Discussion
Ginge R said:
Edit: If it's any consolation, I don't bother much with solicitors either. Especially ones who can't read a brief.
Given the number of times you have to correct yourself on posts in this section, you should probably have one on speed dial!jEdited by Ginge R on Sunday 25th September 22:45
85Carrera said:
I will, thank you.
Partly because I don't have an active proposal to have a company struck off to worry about
Are you suggesting I do? Financial services, these days, is a field which requires the very highest standards (as you should know). I'm content that my contributions here are 'safe', compliant, intended to be helpful, and in accordance with FCA guidance. On the rare (contrary to your suggestion) occasion I misread something, or misinterpret something, I'll revise. I have no concerns now nor (hopefully!) in the future about my conduct. Partly because I don't have an active proposal to have a company struck off to worry about
85Carrera said:
It is, yes. Apologies, when you referred to being struck off earlier, I thought that you referred to FCA action. The accounts are overdue, for legitimate and genuine reasons, which, if I decided you needed to know about, I'd tell you. Suffice to say, I'm more than content with the current (and future) circumstances, and so is my accountant. Please feel free to try and imply otherwise. However, I've been on Pistonheads long enough to know this is the equivalent of mud slinging, willy waving, business bashing, so crack on.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff