Field behind our property will be a housing estate

Field behind our property will be a housing estate

Author
Discussion

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
funkyrobot said:
Nerfbat said:
I feel your pain - several years ago we had new housing built on the field that used to be behind our house. Our garden contains a lot of very large trees, and they built the new houses too close to our boundary, so we now get complaints about the trees blocking their light, acorns making lots of noise when they drop on their shed roofs and other similarly daft complaints.The trees were there when you bought the flaming houses !
This is our concern with the large tree at the end of the garden. What if someone moves in and then moans about some of the above?
Not your problem (unless the tree is knowingly left in a dangerous state):

http://www.problemneighbours.co.uk/problems-with-n...
What I mean is it would be a shame if the tree was cut because they moaned. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
If the consent says that the trees remain then thats good, but keep yourself up to date with applications to vary conditions and submissions to discharge pre-commencement conditions, these are off most people's radar and things like a landscaping condition can be used to remove trees that people thought woul dbe staying.
Thanks for the advice. Will do. thumbup

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
The tree belongs to the landowner - and they can pretty much do what they want with it as long as it isn't subject to a preservation order. As somebody else suggested - plant some trees on your side of the boundary wink
Indeed. It would be a shame. But like you say, nothing we can do about it.

We'll try the preservation order and get planting. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
TTmonkey said:
funkyrobot said:
Both of them?

wink
Is your house on rightmove yet? would love to see it....
Just sold it. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
It wasn't established when it was new. It was unnecessary, ugly, unwelcome, horrid, a blight, etc. Except it isn't any of those things now. It's your lovely house and nobody wants to knock it down any more.

What's different to the new ones in the field?
It wasn't part of a development cramming 169 other properties into the same, small area for a start.
The owner of a local fish and chip shop needed a house, so it was built (that trumps everything because we all need fish and chips).
As far as I'm aware (and I'm re-iterating this), it wasn't built at the end of anyone's garden. It was built an a road in-between a town and a village. Who would complain about that?

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Join in. Buy as many Off Plan as a BTL as your finances will allow. thumbup
hehe

I hope the houses they build in the field are better than the buldings they put on an estate near the village. A gust of wind blew the top part of the walls out of two of them. Their response was it wasn't their responsbility to fix it, but they would do it anyway. The houses were only a few years old. eek

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Harry Flashman said:
YTou can't accuse someone of being racist and then expect them not to debate it! Well, you can, but it's a bit stupid.

OP - feel for you, but we have a housing shortage, and they have to be built somewhere...
Suppose so. Oh well. I have some planting to get on with. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
garyhun said:
The lesson for anyone purchasing a house overlooking fields; they may not be fields for ever.

OP - what sort of fields? I'm assuming not part of a working farm but just open space?
Working field. Has been worked by a farmer for the last few years we have been there.

I don't think the farmer was the sole owner of the field. When I investigated the planning application I noticed that his name, a local large solicitors or accounting firm and some other businesses were mentioned.

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Harry Flashman said:
[

YTou can't accuse someone of being racist and then expect them not to debate it! Well, you can, but it's a bit stupid.

OP - feel for you, but we have a housing shortage, and they have to be built somewhere...
I agree. I didn't accuse anyone of anything.

Spalding and most of the rest of Lincolnshire has had a large influx of Eastern Europeans, mostly Poles (I think) with the standard associated 'problems'. I suspect that the population growth behind this proposed development is largely down to these incomers, or at least that'll be the perception. The OP is clearly fed up with the whole situation but why did he need to use an adjective when he mentioned mini markets if there is no underlying xenophobia? I suspect he also believes that the "spit, urine, dog st and litter" is also a problem which has only arisen since the 'Europeans' started arriving.

I asked a question. The OP hasn't answered it.
confused

You did accuse me of being racist.

I said European mini markets because that is what they are. Some of them are even branded as being so. If they were all Polish, I would have said so.

Where did I say that the problem is related specifically to 'Europeans'?

And you accuse me of being dim? Wow.

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
Sorry but Spalding is going down hill because of economic decline and improved road links to bigger urban centres like Peterborough, not because of planning decisions. Also, wrt to retail, unless it is a change of use class, it's not a planning issue. The European mini marts have sprung up to serve the growing Eastern European community in and around Spalding
Good job I don't live in Spalding. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
surveyor said:
Nah Spalding is going down hill because it's a st-hole. And I live in Doncaster!
yes

We moved down the road a few years ago because we got sick of the state of the place. Drove down there a few days ago to visit the vet we use and it looked even worse.

Pothole - this is purely because of the bloody immigrants. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
br d said:
sc0tt said:
funkyrobot said:
sc0tt said:
what town do you live in
I live near Spalding, Lincs.
Thanks, will give it a miss.
Oh dear, sorry but that was bloody hilarious!

Sat on me own in a pub and roared out laughing, worth the strange looks though. Well done Scott.
It would be even funnier if you could read.

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Who is a NIMBY?

There is more to this thread than a view.

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
funkyrobot said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Who is a NIMBY?

There is more to this thread than a view.
There's the flood plains to start with...
Oh yes. I need to address my racism too. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Steady, that was nearly racist. smile

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Nimby said:
funkyrobot said:
Who is a NIMBY?
Um ... me?
clap

Can you come to my house and help with the cause?

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
I'd be gutted, buy a nice house in the country and some feckers essentially build a village around you.

I live in a new build and they had to build social housing mixed in as part of the deal, you can imagine how shocked I was to see the police breaking down the door of the property opposite looking for a nigerian that stabbed someone in his first week in the country, then there are the waynettas that wear dressing gowns all day while "avin a fag" outside their front doors. One particularly nice family puts their dining furniture in the front garden to sit on while they watch destiny destroy the flower beds.

Then it seems every other house is a BTL and are rented out to waynettas, last saturday a nice couple were fighting in the parking area, he was shouting at her to put the scissors down.

Good luck, I'm moving asap.
Oh dear. Hope you can get sorted soon.

We'll have a ditch and a few fences between us and the gits. I'm thinking of building a few sangars and placing some claymores in the ditch.

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st March 2015
quotequote all
homeimprovements said:
Do you live in Pinchbeck Funkyrobot
Yes.

But you can give it a miss if you want to. wink

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st March 2015
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
I'm guessing between Moulton and Spalding
Close.

And again, either can be given a miss. wink

funkyrobot

Original Poster:

18,789 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st March 2015
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Sheepshanks said:
kambites said:
We don't have enough houses, they've got to build more somewhere...
There's a million of 'em sitting empty.
Where? Plus stock has to be got got purpose.
It is a damn shame that empty houses can't be utilised.

I've been reading a little more into the planning for the build behind us. Every concern (and I mean literally everything) has been ignored. The agenda/minutes of the meeting state all of our rejections. However, the response to everything is that South Holland needs 5000 houses over the next few years so tough luck.

It seems that the '5000 houses' label is being used to quash anything we have questioned.

Also, the local education establishments have indicated that they would need £800,000 to find the places and infrastructure updates for the potential families that could be moving in. The planning committee have only asked for the £200,000.

I'm not a developer and I'm not a planner, so I may be wrong. But isn't that a little odd? The build is obviously going to happen, but it is highly annoying that every objection is overridden with a 'we need x amount of houses so tough' response.