Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not!
Discussion
Halb said:
Which was offered when...?
Also the current government isn't 'strong', it has a slim majority. The majorities that Labour achieved in '97, '01 and '05 were strong.
..and the majority that Labour achieved in 2005 was with a lower proportion of the popular vote than the Conservatives achieved last week. Boundary rationalisation will sort that out.Also the current government isn't 'strong', it has a slim majority. The majorities that Labour achieved in '97, '01 and '05 were strong.
eharding said:
..and the majority that Labour achieved in 2005 was with a lower proportion of the popular vote than the Conservatives achieved last week. Boundary rationalisation will sort that out.
Indeed. I'm looking through the wiki pages now.Labour had 9.5 back then and 8.6 in 2010 to grow to 9.3 in 2015. The LDs large percentage probably distorted things back then, but Labour increased her share of the vote and yet still lost seats in 2015. Shows how fked FPTP is.
fido said:
Quite impressed with Farage - sure he came over a little bit arrogant as usual but he answered most of the Questions.
Tristram, on the other hand, shows why Labour will not be re-elected. Brian May would make a good speaker (of the House) - no pun intended.
The amount of agreement between Farage and May was surprising. I think the audience started to follow suit after that. Tristram, on the other hand, shows why Labour will not be re-elected. Brian May would make a good speaker (of the House) - no pun intended.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff