What type of tree is this?

Author
Discussion

CoolHands

Original Poster:

18,604 posts

195 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
anyone know?

thanks






mrsshpub

904 posts

184 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
It looks like a sycamore.

CoolHands

Original Poster:

18,604 posts

195 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
thanks looks like you could be right:





ps I thought for a moment your username was Mrs Shrub!

mrsshpub

904 posts

184 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
ps I thought for a moment your username was Mrs Shrub!
laugh

dudleybloke

19,802 posts

186 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all

caiss4

1,874 posts

197 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
If it is a sycamore then I advise strongly to remove it. They are the weeds of the tree world. Fast growing and constantly dropping tree litter plus sticky sap.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
I'd agree. They do actually have good wildlife value, but it looks like a particularly poor specimen, so I'd chuck it out.

CoolHands

Original Poster:

18,604 posts

195 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
ok thanks. I've read they get massive and it isn't a suitable site for that. The trunk is still quite narrow so I will remove asap

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
ok thanks. I've read they get massive and it isn't a suitable site for that. The trunk is still quite narrow so I will remove asap
Good move - hateful things!

CoolHands

Original Poster:

18,604 posts

195 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
got it down - and a couple of other young nippers that were eagerly sprouting nearby. There is also one other which I will get another day. Once the site is cleared I may plant a more suitable tree like a silver birch.

Turn7

23,591 posts

221 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
No.3...The Larch.... smile

elanfan

5,517 posts

227 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
Sycamore - they drop those little spinners everywhere and multiply like a chavette slapper waiting on benefits.

Even from quite young they are difficult to pull up - non native species that shouldn't even be here.

Be very careful about planting any trees in that space as you could cause subsidence issues in surrounding walls/buildings. A large tree can take 1000 gallons of water a day from the surrounding soil.

Simpo Two

85,349 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
I don't think my garden has 1,000 gallons of water in it...

I had an acacia about two feet from my house wall that grew to at least 30 feet and had a 12" diameter trunk. After about 20 years I cut it down because it was still growing, but it never caused any problems with the house.

Shaolin

2,955 posts

189 months

Saturday 19th April 2014
quotequote all
It's a horse chestnut - conker tree. Leaves too big and shiny and sub-divided for a sycamore. Leave the flowers to emerge if you want to be sure.

dickymint

24,260 posts

258 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Shaolin said:
It's a horse chestnut - conker tree. Leaves too big and shiny and sub-divided for a sycamore. Leave the flowers to emerge if you want to be sure.
Nope it's definitely Sycamore. Horse Chestnut buds are totally different and are very sticky.

paulw123

3,201 posts

190 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
100% a Sycamore

bigee

1,485 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
My first thoughts where 'horse chestnut'...in initial pics the leaves did look suitably sticky...but its always harder to plant ID from a pic,need to see it in situ to be sure (otherwise run the risk of looking like a know all who knows F all....)

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

222 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
paulw123 said:
100% a Sycamore
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This, it's a forest tree, and has no place in your garden against that wall.