Meanwhile, In Syria

Author
Discussion

Esseesse

8,969 posts

208 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
fblm said:
Ooooh no its a slippery slope they'll be coming after me next! rolleyes
Explain why the targeted killings that have taken place in recent years should not be subject to the legal process. Thanks.
I think I agree with you scherzkeks. A dangerous precedent.

AshBurrows

2,552 posts

162 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
Chimune said:
Learnt something else new today too.

Wiki says "The United Kingdom-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is run out of a two-bedroom terraced home in Coventry by one person, Rami Abdulrahman a Syrian Sunni Muslim who also runs a clothes shop."
Holy moly that's amazing.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
Esseesse said:
I think I agree with you scherzkeks. A dangerous precedent.
What is the 'precedent' you're worried about?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

188 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
AshBurrows said:
Chimune said:
Learnt something else new today too.

Wiki says "The United Kingdom-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is run out of a two-bedroom terraced home in Coventry by one person, Rami Abdulrahman a Syrian Sunni Muslim who also runs a clothes shop."
Holy moly that's amazing.
Must be one hell of a telescope!

Esseesse

8,969 posts

208 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
fblm said:
Esseesse said:
I think I agree with you scherzkeks. A dangerous precedent.
What is the 'precedent' you're worried about?
That the British state is ok with extrajudicial killing when it suits.

jimmybobby

348 posts

106 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
Chimune said:
cirian75 said:
Subtle misinformation has started already:

www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/30/russia-launc...

"US officials told Reuters that Russian airstrikes appeared to have taken place in the vicinity of Homs"

</snip>

"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights earlier said at least 27 people were killed in airstrikes on areas in the western province of Homs. The strikes targeted northern areas in the Homs countryside. Six children were among the dead, while dozens were wounded, the organisation added."

Turns out that although these statements are almost next to eachother, the 27 people were actually killed by the Syrian air force, not the Russians as implied.


Learnt something else new today too.

Wiki says "The United Kingdom-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is run out of a two-bedroom terraced home in Coventry by one person, Rami Abdulrahman a Syrian Sunni Muslim who also runs a clothes shop."
I am loving the present situation. putin is doing it all exactly right and pissing the US off no end. He is making complete idiots of them. They are now very very angry with that nasty Russian man as instead of bombing who he is told to by the Americans he is bombing Americans "friendly rebel" allies who are also Isis friendly rebels...

Poor America. So stupid.

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
jimmybobby said:
Chimune said:
cirian75 said:
Subtle misinformation has started already:

www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/30/russia-launc...

"US officials told Reuters that Russian airstrikes appeared to have taken place in the vicinity of Homs"

</snip>

"The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights earlier said at least 27 people were killed in airstrikes on areas in the western province of Homs. The strikes targeted northern areas in the Homs countryside. Six children were among the dead, while dozens were wounded, the organisation added."

Turns out that although these statements are almost next to eachother, the 27 people were actually killed by the Syrian air force, not the Russians as implied.


Learnt something else new today too.

Wiki says "The United Kingdom-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is run out of a two-bedroom terraced home in Coventry by one person, Rami Abdulrahman a Syrian Sunni Muslim who also runs a clothes shop."
I am loving the present situation. putin is doing it all exactly right and pissing the US off no end. He is making complete idiots of them. They are now very very angry with that nasty Russian man as instead of bombing who he is told to by the Americans he is bombing Americans "friendly rebel" allies who are also Isis friendly rebels...

Poor America. So stupid.
Your post is stupid

Wills2

22,832 posts

175 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 30th September 2015
quotequote all
Esseesse said:
fblm said:
Esseesse said:
I think I agree with you scherzkeks. A dangerous precedent.
What is the 'precedent' you're worried about?
That the British state is ok with extrajudicial killing when it suits.
If a precedent has been set was it not set decades ago when the enemy was PIRA? Shoot to kill, Operation Flavius etc... How many times can you set the same precedent? This slippery slope of extrajudicial killings seemingly imagined by some appears neither very slippery nor very steep.

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
fblm said:
scherzkeks said:
Explain why the targeted killings that have taken place in recent years should not be subject to the legal process. Thanks.
Explain how I am supposed to answer such a stupidly vague question. Then explain why I should care that they were targeted rather than simply killed as enemy combatants. Here's a simple rule of thumb; don't join ISIS in a war zone, don't get killed by a government ordered drone strike. It's worked for me so far.
A non-answer and a bunch of abuse. What a surprise.

Transmitter Man

4,253 posts

224 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Putin said that there were not "Russian solders and military tools in Ukraine but satellites showed columns of tanks on trailers
Putin is fighting ISIS in Syria but putting bombs on the heads of moderate fighters, whom he now calls ISIS.

Do you think Obama realizes he's been kicked in the ass?

Phil

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Transmitter Man said:
Putin said that there were not "Russian solders and military tools in Ukraine but satellites showed columns of tanks on trailers
Putin is fighting ISIS in Syria but putting bombs on the heads of moderate fighters, whom he now calls ISIS.

Do you think Obama realizes he's been kicked in the ass?

Phil
Yup


QuantumTokoloshi

4,164 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Transmitter Man said:
Putin said that there were not "Russian solders and military tools in Ukraine but satellites showed columns of tanks on trailers
Putin is fighting ISIS in Syria but putting bombs on the heads of moderate fighters, whom he now calls ISIS.

Do you think Obama realizes he's been kicked in the ass?

Phil
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whom are being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.

Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:18

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

183 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.

PRTVR

7,107 posts

221 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.
I have to agree, it would appear that we have not learnt anything from the past in overthrowing dictatorships in this area.

MikeT66

2,680 posts

124 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
PRTVR said:
V88Dicky said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.
I have to agree, it would appear that we have not learnt anything from the past in overthrowing dictatorships in this area.
Same here - it seems the West hasn't learned anything from the disasters of Iraq and Libya when it comes to removing middle-eastern dictators.

QuantumTokoloshi

4,164 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
It is amazing how the media is now asking the questions about "will this action make it worse?", the scrutiny of the civilian casualties in the bombing campaign. When it is a not approved government, sorry regime, they are civilian casualties, otherwise they are called collateral damage. Suddenly, military intervention is not a good and noble action protecting people from violent extremists. It is a power hungry demagogue, expanding his influence.

I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Why were these questions not asked when the UK, France and the USA "bombed for democracy and freedom" in Libya, and protected civilians by dropping bombs on them or gave the gift of explosive democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan. The questions about continued supply of weapons and training to terrorist groups within Syria prolonging the conflict and ultimately making ISIS stronger? The non-questioning about the absurd 45 minute claim in Iraq? The non questioning of the Al Qaeda link to Saddam Hussein or the entire non WMD lie.

Where are the questions about Saudi, USA and UAE role in Yemen, Saudi and Qatari involvement in Syria?

The UK and Western media has gone into overdrive to shape this narrative quickly, as this intervention has caught them cold. They really do need to ensure the appropriate message is beamed out again.

The war with Eurasia cannot falter, remember war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, fellow citizens and subjects.

Propaganda war hots up.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-30/propagand...

Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 10:55

Wills2

22,832 posts

175 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
MikeT66 said:
PRTVR said:
V88Dicky said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.
I have to agree, it would appear that we have not learnt anything from the past in overthrowing dictatorships in this area.
Same here - it seems the West hasn't learned anything from the disasters of Iraq and Libya when it comes to removing middle-eastern dictators.
Indeed, I'm getting a bit sick of our double standards.

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
MikeT66 said:
PRTVR said:
V88Dicky said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.
I have to agree, it would appear that we have not learnt anything from the past in overthrowing dictatorships in this area.
Same here - it seems the West hasn't learned anything from the disasters of Iraq and Libya when it comes to removing middle-eastern dictators.
Indeed, I'm getting a bit sick of our double standards.
Assad was being cuddled up to by the west just before the Arab Spring, just like Gaddafi was. Suddenly it all turned table and both became 'vile dictators' when in reality they held a disparate group of tribes together by exerting questionable methods, methods we chose to ignore when it suited us and were amplified when we thought the tide was turning.

Fact of the matter is that Syria presents a far greater risk to national and regional security currently than Iraq or Afghanistan ever did before our dubious and ill-founded interventions without end-game. We've painted ourselves into a corner and no longer know who to fight or why so are impotent to intervene in any realistic way, especially with the 'Arab guilt' after 15 years of fecking about in their affairs.
Putin has no such truck with whether he offends the sensibilities of the procrastinators and hand-wringers and can intervene robustly with a view to rebooting Assad, to his own huge advantage both strategically in the region and tactically in the domestic sphere.

Obama, Camerone et al have had the march stolen from them and can only bleat from the sidelines in ironic argument about killing the wrong sort of terrorist. They have the temerity to point a finger and conveniently forget their instrumentality in creating the whole situation in the first place. I'm aghast at their lack of humility, but not surprised.

Like I say, all the ammo has gone, fired long ago at the wrong targets. We just have to sit and watch; the least we can do is stop bleating about it.

coetzeeh

2,648 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st October 2015
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
MikeT66 said:
PRTVR said:
V88Dicky said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
These mythical "moderate" Islamic fundamentalist fighters, like al-Qaeda or Al Nusra? Do you actually mean terrorists, some of whoever being armed and trained by the USA, but the weapons are being handed over to ISIS.

Did the USA not tacitly support another terrorist group in the recent past? The one which blew up Canary wharf, Manchester and Brighton? I guess they were also moderates.




Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 1st October 07:03
Good on Russia, I say.

I hope Assad stays in power and takes his country back. A secular and stable Syria is in the best interest for most people in the region, imho.
I have to agree, it would appear that we have not learnt anything from the past in overthrowing dictatorships in this area.
Same here - it seems the West hasn't learned anything from the disasters of Iraq and Libya when it comes to removing middle-eastern dictators.
Indeed, I'm getting a bit sick of our double standards.
Agreed - you go Vlad!