Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not!
Discussion
sidicks said:
King 
said:
said: You agreed with NicD who quoted the Daily Mail article about "benefit cheats". If you don't accept the terminology, why did you agree with him?
The article IS about someone who tried to cheat the system...
King said:
said: And you said you never used the term.
No, I didn't use the term.King said:
said: You said that it was the fault of the system. You can't have it both ways...
No, I said that the system was flawed in that some people can claim benefits that you don't really deserve. My opinions are entirely consitent.Mayb you're just not very clever and struggle to understand English?
King said:
said: I admit it was ambiguous but it was an accident. NicD read it in the way it wasn't intended. I have nothing to apologise for.
You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
You wrote in that exact way, to be intended in that exact way its been taken. You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
You playing dumb only serves to highlight your username is apt.
by name by nature. There is a leftist dogma which holds it anathema to differentiate between those who deserve help and those who don't, holding that all that matters is whether they need help. The tension between this idea, and the reality of human nature is what creates the resentment amongst those who see supporting oneself if possible as a moral choice.
King said:
said: I admit it was ambiguous but it was an accident. NicD read it in the way it wasn't intended. I have nothing to apologise for.
You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
It was completely unambiguous, you just showed your true colours, that's all.You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
You're not really half as clever as you like to pretend, are you?
Mayb, if you read what you wrote below, mayb you'd understand why I said it. You should have been grateful I didn't point out all the other errors in that post. But now you've decided to take that tack, I'd like to point out it was basically sub-literate.
Mayb you're just not very clever and struggle to understand English?
sidicks said:
King said:
said: And you said you never used the term.
No, I didn't use the term.King said:
said: You said that it was the fault of the system. You can't have it both ways...
No, I said that the system was flawed in that some people can claim benefits that you don't really deserve. My opinions are entirely consitent.Mayb you're just not very clever and struggle to understand English?
Edited by King on Saturday 13th December 13:41
on Saturday 13th December 13:41RemyMartin said:
King said:
said: I admit it was ambiguous but it was an accident. NicD read it in the way it wasn't intended. I have nothing to apologise for.
You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
You wrote in that exact way, to be intended in that exact way its been taken. You never apologise for the offensive, reactionary, stuff you submit intentionally.
You playing dumb only serves to highlight your username is apt.
by name by nature. TankRizzo said:
It was completely unambiguous, you just showed your true colours, that's all.
You're not really half as clever as you like to pretend, are you?
Then why do you reckon Ircofan suggested it scanned badly? It's not as if he's my biggest fan, is it? You're not really half as clever as you like to pretend, are you?
If he could see it was ambiguous without being prompted, then you're the one showing 'true colours' by ignoring his contribution.
King said:
said:chris watton said:
King said:
Member for only one month, and well over 50 'contributions' to the UKIP thread! said:Are you an obsessive?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/e...
Yazar said:
Sorry to disappoint but I do it all out of luurve. If you know how I can get paid for it, though, I'm all ears.
MarshPhantom said:
What the hell are you on about?
The fact that the left seems to have decided the South-east should become Mega City One (must have loved Judge Dredd as kids)I fully agree that we need to build more housing for our needs (which have grown massively since 1997). But think it is perhaps time to call time on open borders whilst there is still some green space left.
King said:
said: Sorry to disappoint but I do it all out of luurve.
If you know how I can get paid for it, though, I'm all ears.
I know plenty who'd pay you to shut up... And the only person who loves your stream of drivel is you. I take no side in the debate but you've made yourself look a great big steaming chump in two pages flat.If you know how I can get paid for it, though, I'm all ears.
http://www.theladbible.com/articles/the-best-react...
Jack Collinsonon · Top commenter · Birmingham, United Kingdom
I find it funny that a lot of these comments are saying how "Brand is horrible, Farage is amazing" when Farage is a racist homophobe, who doesn't have a clue what people want. Russell Brand (Although I don't like him as a person) Knows what he is on about and is trying to help people in general. Laughable how people seem to prefer the racist homophobe who really just cares for completely stopping any immigrants from getting into the UK. And if anyone now says that immigrants are a problem and not a benefit, I will…do something xD
You could say that I'm brainwashed with what Brand is saying, but I have had my beliefs for a long time before I knew about what he is now doing now. I have changed what I think many times when seeing what our government is doing, I have come to the conclusion that any leisure we find is just an illusion to try and make us forget about the fact we are born, forced to work our whole lives and then die. We are practically slaves to the rich.
Jack Collinsonon · Top commenter · Birmingham, United Kingdom
I find it funny that a lot of these comments are saying how "Brand is horrible, Farage is amazing" when Farage is a racist homophobe, who doesn't have a clue what people want. Russell Brand (Although I don't like him as a person) Knows what he is on about and is trying to help people in general. Laughable how people seem to prefer the racist homophobe who really just cares for completely stopping any immigrants from getting into the UK. And if anyone now says that immigrants are a problem and not a benefit, I will…do something xD
You could say that I'm brainwashed with what Brand is saying, but I have had my beliefs for a long time before I knew about what he is now doing now. I have changed what I think many times when seeing what our government is doing, I have come to the conclusion that any leisure we find is just an illusion to try and make us forget about the fact we are born, forced to work our whole lives and then die. We are practically slaves to the rich.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff