Consumer Focus faces axe in quango cull

Consumer Focus faces axe in quango cull

Author
Discussion

TuxRacer

13,812 posts

192 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Just another quango that's a waste of time. As said, if its only unique point is a centralised database for TS offices then a few thousand a year should cover that and an umbrella organisation is totally unnecessary.

Good riddance to it.

RichyBoy

3,740 posts

218 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Read the forums a lot and never heard of anyone being referred to this organisation.

When my financial advisor stole all my money, I had to take proceedings against him/his company myself.

Also, anyone that has done the lpc will know that consumer law is the easiest elective on that course.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

179 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Never heard of this quango before. There is a limit to what Govt can do with falling tax receipts, low economic growth and an ageing population. I would rather still have a few hospitals or a Navy worth the name than pay for this lot. A good decision IMO

Mojooo

Original Poster:

12,740 posts

181 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
TuxRacer said:
Just another quango that's a waste of time. As said, if its only unique point is a centralised database for TS offices then a few thousand a year should cover that and an umbrella organisation is totally unnecessary.

Good riddance to it.
Its (consumer direct) main point is its staff that offer basic consumer advice. Once its gone you will have to rely on CAB who will be more stretched and less experienced in this type of thing.

Again, just because some of you lot haven't heard of it doesnt mean its not used.

s3fella

10,524 posts

188 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
TuxRacer said:
Just another quango that's a waste of time. As said, if its only unique point is a centralised database for TS offices then a few thousand a year should cover that and an umbrella organisation is totally unnecessary.

Good riddance to it.
Its (consumer direct) main point is its staff that offer basic consumer advice. Once its gone you will have to rely on CAB who will be more stretched and less experienced in this type of thing.

Again, just because some of you lot haven't heard of it doesnt mean its not used.
But 4 pages in, and no one has ever heard of it nor used it!

So where is the loss to the consumer?

Mojooo

Original Poster:

12,740 posts

181 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
s3fella said:
Mojooo said:
TuxRacer said:
Just another quango that's a waste of time. As said, if its only unique point is a centralised database for TS offices then a few thousand a year should cover that and an umbrella organisation is totally unnecessary.

Good riddance to it.
Its (consumer direct) main point is its staff that offer basic consumer advice. Once its gone you will have to rely on CAB who will be more stretched and less experienced in this type of thing.

Again, just because some of you lot haven't heard of it doesnt mean its not used.
But 4 pages in, and no one has ever heard of it nor used it!

So where is the loss to the consumer?
I have no doubt millions of people have not heard or used the service

That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.

tinman0

18,231 posts

241 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.

dandarez

13,289 posts

284 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.
Some PHs are funny...rolleyes not. What a pathetic, clueless reply.
Mojooo has taken time to respond - intelligently, at least he can string two words together!
He should not have bothered.

As for the silly fool earlier who said he would rather some more hospitals or a proper Navy...
oh bloody dear! The savings that will be had from this supposed cull will be absolutely negligible and hardly pay for a 1950's sailor's pkt o' Navy Cut.

What it will cost to implement will save zilch. In fact, the Gov has now admitted it's more to do with accountability than saving money.
Two thirds of quangos will still survive ffs.

And, no I am not supporting quangos. I agree, many are a waste of money.

But, going by my past experiences over many years, those that are culled will appear again in a different guise under a different name. Then when another government gets in (always happens... been there!) the same thing will be perpetuated again. And again.

But then most of you 'don't give a damn anyway'.
And to be honest, why should you?

This country has turned into a sh*thole.
But I should add 'good luck' to you 'younger' ones in the years ahead.

You won't 'alf bloody need it!!!

normalbloke

7,461 posts

220 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
tinman0 said:
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.
Mojooo has taken time to respond - intelligently, at least he can string two words together!
However his punctuation sucks!

Mojooo

Original Poster:

12,740 posts

181 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.
I don't work for the OFT or CD so my job hasn;t been effected.

I keep telling you consumers WILL be adversley affected but you keep your head in the sand.

Do you run a business?

loafer123

15,448 posts

216 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
Some PHs are funny...rolleyes not. What a pathetic, clueless reply.
Mojooo has taken time to respond - intelligently, at least he can string two words together!
He should not have bothered.
I'm glad he did - as you say, a well informed poster.

said:
As for the silly fool earlier who said he would rather some more hospitals or a proper Navy...
oh bloody dear! The savings that will be had from this supposed cull will be absolutely negligible and hardly pay for a 1950's sailor's pkt o' Navy Cut.
Absolute rubbish.

If you can't afford your mortgage by £100 per month, you don't work out what other £100 bill you can cut, you save £5 here and £10 there until you have £100.

ukwill

8,915 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
tinman0 said:
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.
I don't work for the OFT or CD so my job hasn;t been effected.

I keep telling you consumers WILL be adversley affected but you keep your head in the sand.

Do you run a business?
I'm not quite sure what your angle is. Since this has hit the news, I don't know of anyone that has said "oh christ, and I used them all the time..." (or anything similar). I think thats the general consensus as well.

So what's the problem?

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Since living back at my parents while our house purchase is completed, I have seen first hand where the real problem is. My parent's neighbours have never worked, they have four kids and and another on the way. The husband is on the infamous incapacity benefit, complete with walking stick prop. As soon as he closed the gate in his enclosed garden, the walking stick disappears and he carries brand new baby items (car baby seat, pushchair etc) on his shoulder into his house. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with him, and the state is paying for him, his wife and his four, soon to be five kids. (Mrs was so shocked that she's considering taking pics and sending them to the DHSS!)

Until this is addressed, the UK will continue with its build up of deficit - it is quite blatent and shocking when you see what's going on, and how your tax money is wasted when you see it with your own eyes - a few quangos being culled is but garnish compared to the real squandering of our hard earned.

Sticks.

8,766 posts

252 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Sorry if this has been said already but they recently got npower to refund 1.8m customers a total of £70m. It was in the news.

ukwill

8,915 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all

If I had one bullet I'd line Polly Toynbee up behind George Monbiot.

Just reading the comments under any article written by either of these leaves me truly gobsmacked.

As for the journalistic content, I find their articles strangely merge into the same illogical diatribe. I've long since concluded that if the Conservatives (or current Coalition) were to invent the elixir of life and cure cancer, Toynee/Monbiot would moan that the Conservatives were responsible for increasing the population of our over-inhabited rock.

I find it childish in the extreme. (In exactly the same way that I find many of Littlejohn's rants to be).


ukwill

8,915 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Sticks. said:
Sorry if this has been said already but they recently got npower to refund 1.8m customers a total of £70m. It was in the news.
And I'm pretty sure that Ofgem are still around / not being cut.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
chris watton said:
Since living back at my parents while our house purchase is completed, I have seen first hand where the real problem is. My parent's neighbours have never worked, they have four kids and and another on the way. The husband is on the infamous incapacity benefit, complete with walking stick prop. As soon as he closed the gate in his enclosed garden, the walking stick disappears and he carries brand new baby items (car baby seat, pushchair etc) on his shoulder into his house. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with him, and the state is paying for him, his wife and his four, soon to be five kids. (Mrs was so shocked that she's considering taking pics and sending them to the DHSS!)

Until this is addressed, the UK will continue with its build up of deficit - it is quite blatent and shocking when you see what's going on, and how your tax money is wasted when you see it with your own eyes - a few quangos being culled is but garnish compared to the real squandering of our hard earned.
If she does I hope she gets a better result than we did......it's all talk this 'shop a scrounger' rubbish

Mojooo

Original Poster:

12,740 posts

181 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
ukwill said:
Mojooo said:
tinman0 said:
Mojooo said:
That doest mean there is no loss to the consumer, in many cases it means they will put up with something because they are ill informed.
How's the job hunting going? Bet you can't wait to join the real world again, with a real job.
I don't work for the OFT or CD so my job hasn;t been effected.

I keep telling you consumers WILL be adversley affected but you keep your head in the sand.

Do you run a business?
I'm not quite sure what your angle is. Since this has hit the news, I don't know of anyone that has said "oh christ, and I used them all the time..." (or anything similar). I think thats the general consensus as well.

So what's the problem?
Because I know from experience that CD is used a lot and a valuable tool for many that have used it.

Whilst its there it will be a tool for people to FIND and use if they need it.

What I would say is that if everyone in the country had ehard of them the useage would go through the roof.


Once it becomes part of CAB it wont exist it its current more easily accessible (IMO) state.

--

with regard to consumer focus which the subject of this thread is about - i dont think its such an issue that you havent heard of them, i imagine most of the 1.5m people they got money back for from nPower havent heard of them either.

infact i doubt the vast majority of people had even realised they had been taken for a ride. but its OK, businesses can be trusted...

Edited by Mojooo on Saturday 16th October 13:36