Japan Fukushima nuclear thread

Author
Discussion

hidetheelephants

24,352 posts

193 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Whereas the cost of making a vast dome tomb over it sealing for ever is easily known. Why not go the easy route?
Vast domes cannot be guaranteed for more than a few hundred years; the NSC is warranted for 100 years and it cost £2bn. Even if a 'forever' dome could be engineered it would be prohibitively expensive and nothing about it would be easy.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Welshbeef said:
Whereas the cost of making a vast dome tomb over it sealing for ever is easily known. Why not go the easy route?
Vast domes cannot be guaranteed for more than a few hundred years; the NSC is warranted for 100 years and it cost £2bn. Even if a 'forever' dome could be engineered it would be prohibitively expensive and nothing about it would be easy.
£2billion for 100 years v the £150billion spent to date...hmm they could have had 7,500 years of warranted back to back new domes.

hidetheelephants

24,352 posts

193 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
The problem is that much of that notional 150bn is costs racked up because of asinine politicians making decisions for emotional reasons rather than actual radiological hazard; take out the radiophobia and the cost is much less.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
The problem is that much of that notional 150bn is costs racked up because of asinine politicians making decisions for emotional reasons rather than actual radiological hazard; take out the radiophobia and the cost is much less.
More than £2b?

hidetheelephants

24,352 posts

193 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
Why the obsession with domes? The need for an environmental shield at Fukushima is nugatory, they'll probably just replace the damaged roof structures with much the same as before.

mcdjl

5,446 posts

195 months

Monday 6th February 2017
quotequote all
Unless the dome is going to stop the radioactive ground water leaking into the sea they'll have to do something beyond building a dome anyway.

Gary C

12,431 posts

179 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
mcdjl said:
Unless the dome is going to stop the radioactive ground water leaking into the sea they'll have to do something beyond building a dome anyway.
Probably inject the ground with a solidification agent similar to the bomb machining building in Aldermaston.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
Gary C said:
Probably inject the ground with a solidification agent similar to the bomb machining building in Aldermaston.
tell more........

hidetheelephants

24,352 posts

193 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
mcdjl said:
Unless the dome is going to stop the radioactive ground water leaking into the sea they'll have to do something beyond building a dome anyway.
They're already doing plenty to mitigate ground water ingress and prevent its escape; that's what the freeze wall was for and before that was attempted they were pumping huge quantities of water out of the local water table to reduce the amount flowing into the basement levels of the power station.

Edited by hidetheelephants on Sunday 12th February 19:44

MOTORVATOR

6,993 posts

247 months

Sunday 12th February 2017
quotequote all
Given the number of volcanoes round that way I can't see them being short of a little sodium benonite if they put their minds to it. wink

gowmonster

2,471 posts

167 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
forgot to post this ages ago, was reminded of it today, maybe it was posted before...

anyway

https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/fukushima-no-go-zone...

jjlynn27

7,935 posts

109 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
gowmonster said:
forgot to post this ages ago, was reminded of it today, maybe it was posted before...

anyway

https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/fukushima-no-go-zone...
Thanks for posting that. Sobering read.

hidetheelephants

24,352 posts

193 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
gowmonster said:
forgot to post this ages ago, was reminded of it today, maybe it was posted before...

anyway

https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/fukushima-no-go-zone...
2.3 microsieverts/hr! Stop the presses! He's been exposed to the pro-rata equivalent of what the annual occupational maximum was the last time I had sight of such information! ZOMG! He'll be killed to death! wobble

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
gowmonster said:
forgot to post this ages ago, was reminded of it today, maybe it was posted before...

anyway

https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/fukushima-no-go-zone...
2.3 microsieverts/hr! Stop the presses! He's been exposed to the pro-rata equivalent of what the annual occupational maximum was the last time I had sight of such information! ZOMG! He'll be killed to death! wobble
Be fair, if he was there two days it would amount to about as much as a chest x-ray.

Gary C

12,431 posts

179 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
hidetheelephants said:
gowmonster said:
forgot to post this ages ago, was reminded of it today, maybe it was posted before...

anyway

https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/fukushima-no-go-zone...
2.3 microsieverts/hr! Stop the presses! He's been exposed to the pro-rata equivalent of what the annual occupational maximum was the last time I had sight of such information! ZOMG! He'll be killed to death! wobble
Be fair, if he was there two days it would amount to about as much as a chest x-ray.
But still more than I get in a working week at a uk AGR,

but a LOT less than I got in 1/2 a day at an RBMK in Russia (managed to double my lifetime dose !)

hairykrishna

13,166 posts

203 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Great photos though.

Don1

15,948 posts

208 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
A slightly ghoulish question.... With the 530 sieverts reading, how would you die? Spontaneously combust? Sudden toxic shock and everything would stop? Turn into the Gestapo officer in Raiders of the Lost Ark?

Asking for a friend, obviously.

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Don1 said:
A slightly ghoulish question.... With the 530 sieverts reading, how would you die? Spontaneously combust? Sudden toxic shock and everything would stop? Turn into the Gestapo officer in Raiders of the Lost Ark?

Asking for a friend, obviously.
Let me Google that for you - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_radiation_synd...

Don1

15,948 posts

208 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Doesn't really answer - I'm guessing the answer is nobody really knows?

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Don1 said:
Doesn't really answer - I'm guessing the answer is nobody really knows?
Err - you DID read the article, didn't you ? The effects of radiation of the human body are well known as victims of the Hiroshima & Nagasaki events were closely monitored.