Replacing stair banisters - how hard?

Replacing stair banisters - how hard?

Author
Discussion

Redmax

Original Poster:

752 posts

214 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
Following on from my door-hanging thread earlier in the week, the stairs won't look right once I've replaced all the doors.

I had a nice chap from Neville Johnson (www.nevillejohnsonstaircases.co.uk) come in yesterday to have a look around and to give us a quote. I know they're generally an expensive firm but was pretty shocked at the outline/informal quote of around £25k for a pretty simple oak staircase, well two really. This is essentially to replace the bits you can see, so the newel posts, spindles, etc.

Since then I've been looking at the Richard Burridge website, and without costing it all out it looks like I could get the bits I need for much less money.

So the question is, how hard are those staircase elements to replace for a competent DIY-er?

Cheers

Blakeatron

2,516 posts

174 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
Really depends on how your stairs are made.

If you are removing nule posts then you are into a much bigger job, One I would not consider doing and just replace stairs.

Most stairs have solid Nules, with a grooved bottom 'track' and another groove under the handrail. If this is the case with you then all you have to do is knock out the spindles, prise out the timber infils and replace.

Cheaper stairs will have the handrails screwed on, properly made stairs will have the handrials morticed and tenoned into the nules and so are far harder to replace.

Simpo Two

85,595 posts

266 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
Blakeatron said:
nule posts
headache newel posts


I painted mine from stained wood to white so could retain them, but if fitting new, get the lengths exctly right or the handrail won't sit properly.

Redmax

Original Poster:

752 posts

214 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
I definitely would need to replace the newel posts - I want the whole thing to be in oak. It does look very complicated, but I've just done a rough costing for the Richard Burbidge stuff and it looks like it's coming out at £3.5k absolute tops for the materials. That's a huge saving over getting the professionals in, so worthy of further exploration I think.

A couple of pics of the main staircase to show what I'm up against:





I won't worry about it for now though, I need to get these doors hung first...

Cheers

mgtony

4,022 posts

191 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
I would say that your spindles are in upside down, might just be me though. smile

Some of those newel posts will be part of the staircases structure. To replace the whole lot is a bit more than a DIY job, get a few more quotes from some local joinery firms.

andyred

13 posts

247 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
i did mine in Richard Burridge fusion range you just cut the newels and them bolt the new ones on took me two days and it was easy the only issue was marking out the spacing for the Balusters if you need more advice P.M me good luck.

Simpo Two

85,595 posts

266 months

Friday 29th July 2011
quotequote all
That's not pretty is it.

Could you tidy it up by having the stairs exiting to the right, saving the need for another 90 degree turn and the chunk of railings on the right?

Flintstone

8,644 posts

248 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
I'm replacing mine at the moment although mine is a lot more simple. I considered replacing the newels but as some of them are an integral part of the staircase I would need to cut those off and place the new ones on top. Seemed to me that there were at least two problems with this. Firstly, if the cut wasn't exactly square the new one would never sit straight and secondly butt joining them, even with dowels and plenty of screws, was never going to be really that strong.

I kept the originals even though that's necessitated a bit of buggering about with filling and sanding.

CunningPlan

228 posts

161 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
I'm possibly repeating what Simpo said - but I don't get the square landing at the bottom, why not just another two steps? I'd agree that everyone has different tastes, but the current outfit does remind me of a trailer I saw for Gypsy Brides.

Oh - my interest in this thread is because my staircase is an expanse of white gloss painted plywood. People who live in glass houses...

Simpo Two

85,595 posts

266 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
CunningPlan said:
my staircase is an expanse of white gloss painted plywood. People who live in glass houses...
All the rage in the 1930s; bannisters were old fashioned and many were boxed in.

Redmax

Original Poster:

752 posts

214 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
You think the bottom step arrangement is bad? This bit makes me nauseous every time I see it - reminds me of a wild west-themed pub with a wagon wheel on the wall.



I think the reason for the layout at the bottom is that if the bottom couple of stepss didn't come back on themselves (so they're in the same plane as the main flight), they'd be pretty much in front of the living room doors.





I don't think there's quite enough space for the stairs to go straight down, bearing in mind the photo above probably makes it look a bit bigger than it is. There's about 2.3m from that box section at the base and the kitchen door from where I took the photo immediately above. I'll measure up accurately at some point to work out where they'd finish if they did come straight down.

I think the bit I find most offensive (apart from the colour and style) is that boxed-in section. It makes it look so 'heavy', and I suspect would look better opened up.

Cheers

Simpo Two

85,595 posts

266 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
Redmax said:
This bit makes me nauseous every time I see it - reminds me of a wild west-themed pub with a wagon wheel on the wall.

That's like well nasty man, you need to redo that so they're all vertical and stuff.

Redmax said:
I think the reason for the layout at the bottom is that if the bottom couple of stepss didn't come back on themselves (so they're in the same plane as the main flight), they'd be pretty much in front of the living room doors.
My stairs end 8" from the front door, it works fine.

Or - how about ditching BOTH bends and coming down in one straight flight - is there room for that?

Redmax said:
I think the bit I find most offensive (apart from the colour and style) is that boxed-in section. It makes it look so 'heavy', and I suspect would look better opened up.
A straight flight, if room permits, would wipe it out at a stroke. Failing that a quick fix would be to paint it white.

Whoever built that staircase should be banned from building staircases!



Redmax

Original Poster:

752 posts

214 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Whoever built that staircase should be banned from building staircaes!
I agree!

Laurel Green

30,783 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
Redmax said:
You think the bottom step arrangement is bad? This bit makes me nauseous every time I see it - reminds me of a wild west-themed pub with a wagon wheel on the wall.

I'd say it does not comply with planning regs either.

mgtony

4,022 posts

191 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
I'd say it does not comply with planning regs either.
Agree, 100mm max between spindles. Imagine a baby or child crawling along that landing heading towards that large opening between the floor and first angled spindle. yikes

If you change the staircase layout, you'll have to re-tile the floor because of the tile pattern, the tiles might be laid upto and not under the stairs aswell, so simply opening up the boxing bit may not be an easy option either.
If you removed the angled spindles and squared it off with a bit of studwork, painted it all white and went for a light coloured berber type carpet, it could make all the difference, would get rid of that "ranch" look! smile

Redmax

Original Poster:

752 posts

214 months

Saturday 30th July 2011
quotequote all
Thankfully there aren't any suicidal babies in the household so I won't worry about the current compliance or not with building regs, and the staircase design I have in mind will make it easy to either make or modify spindles for the 'wagon wheel' area that are vertical yet in proportion to the full-size ones.

The tiles will be replaced when I decorate the hall so now big deal on that front.

Cheers

Multistorey

2 posts

148 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
Have you looked at james grace staircase renovations. Had them round ourselves as well as neville Johnson and they were a lot less and equally professional. Great job! See there website www.staircase-renovations.co.uk.

whoami

13,151 posts

241 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
Multistorey said:
Have you looked at james grace staircase renovations. Had them round ourselves as well as neville Johnson and they were a lot less and equally professional. Great job! See there website www.staircase-renovations.co.uk.
Why did you edit you post from your "neighbour" to yourself?

Simpo Two

85,595 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
Because he wanted to make his advert look less blatent? All the signs - just joined, fabbo review, weblink...

roofer

5,136 posts

212 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
mgtony said:
I would say that your spindles are in upside down, might just be me though. smile
Correct.