Selling house after divorce

Selling house after divorce

Author
Discussion

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

252 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
As above - there is no "Rule" .... so what if he put in the deposit???? Maybe she bought all the cleaning products that kept it from getting dirty!

Its a marital asset - they either figure out a split themsleves (which can be based on anything they like....he gets 82% because its a fav number...doesnt matter, as long as they agree).....or a court will sort it and prob chop the equity down the middle with no kids.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
Is this going through solicitors or are the OP' friends trying to sort this out on their own?

If the latter, then they can decide whatever they feel is fair surely?

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

157 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Is this going through solicitors or are the OP' friends trying to sort this out on their own?

If the latter, then they can decide whatever they feel is fair surely?
And then 5 years down the line this happens .....

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

The ONLY to get a binding financial split is via a Court Order.

JonRB

74,558 posts

272 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
Tiggsy said:
As above - there is no "Rule" .... so what if he put in the deposit???? Maybe she bought all the cleaning products that kept it from getting dirty!

Its a marital asset - they either figure out a split themsleves (which can be based on anything they like....he gets 82% because its a fav number...doesnt matter, as long as they agree).....or a court will sort it and prob chop the equity down the middle with no kids.
Indeed.

Unless you have a Declaration of Trust or a Consent Order then all bets are off.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
But up to that point surely they can decide the split.

I'm talking about solicitors being involved throughout - it's not needed if both parties can act like adults and keep things amicable.

JonRB

74,558 posts

272 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
garyhun said:
But up to that point surely they can decide the split.

I'm talking about solicitors being involved throughout - it's not needed if both parties can act like adults and keep things amicable.
This is true. But doesn't often happen, sadly.

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
garyhun said:
Is this going through solicitors or are the OP' friends trying to sort this out on their own?

If the latter, then they can decide whatever they feel is fair surely?
And then 5 years down the line this happens .....

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

The ONLY to get a binding financial split is via a Court Order.
That thread is just vile. It only covers (I think) her intentions to have another grab at his wallet. It doesnt say she succeeded.

JonRB

74,558 posts

272 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
Burwood said:
That thread is just vile. It only covers (I think) her intentions to have another grab at his wallet. It doesnt say she succeeded.
Just goes to show how important a Clean Break divorce is; something my Matrimonial Solicitor tried hard to emphasise to me when I felt that I had come out of my divorce financially badly - she told me not to underestimate what a Clean Break was worth.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Just goes to show how important a Clean Break divorce is; something my Matrimonial Solicitor tried hard to emphasise to me when I felt that I had come out of my divorce financially badly - she told me not to underestimate what a Clean Break was worth.
Ain't that the truth!

Nickyboy

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

234 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for all the info

No solicitors or anything yet, they've split amicably, just grew apart.

She was worried he'd have half plus his deposit. I think she's off to get proper advice next week.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 25th September 2015
quotequote all
Nickyboy said:
She was worried he'd have half plus his deposit. I think she's off to get proper advice next week.
Surely if it's amicable then half plus deposit IS fair?

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

252 months

Saturday 26th September 2015
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Nickyboy said:
She was worried he'd have half plus his deposit. I think she's off to get proper advice next week.
Surely if it's amicable then half plus deposit IS fair?
Is it?

He put £25k into THEM as a couple. Should he get back all the gifts he gave her too?

When you get married you do stuff for you as a couple.....you simply cant unwind it all later. If so, how do you allow for stuff like who did the DIY? Does that person get to submit an invoice for their work when you split?

You get married.....you merge your lives. You split, you split in half.

Its like too people making a cake....when its cooked, you get half each. If you no longer like each other you can no longer worry about the fact one of you contributed all the flour and the other only gave one egg and some chocky sprinkles!

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 26th September 2015
quotequote all
But if only one party could afford the oven then it's fair that they keep that!

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Saturday 26th September 2015
quotequote all
Old Merc said:
This happened to me a long time ago but may be still relevant to this case.
My girl friend and I bought a house,I put down 60% of the deposit,she 40%,we then shared the mortgage and bills.
We also took out a legal agreement,some like "declaration of trust" or what ever??
When we split I got 60% of the equity and she got 40%.
This.

Many would expect that any equity is split pro rata to the original deposit.

If i stump up 80% of deposit then I expect 80% of the equity derived from that risk.

JonRB

74,558 posts

272 months

Saturday 26th September 2015
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
This.

Many would expect that any equity is split pro rata to the original deposit.

If i stump up 80% of deposit then I expect 80% of the equity derived from that risk.
And that is why lawyers get involved. smile

amusingduck

9,396 posts

136 months

Tuesday 29th September 2015
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
This.

Many would expect that any equity is split pro rata to the original deposit.

If i stump up 80% of deposit then I expect 80% of the equity derived from that risk.
So if you got married, put down 100% of the deposit for the house, then got divorced and sold, you'd expect everything? hehe

Good luck with that one.

throt

3,055 posts

170 months

Tuesday 29th September 2015
quotequote all
JonRB said:
And that is why lawyers get involved. smile
They love divorce disagreements, makes them rub there hands together.

Adults should learn to be adults and sort problems without having to pay £50 plus per letter. Some women will fight over the last pillow, even if it cost 3k via a solicitor.

JonRB

74,558 posts

272 months

Tuesday 29th September 2015
quotequote all
throt said:
Adults should learn to be adults and sort problems without having to pay £50 plus per letter. Some women will fight over the last pillow, even if it cost 3k via a solicitor.
Perhaps. But lawyers exist because people often can't come to an agreement, especially if both sides consider their requests to be reasonable and the other's to be unreasonable.

Anyway, it's a moot point.


Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Tuesday 29th September 2015
quotequote all
throt said:
JonRB said:
And that is why lawyers get involved. smile
They love divorce disagreements, makes them rub there hands together.

Adults should learn to be adults and sort problems without having to pay £50 plus per letter. Some women will fight over the last pillow, even if it cost 3k via a solicitor.
£50/letter hehe the last time i used a lawyer it worked out £1,000 per letter-just an ordinary dispute which, looking back i started based on principle and i merely wanted the other side to have to spend money

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Tuesday 29th September 2015
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
DoubleSix said:
This.

Many would expect that any equity is split pro rata to the original deposit.

If i stump up 80% of deposit then I expect 80% of the equity derived from that risk.
So if you got married, put down 100% of the deposit for the house, then got divorced and sold, you'd expect everything? hehe

Good luck with that one.
It's not an example of how me and my wife treat our assets personally.

But to answer your question, yes some would.