen mate, it's irrational. Lies are lies, cover ups are cover ups regardless of the subject, sorry - that's just the way it is.

And back to the thread's original subject: Yes - I think this playing spies crap is just some budget hunting, the timing and pathetic-ness of their 'activities' means some federal agency just decided to dust off the file and get some cheap publicity in order to look busy. Frankly apart from the FBI I'd fire them all and save a bundle.
This is genuinely hilarious! hehe
Yeah, really hilarious. Especially that Youtube vid of your leaders blatently lying to you. confused
Another one; this is a red letter day! hehehehe

Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 13th July 15:05
Oh, sorry, are they not?
If you say so, but of course! hehe
I'll take that as a "No comment" tongue out

BiggusLaddus

821 posts

232 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
Too late to back away slowly now Jim, these cages are rattling themselves. wobblewobble

EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Globulator said:
Jimbeaux said:
Those questions have been beaten to death on other looney theory threads, go find them yourselves. I will not contribute to other PHer's torture. Go sell sell crazy somewhere else Slick, we are all stocked up here.
BTW, the lowest form of "debate" is to change others' quotes to your words.
So no answers, and no - I haven't found your beliefs explained elsewhere BTW, either on a looney "WTC7 fell down because of a hard stare" thread or a looney "Bearded man on a hill masterminds multiple hijacks for hours with zero resistance". Perhaps you know where the missing plane at the pentagon (when everyone was away) went, where the missing plane in a field is that no one saw is, and why two aeroplane proof trade centre buildings were downed, why WTC7 (that no one touched) came down on schedule, and why no analysis of these building failures has ever been allowed, and why the Bush cabal was so obstructive to the 9/11 enquiry.

And you call me crazy for believing my own eyes over the contradictory ramblings of leaders that lied to us over Iraq?

FFS Jimbo, you want us to be naive over 9/11 but cynical over Climate Change? Not gonna happen mate, it's irrational. Lies are lies, cover ups are cover ups regardless of the subject, sorry - that's just the way it is.

And back to the thread's original subject: Yes - I think this playing spies crap is just some budget hunting, the timing and pathetic-ness of their 'activities' means some federal agency just decided to dust off the file and get some cheap publicity in order to look busy. Frankly apart from the FBI I'd fire them all and save a bundle.
This is genuinely hilarious! hehe
Yeah, really hilarious. Especially that Youtube vid of your leaders blatently lying to you. confused
Another one; this is a red letter day! hehehehe

Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 13th July 15:05
Oh, sorry, are they not?
If you say so, but of course! hehe
I'll take that as a "No comment" tongue out
No you can take that as I think you are bordering on being insane and I won't bother responding. wink

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
BiggusLaddus said:
Too late to back away slowly now Jim, these cages are rattling themselves. wobblewobble
Maybe we should just wrap the whole thing in foil and dim the lights. hehe

tybo

2,284 posts

218 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
tybo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Globulator said:
Jimbeaux said:
Those questions have been beaten to death on other looney theory threads, go find them yourselves. I will not contribute to other PHer's torture. Go sell sell crazy somewhere else Slick, we are all stocked up here.
BTW, the lowest form of "debate" is to change others' quotes to your words.
So no answers, and no - I haven't found your beliefs explained elsewhere BTW, either on a looney "WTC7 fell down because of a hard stare" thread or a looney "Bearded man on a hill masterminds multiple hijacks for hours with zero resistance". Perhaps you know where the missing plane at the pentagon (when everyone was away) went, where the missing plane in a field is that no one saw is, and why two aeroplane proof trade centre buildings were downed, why WTC7 (that no one touched) came down on schedule, and why no analysis of these building failures has ever been allowed, and why the Bush cabal was so obstructive to the 9/11 enquiry.

And you call me crazy for believing my own eyes over the contradictory ramblings of leaders that lied to us over Iraq?

FFS Jimbo, you want us to be naive over 9/11 but cynical over Climate Change? Not gonna happen mate, it's irrational. Lies are lies, cover ups are cover ups regardless of the subject, sorry - that's just the way it is.

And back to the thread's original subject: Yes - I think this playing spies crap is just some budget hunting, the timing and pathetic-ness of their 'activities' means some federal agency just decided to dust off the file and get some cheap publicity in order to look busy. Frankly apart from the FBI I'd fire them all and save a bundle.
This is genuinely hilarious! hehe
Yeah, really hilarious. Especially that Youtube vid of your leaders blatently lying to you. confused
Another one; this is a red letter day! hehehehe

Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 13th July 15:05
Oh, sorry, are they not?
If you say so, but of course! hehe
I'll take that as a "No comment" tongue out
No you can take that as I think you are bordering on being insane and I won't bother responding. wink
I'm bordering on being insane for agreeing that there are lies and contadictions in the video poted above?

How does that work then?

I'm referring only to this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hz-6A59qzAU

You did watch it didn't you? whistle


El Guapo

2,787 posts

191 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
It's a shame that this kind of discussion invariably leads to bickering and the sheep vs tin foil hat brigade stand-off.
There has to be a middle ground of rational debate somewhere.
Personally, I tend not to believe everything the government tells me. Should I stock up on Bacofoil?

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
El Guapo said:
It's a shame that this kind of discussion invariably leads to bickering and the sheep vs tin foil hat brigade stand-off.
There has to be a middle ground of rational debate somewhere.
Personally, I tend not to believe everything the government tells me. Should I stock up on Bacofoil?
Absolutely not. Just seperate non-truths from fantasy and science fiction. smile

Fittster

20,120 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...
Who was he caught by? Likely another MI-6 agent. Bad apples in every barrel. Trust me, the Russians have more agents "going off the reservation" than the U.K. yes

Fittster

20,120 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Fittster said:
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...
Who was he caught by? Likely another MI-6 agent. Bad apples in every barrel. Trust me, the Russians have more agents "going off the reservation" than the U.K. yes
I can't help wonder if all this spy v spy stuff actually achieves anything useful but you and I will always disagree on that, so I leave this thread with this quote:

"I learn more from CNN than I do from the CIA" President Bush

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Jimbeaux said:
Fittster said:
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...
Who was he caught by? Likely another MI-6 agent. Bad apples in every barrel. Trust me, the Russians have more agents "going off the reservation" than the U.K. yes
I can't help wonder if all this spy v spy stuff actually achieves anything useful but you and I will always disagree on that, so I leave this thread with this quote:

"I learn more from CNN than I do from the CIA" President Bush
hehe

rypt

2,548 posts

191 months

Thursday 15th July 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Fittster said:
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...
Who was he caught by? Likely another MI-6 agent. Bad apples in every barrel. Trust me, the Russians have more agents "going off the reservation" than the U.K. yes
By the police afaik

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Thursday 15th July 2010
quotequote all
rypt said:
Jimbeaux said:
Fittster said:
Well Russian spies seem a bit better than UK spies. At least the Russians actually try and spy on the other side.

"(Reuters) - A former MI6 agent, charged with trying to sell stolen intelligence files, pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act in court on Wednesday, but denied theft.

Daniel Houghton, 25, appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London accused of stealing material and disclosing the classified files.

The charges said that between September 2007 and May 2009 he stole "a number of electronic files containing techniques for intelligence collection" used by the domestic MI5 agency."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE66D1WR2010071...
Who was he caught by? Likely another MI-6 agent. Bad apples in every barrel. Trust me, the Russians have more agents "going off the reservation" than the U.K. yes
By the police afaik
Well there you go. Ole' Fitt can always be depended upon to be the classic anti-establishment rebel! biggrin

F i F

44,140 posts

252 months

Tuesday 20th July 2010
quotequote all
Globulator said:
Nice tits though
dreamz said:
she apparently wants to come back to the uk

coming to a reality tv show nr you.
Approached to star in film

Puggit

48,476 posts

249 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
F i F said:
Globulator said:
Nice tits though
dreamz said:
she apparently wants to come back to the uk

coming to a reality tv show nr you.
Approached to star in film
Maxim

whistle

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Can anyone apply to become a spy. Or do you still have to be a Cambridge Graduate?.Could Jim fix it for me to interogate Ana Chapman