Neighbour's tree to front boundary

[Pferdestarke]

The tree in question belongs to my neighbour and is planted, established, inside his boundary next to the fence.

It overhangs our driveway and we cut back accordingly when we choose without issue.

It is seemingly allowed to grow on their side by them - never being cut back. Now it is overhanging the pavement just outside my driveway and must be 14 feet tall and a good 8 across. It is causing bird mess on the cars and blocking a bit of light.

I am in the process of discussing with them the possibility of giving it a trim together but just want to know what the legal standpoint is regarding trees at the front at boundaries between none-joined properties.

Wanting to avoid a confrontation on the matter with a fairly well informed yet slightly unreasonable neighbour who is likely quite knowledgeable on the matter given his job.

Any help appreciated.

[Mr GrimNasty]

You've got no right to claim nuisance from bird mess, leaves, fruit, aphids, loss of TV signal etc.
You can trim to your boundary as you know.
Council/highways may insist on cut/cut and charge, if road/path is obstructed, otherwise won't be interested.
If you do it (cut not to your own boundary) without permission it's criminal damage/theft.

[Drogo]

Call me a tree hugger but can you not just wash the cars and switch a light on?

[Yabu]

Has your home insurance got anything about size of trees and proximity to your property mentioned in it?

Or the Normal ph answer = copper nails

[Vincecj]

There should be 7'clearance over the pavement and 17'over the highway. If anything less than this, report it to the Highways department of the local council.

[herewego]

If you're cutting branches back to the boundary I don't see how it is the cause of bird mess on your car.