Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not!

Balanced Question Time panel tonight - of course not!

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Church cloud 9

She could talk bks all night long but it would be a hell of a good ride wink.

ukwill

8,918 posts

208 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Why is Charlotte Church on QT?


Murph7355

37,761 posts

257 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Paul Dishman said:
Charlotte Church - thick as two short planks
I think you need to apologise to the planks.

Apparently climate change caused the Syrian situation.

Being out in the sun too long definitely caused her some issues. fk nugget.

Paul Dishman

4,714 posts

238 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Church cloud 9

She could talk bks all night long but it would be a hell of a good ride wink.
Too noisy for me

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Church cloud 9

She could talk bks all night long but it would be a hell of a good ride wink.
Someone has to many brown noses listening to her and saying yes all the time.....but was she always so well stacked ?

alock

4,228 posts

212 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Charlotte Church's rant about linking Syria to climate change was something special. Lots of um'ing and ar'ing with no facts. Sounded like she read some silly comment on twitter and tried to expand it into a fully qualified theory on live TV.

And at the end there was complete silence from the audience. You could almost see the tumble weed.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Stickyfinger said:
Welshbeef said:
Church cloud 9

She could talk bks all night long but it would be a hell of a good ride wink.
Someone has to many brown noses listening to her and saying yes all the time.....but was she always so well stacked ?
Voice of an Angel
A couple of good points up front
Dynamite in bed
£16m in the bank
Literally gurl next door bound to be filthy



Did I say she's bound to be utterly filthy;)


ukwill

8,918 posts

208 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Did Charlotte Church really just reference Japan as an example of public rail?

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Is it just me or is Charlotte Church unbearably irritating, 'precocious' comes to mind, and naive

And yes, of course i would!

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
alock said:
Charlotte Church's rant about linking Syria to climate change was something special. Lots of um'ing and ar'ing with no facts. Sounded like she read some silly comment on twitter and tried to expand it into a fully qualified theory on live TV.

And at the end there was complete silence from the audience. You could almost see the tumble weed.
Oh come on she's a little girl (26yo) it's sweet - you should put your sausage in her mouth to stop her talking wink

covmutley

3,028 posts

191 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Living in Cardiff, last time I saw Charlotte church was about 6 months ago in tesco buying 3 bottles of wine, which I think is more her natural habitat than qt.

Definitely would.

Magog

2,652 posts

190 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Nigel Farage on This Week!

Laurel Green

30,783 posts

233 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
I'm guessing, by the talk on here, that the conversation on QT this evening must have been titivating.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
I'm guessing, by the talk on here, that the conversation on QT this evening must have been titivating.
Given its live why was Church sober after the game?

Doesn't she like playing hide the sausage with the Squad......

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
Portillo speaking sense on. Trident and stuff tonight.

s2art

18,937 posts

254 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
Halb said:
Portillo speaking sense on. Trident and stuff tonight.
I am not so sure. He never mentions that if we give up on our nuclear capability then we probably have to give up our seat on the UN security council. Thats a lot of influence lost.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

243 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
Dimbleby - Bombings in Syria, negotiations with the Syrian regime, over to you, Charlotte Church.


Somewhere Chris Morris and Armando Iannucci are weeping, for they are truly redundant.




hidetheelephants

24,492 posts

194 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
s2art said:
Halb said:
Portillo speaking sense on. Trident and stuff tonight.
I am not so sure. He never mentions that if we give up on our nuclear capability then we probably have to give up our seat on the UN security council. Thats a lot of influence lost.
That's one of the fundamental problems with the way the UN and the security council is set up; it's ridiculously slanted to the status quo and those who have buckets of instant sunshine. Reform it and remove the 'nuclear club' nature. An austere deterrent or no deterrent at all would free an enormous amount of defence spend for conventional forces.

AJS-

15,366 posts

237 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
What I don't really understand about Trident (maybe someone can enlighten me?) is this:

We keep hearing that terrorists could develop a dirty bomb in a school science lab, it's a fairly well understood technology which has been around for a while. We have the rockets to deliver them. Do we actually need to maintain a full on nuclear deterrent all the time (which seems to be very expensive) in order to potentially defend against something which may never happen anyway?

It seems like something which made sense during the cold war when a dispute with the USSR could potentially escalate to a nuclear stand off in a few days a la the Cuban missile crisis, but not much sense now, when it's pretty inconceivable that we would be at war with any nuclear power.

At very worst it seems like relations with Russia might deteriorate to the point that armed conflict becomes a possibility, but this would still take a few years.

Is it possible technically to have a more flexible nuclear deterrent which is cheaper to maintain throughout the decades where it's not needed?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd October 2015
quotequote all
ukwill said:
Why is Charlotte Church on QT?
Led some anti something or another campaign recently.


A good reason for catch up TV, shall watch her do car crash TV later.


edit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-32680882

Edited by jmorgan on Friday 2nd October 06:41

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED