Meanwhile, In Syria
Discussion
Russia's explanation seems rather far fetched.
U.S. dismisses Russian assertion rebels to blame for Syria gas attack
U.S. dismisses Russian assertion rebels to blame for Syria gas attack
Reuters said:
U.S. intelligence officials, based on a preliminary assessment, said the deaths were most likely caused by sarin nerve gas dropped by Syrian aircraft on the town of Khan Sheikhoun on Tuesday. A senior state department official said Washington had not yet ascertained it was sarin.
Moscow offered an alternative explanation that would shield Assad: that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons depot hit by Syrian bombs.
Moscow offered an alternative explanation that would shield Assad: that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons depot hit by Syrian bombs.
BlackLabel said:
Russia's explanation seems rather far fetched.
U.S. dismisses Russian assertion rebels to blame for Syria gas attack
Actually as far as I am concerned the Russian version is by far the most credible yet. The terrorists are known to have chem weapons. They are known to have used them as false flags and they are known to be trying to manufacture them as well.U.S. dismisses Russian assertion rebels to blame for Syria gas attack
Reuters said:
U.S. intelligence officials, based on a preliminary assessment, said the deaths were most likely caused by sarin nerve gas dropped by Syrian aircraft on the town of Khan Sheikhoun on Tuesday. A senior state department official said Washington had not yet ascertained it was sarin.
Moscow offered an alternative explanation that would shield Assad: that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons depot hit by Syrian bombs.
Moscow offered an alternative explanation that would shield Assad: that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons depot hit by Syrian bombs.
It seems once again they have achieved their aims and the stupid braindead west are lapping it up and blaming Assad who had absolutely 1 billion percent no reason to carry out a chemical attack.
He has repeatedly shown himself to be considerate of human life contrary to what the Western media and Governments will have us believe.
He set up pathways to get people out of Allepo numerous times however the so called friendly rebels would shoot at anyone who tried to leave. In the end he achieved his goal and got them all out. Oddly as he pointed out he would target rebels positions and bomb and shoot them. The rebels however would simply indiscriminately lob grenades etc into the Government held part of Aleppo killing and injuring civilians not military personnel.
Of course the MSM and Western Government chose to ignore this little factoid. Rebels bombing civilians doesnt make for a good storyline when you are trying to present the so called friendly rebels aka terrorists as the good guys.
Unfortunately now Trump is taking the same stupid decision as everyone else and believing the moronic media and his stupid advisers and is talking of taking action which no doubt will lead to a conflict between the US and Russia who have stated they side with Assad. One of the main reasons I wanted Trump to win was unlike Hillary he seemed to want to stay well clear of interfering in Syria and the ME.
f
ksakesI see the usual people making excuses for Assad and Russia.
Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
Zod said:
I see the usual people making excuses for Assad and Russia.
Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
Who else could have done it? Are you serious? The rebels aka terrorists are known to have carried out chemical attacks. They are known to have overrun military bases where chemicals could have been stored.Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
No worries keep believing the bulls
t from the media fed to them by the terrorists and a chap in his bedroom in London.As ever ignore the blatantly obvious question.
Why would Assad use chemical weapons on civilians which he knows is a huge no no when he is winning and is gaining support from the western media and governments?
La Liga said:
People on PH know better than our intelligence services.
It has nothing to do with our intelligence services they know jack diddly squat about what actually happened. Even if they did I can guarantee the Gov will spin it as being done by Assad as it suits their narrative. I know how our government works. I have seen the lies they tell. The official secrets act is a wonderful way for them to hide the truth.
frankenstein12 said:
It has nothing to do with our intelligence services they know jack diddly squat about what actually happened.
You are, in the most obvious way possible, in no position to say what they do and do not know. frankenstein12 said:
Even if they did I can guarantee the Gov will spin it as being done by Assad as it suits their narrative.
You can't guarantee anything of the sort. frankenstein12 said:
I know how our government works.
And evidently the intelligence services. Quite the repertoire. Raygun said:
Looking at these last couple of pages of this thread looks more like one of them cranky 9/11 conspiracy websites than a car forum.
Assad is a murdering toerag who's not to be trusted. Some on here would give him the Nobel Peace Prize.
Funny you should mention the Nobel peace prize, would that include Barack "I love drone attacks" Obama or the ever popular White "we luv Jihadi propaganda" Helmets? Or would a lying murdering toerag also extend to Blair in Afghanistan and Iraq or perhaps Cameron in Libya ?Assad is a murdering toerag who's not to be trusted. Some on here would give him the Nobel Peace Prize.
There is a common theme to these attacks, the speed at which it is attributed to the Assad government and the remarkably complete narrative available at short notice.
The south Ghouta attack was attributed to Assad along with a complete narrative and remarkably accurate casualty list, within hours! Could not possibly been pre-prepared, oh no. It was just excellent reporting, without reporters even being in the country or even in the wonderfully liberal moderately fundamentalist areas, where Kuffar reporters tend to end up dead.
This time again, quickly attributed to Assad, without any substantive evidence beyond readily available emotive pictures and the "Allah U Akbar" taqiyaa eyewitness accounts. A speciality of the white helmets.
Both these events fortuitously timed to do maximum propaganda damage to Assad and Putin. How coincidently convenient.
Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 6th April 07:59
QuantumTokoloshi said:
Raygun said:
Looking at these last couple of pages of this thread looks more like one of them cranky 9/11 conspiracy websites than a car forum.
Assad is a murdering toerag who's not to be trusted. Some on here would give him the Nobel Peace Prize.
Funny you should mention Nobel peace prize, would that include Barack "I love drone attacks" Obama or the ever popular White "we luv Jihadi propaganda" Helmets? Assad is a murdering toerag who's not to be trusted. Some on here would give him the Nobel Peace Prize.
There is a common theme to these attacks, the speed at which it is attributed to the Assad government and the remarkably complete narrative available at short notice.
The south ghouta attack was attributed to Assad along with a remarkably accurate casualty list, within hours! Could not possibly been prepared, oh no. It was just excellent reporting, without reporters even being in the country.
This time again, quickly attributed to Assad, without any substantive evidence beyond readily available emotive pictures and the " Allah U Akbar" taqiyaa eyewitness accounts. A speciality of the white helmets.
Both these events fortuitously timed to do maximum propaganda damage to Assad. How coincidently convenient.
La Liga said:
People on PH know better than our intelligence services.
Iraqi WMD anyone? Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case. Libya, and the bright shining future after Gaddafi. Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case too. Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 6th April 08:05
frankenstein12 said:
Zod said:
I see the usual people making excuses for Assad and Russia.
Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
Who else could have done it? Are you serious? The rebels aka terrorists are known to have carried out chemical attacks. They are known to have overrun military bases where chemicals could have been stored.Occam's razor is to be applied here; Assad did it.
It is absurd to ask where is the proof. Who else could have done it? The claim that bombs blew up and spread rebel gas stores has been debunked. Assad and Russia have no credible story.
No worries keep believing the bulls
t from the media fed to them by the terrorists and a chap in his bedroom in London.As ever ignore the blatantly obvious question.
Why would Assad use chemical weapons on civilians which he knows is a huge no no when he is winning and is gaining support from the western media and governments?
Where ischief knave scherzkeks by the way? I expect he's buzzing away in a corner wondering how to deal with the Trump admistration's (but not Trump's) accusation of Assad and complaint against Russia.
QuantumTokoloshi said:
La Liga said:
People on PH know better than our intelligence services.
Iraqi WMD anyone? Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case. Libya, and the bright shining future after Gaddafi. Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case too. Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 6th April 08:05
Zod said:
QuantumTokoloshi said:
La Liga said:
People on PH know better than our intelligence services.
Iraqi WMD anyone? Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case. Libya, and the bright shining future after Gaddafi. Guess the "intelligence services" knew better in that case too. Edited by QuantumTokoloshi on Thursday 6th April 08:05
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff