Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not!

[Andy Zarse]

turbobloke said:

Andy Zarse said:

Benbay001 said:

zarjaz1991 said:

Stickyfinger said:

Should of flown there......ohh wait !

Should HAVE! Arrrrrrrrrrrgh!

Those that do this....do you not think about the fact that what you're typing doesn't make any sense?

I understood him just as well as I understood you.

That's probably because you of a bigger brain and able to forgive the use as an auxiliary verb.

I of no idea what you just said.

Walsall born and Walsall bred,
Strong in the arm an' thick in the yed.

Yes, they even had the word have in 1960's West Midlands.

[Thorodin]

turbobloke said:

I of no idea what you just said.

May I respectfully suggest that yourself and the poster you were answering have both not only repeated a grammatical coqueup but also fatally misunderstood the sense in which the original mistake was made. By repeating twice incorrectly the misuse you have multiplied its use, thereby improving and expanding its chances of becoming even more mainstream. You will note the verbiosity in this post is deliberately flowery in the hope of avoiding the almost inevitable violent retaliation I am now expecting.

[turbobloke]

Thorodin said:

turbobloke said:

I of no idea what you just said.

May I respectfully suggest that yourself and the poster you were answering have both not only repeated a grammatical coqueup but also fatally misunderstood the sense in which the original mistake was made. By repeating twice incorrectly the misuse you have multiplied its use, thereby improving and expanding its chances of becoming even more mainstream. You will note the verbiosity in this post is deliberately flowery in the hope of avoiding the almost inevitable violent retaliation I am now expecting.

Even so and equally respectfully (honest guv) try looking up 'humour' then getting to grips with the leeway it offers in terms of freedom to manipulate speelung, grammer, sin tax and meening, like wot I just wroted.

You will doubtless also note the illustrative nature of part of this post.

[Thorodin]

You win, I give up! No Rules rule! Anarchy!

[Andy Zarse]

Thorodin said:

You win, I give up! No Rules rule! Anarchy!

Not to mention dogmatism!

My view is repeating the misuse of "of" is pure theatrical irony, whereby the implications of a situation, speech, etc, are understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play. Considering you're apparently a stickler for rules and structure, I cannot understand why you do not consider Turbobloke's meiosis meets your high standards. I mean, I get it and I'm from bloody Walsall.

Edited by Andy Zarse on Friday 5th February 15:47

[Thorodin]

Of course I get it! I fear our respective humour quotients are somewhat stratified. The problem arises when a joke has to be explained. I was aware of the original intention.... oh well, never mind!

[Andy Zarse]

Thorodin said:

Of course I get it! I fear our respective humour quotients are somewhat stratified. The problem arises when a joke has to be explained. I was aware of the original intention.... oh well, never mind!

:???: I didn't think there was any humour in your post, so what has to be explained? You simply stated TB had "fatally misunderstood" the usage so, unless there's a very subtle hidden joke in your original reply, I'm not appreciating your appeal to levity.

[anonymous-user]

Moving away from all the spelling stuff did Nige make it in ? If not did they substitute a bust of hitler and say it was about the same thing

[zarjaz1991]

techiedave said:

Moving away from all the spelling stuff did Nige make it in ? If not did they substitute a bust of hitler and say it was about the same thing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

[Northern Munkee]

Interesting aside following on the hard time the lefties handed out last night about the singling out of Muslim woman not able to speak English and unable to integrate

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35504185

[QuantumTokoloshi]

Northern Munkee said:

Interesting aside following on the hard time the lefties handed out last night about the singling out of Muslim woman not able to speak English and unable to integrate

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35504185

But, but, but Ms Mamood said it was all the torys, the torys, the torys. This article is misogynistic, islamophobic, bigoted, transsexualistic, homophobic, government centric(insert suitable "istic" description as applicable) how dare the BBC report events accurately, without suitable progressive lurvy filters applied!

Common purpose would be appalled at this deviation from the multicultural message.

[Northern Munkee]

QuantumTokoloshi said:

Northern Munkee said:

Interesting aside following on the hard time the lefties handed out last night about the singling out of Muslim woman not able to speak English and unable to integrate

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35504185

But, but, but Ms Mamood said it was all the torys, the torys, the torys. This article is misogynistic, islamophobic, bigoted, transsexualistic, homophobic, government centric(insert suitable "istic" description as applicable) how dare the BBC report events accurately, without suitable progressive lurvy filters applied!

Common purpose would be appalled at this deviation from the multicultural message.

'Another said she had been told by Labour members "Islam and feminism aren't compatible".
An advocate for gay rights was told: "This is un-Islamic. Leave that for white people." And many spoke of being criticised for being too Westernised.'

Yeah proving a bit of a problem for the Left, better be careful that "When they came for the [insert -ists] I kept silent... When they came for me, there was no one left to speak for me"

[Stickyfinger]

Again we see how Islamic "Cultural Attitudes" are NOT compatible with western liberal democracies.
It is totally reactionary and attempts at every opportunity to drag us back to the dark ages.

[QuantumTokoloshi]

Northern Munkee said:

QuantumTokoloshi said:

Northern Munkee said:

Interesting aside following on the hard time the lefties handed out last night about the singling out of Muslim woman not able to speak English and unable to integrate

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35504185

But, but, but Ms Mamood said it was all the torys, the torys, the torys. This article is misogynistic, islamophobic, bigoted, transsexualistic, homophobic, government centric(insert suitable "istic" description as applicable) how dare the BBC report events accurately, without suitable progressive lurvy filters applied!

Common purpose would be appalled at this deviation from the multicultural message.

'Another said she had been told by Labour members "Islam and feminism aren't compatible".
An advocate for gay rights was told: "This is un-Islamic. Leave that for white people." And many spoke of being criticised for being too Westernised.'

Yeah proving a bit of a problem for the Left, better be careful that "When they came for the [insert -ists] I kept silent... When they came for me, there was no one left to speak for me"

You know that somewhere in the BBC, a producer has had the idea to use the line, "the so called Westminster regime" in the near past.

[rovermorris999]

Stickyfinger said:

Again we see how Islamic "Cultural Attitudes" are NOT compatible with western liberal democracies.
It is totally reactionary and attempts at every opportunity to drag us back to the dark ages.

The elephant in the room in my opinion.

[Stickyfinger]

rovermorris999 said:

The elephant in the room in my opinion.

Which is (has) taking control at grass roots level in certain areas and is re-enforcing separation/division.

Is this an example of an advanced liberal democracy/party ?

Edited by Stickyfinger on Saturday 6th February 10:38

[Sam All]

Stickyfinger said:

Again we see how Islamic "Cultural Attitudes" are NOT compatible with western liberal democracies.
It is totally reactionary and attempts at every opportunity to drag us back to the dark ages.

A different age certainly.

Amazing that not a day goes by without some controversy about this one group. All brown people then tarred with the same brush. Not healthy, for anyone.

Really needs a radical shake-up - PM is on the case, but really seems a lost cause now- too little, too late.

[irocfan]

Stickyfinger said:

Which is (has) taking control at grass roots level in certain areas and is re-enforcing separation/division.

Is this an example of an advanced liberal democracy/party ?

Edited by Stickyfinger on Saturday 6th February 10:38

yay!! A good old clenched fist salute, nothing wrong with that. Oh no sireee, nothing wrong with that at all. Nothing to see here move along....

[Thorodin]

A striking example of how blind tolerance breeds it's own demise.

[DAVEVO9]

Nigel is on tonight.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b070hsfz