Man arrested for swallowing a goldfish.

Man arrested for swallowing a goldfish.

Author
Discussion

Victor McDade

Original Poster:

4,395 posts

182 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Don't the police have anything better to do? What next, raiding restaurants which boil lobsters alive?






A 30-year-old man has been arrested after a video of him swallowing a live goldfish was posted on Facebook.

The footage showed Chris Caswell, a roofer from Newton Aycliffe, buying the goldfish in a pet shop for £1.99.

He told the person serving he lived across the road and convinced them to put the fish in a glass he had brought with him.

Mr Caswell proceeded to horrify the shopworker by swallowing the fish whole, while his friend filming the incident shouted: 'Goldfish down the hatch!'

The police were alerted after the video appeared on Facebook and
Mr Caswell was arrested on Friday on suspicion of animal cruelty.

He was released after being questioned for an hour and later told the Sun he had been drinking at the time of the incident.

'It was over a year ago. We had been out drinking at a friend's party. I can't remember much about it. I have just got a puppy. I like animals,' Mr Caswell claimed.

He must now wait to discover whether he will be charged with animal cruelty.

The video is the latest in a succession of apparent animal cruelty cases to hit the front pages, following the Mary Bale cat in a wheelie bin controversy and the cat dyed pink and thrown over a fence in Swindon

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/842043-facebook-video-...

deevlash

10,442 posts

237 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
a goldfish in a pint of water was the final round of the iron stomach conpetition at my university union one year, the rspca had strop about it back then too and charges were pressed. That was about 10 years ago,

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
The RSPCA had already dropped very low in my estimation with their stance on foxy woxies, but this is completely ridiculous. Are they going to go after anglers, too?

XG332

3,927 posts

188 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Do the rspca know about cod and chips!

pokethepope

2,656 posts

188 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
[Serious Hat]

What would have happened to the fish? Presumably stomach acid would kill it, how long would this take? And how painful would it be when the bloke sts out all the sharp little bones?

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Anyone got the video?

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
XG332 said:
Do the rspca know about cod and chips!
hehe

Citizen09

882 posts

171 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.

eldar

21,747 posts

196 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Citizen09 said:
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.
Do the RSPCA have the power to invertview people?

Jasandjules

69,889 posts

229 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Well I for one am glad.

But then I don't think fishing (as in commercial fishing) should be allowed the way it is, with the fish "suffocating". I would prefer them to be killed quickly and humanely, the same standards we impose upon other animals killed.

ExChrispy Porker

16,914 posts

228 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
eldar said:
Citizen09 said:
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.
Do the RSPCA have the power to invertview people?
Yes but they can't arrest them. Only the police can do that.

shakotan

10,695 posts

196 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Well I for one am glad.

But then I don't think fishing (as in commercial fishing) should be allowed the way it is, with the fish "suffocating". I would prefer them to be killed quickly and humanely, the same standards we impose upon other animals killed.
You'd better have a word with the bears and birds then...

colonel c

7,890 posts

239 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
So the video plaiced Caswell at the scene of the crime then. Will he be pleading gilltee?

FunkyNige

8,883 posts

275 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
AJS- said:
Anyone got the video?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=deb_1285445401

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
colonel c said:
So the video plaiced Caswell at the scene of the crime then. Will he be pleading gilltee?
Eel be lucky not to be sent to prison for that. Cod have been dangerous too.

Thanks Nige, made me laugh.

Man-At-Arms

5,907 posts

179 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
AJS- said:
Eel be lucky not to be sent to prison for that. Cod have been dangerous too.
they'll be a Plaice waiting for him in prison

Victor McDade

Original Poster:

4,395 posts

182 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Citizen09 said:
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.
Thanks - I guess I was being a bit harsh then.

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
ExChrispy Porker said:
eldar said:
Citizen09 said:
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.
Do the RSPCA have the power to invertview people?
Yes but they can't arrest them. Only the police can do that.
I thought the RSPCA was a charity, can't you just tell them to ps off?

turbobloke

103,953 posts

260 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
AJS- said:
colonel c said:
So the video plaiced Caswell at the scene of the crime then. Will he be pleading gilltee?
Eel be lucky not to be sent to prison for that. Cod have been dangerous too.
He probably hoped they'd skate over it but it as mentioned above it was the wrong plaice to try something fishy.

Citizen09

882 posts

171 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
EDLT said:
ExChrispy Porker said:
eldar said:
Citizen09 said:
Victor McDade said:
Don't the police have anything better to do?
In cases like this, the police simply carry out an arrest at the request of another investigatory body; the rest of the investigation - i.e. interview and any gathering of evidence - is the domain of the RSPCA. Whether it's goldfish, being swallowed, cats in bins, or dogs dumped in parks etc.
Do the RSPCA have the power to invertview people?
Yes but they can't arrest them. Only the police can do that.
I thought the RSPCA was a charity, can't you just tell them to ps off?
You can tell a police officer to do that too, in interview. Remember the caution, which starts "You do not have to say anything ... " However, there are potential consquences, as explained in the remainder of the caution.

You can't be forced to give a witness statement.