My house hasn't appreciated in value in 12 years

My house hasn't appreciated in value in 12 years

Author
Discussion

konark

1,113 posts

120 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
tight fart said:
I’d say this thread qualifies as one of the most stupid I’ve seen.
Sadly I'd say it's not even top 10 per cent.

bennno

11,661 posts

270 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
AB said:
I try not to think about it.

£1.85m purchase price, £300k spent so far in last 18 months (£180k of that on new windows and kitchen!), add in the stamp duty on it and it's worth nowhere f'ing near what we've spent and won't be for a very, very long time!

If you keep a running tally, you'll always end up kicking yourself if you've done it purely for financial reasons.
How many windows do you have?!
For £180k I’m hoping it’s a glass facade, plus a German kitchen with at least 4-6 ovens and a built in bean to cup coffee machine.


wisbech

2,980 posts

122 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
If houses didn't keep going up in value, we wouldn't bother to maintain them. We'd just burn them down and buy another.
This is the Japanese approach. Land has value, but the building on it depreciates and is replaced with another (expected life 30-40 years or so)

Partly cultural adaption to frequent earthquakes, so traditional Japanese houses were deliberately flimsy/ lightweight construction (faster/ cheaper to rebuild, and less likely to crush you)

Kermit power

28,691 posts

214 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
The house that I bought for £56k. (In 1998) There was one around the corner with a brand new kitchen for £65k. "Beautifully" decorated throughout. Expensive fire place.

Both my wife and I couldn't pay £9k extra for someone else's hideous choices. Could not fault the quality. Could fault the aesthetic vibe.

I'm still kicking myself. It had a bigger garage.
In similar vein, when we got to one of the houses we viewed last time we moved, the estate agent proffered CSI plastic overshoes to us, saying the owners had just had brand new carpet fitted throughout the house.

White....

Not cream, not beige but absolutely, totally white, like a fresh snowfall on a bright, sunny day in every single room in the house bar the kitchen!!!

It was lovely quality, clearly really expensive and still had a really strong new carpet smell, but who on earth wants a completely white carpet in a family home with young kids?

Our feedback to the agent was that we liked the house, but that we'd have to consider the cost of completely recarpeting if we did make an offer. He said we were the fifth showing in the property and everyone else had said exactly the same thing. I didn't envy him having to go back to his client to tell them that the many thousands of pounds they'd just spent on this new carpet had directly reduced the value of their home!

dickymint

24,412 posts

259 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Craigyboy143 said:
this is why property isn't a good investment.


if you want good returns with tiny fees and easy to sell, stocks are the only way.
Worked for me. Bought my first house for £65k with cash. 2 up 2 down mid terraced cottage, no garden, no parking. Spent about £2k on new bathroom and kitchen. Lived there for 4 very happy years until I married and moved into what is now our forever home in the same town. Here's the 'uplift'..........





£100,000 in 4/5 years Kerching !!

bennno

11,661 posts

270 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Worked for me. Bought my first house for £65k with cash. 2 up 2 down mid terraced cottage, no garden, no parking. Spent about £2k on new bathroom and kitchen. Lived there for 4 very happy years until I married and moved into what is now our forever home in the same town. Here's the 'uplift'..........





£100,000 in 4/5 years Kerching !!
yeh but the OP is factoring in 12 years of mortgage payments against that uplift

he's missed that its been a place to live for 12 years and factoring in the alternative rental costs during the same time period

blueg33

35,993 posts

225 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
If houses didn't keep going up in value, we wouldn't bother to maintain them. We'd just burn them down and buy another.
Disagree. It’s quite expensive to build a house. Land makes up between 25 and 50 percent of the price depending on location.

bennno

11,661 posts

270 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Disagree. It’s quite expensive to build a house. Land makes up between 25 and 50 percent of the price depending on location.
But thats perhaps how and what we build them from..... guess in Japan they kit build for 25 year lifespan.

fat80b

2,286 posts

222 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Good thread.

There’s an obsession in this country about how high house prices are, but it doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.

I’ve always thought that it’s one of those media induced madnesses where everyone wants to believe that their house price will make them rich because they “want it to be true” so are prepared to ignore the data….

I.e, Everywhere you look there are articles saying that house prices are too high and have been rising forever but if you actually look at the numbers and factor in inflation, they’ve barely risen at all in the last 25 years which is when lots of us here probably first bought?

The graph on https://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/indices-nationwi... clearly shows that they haven’t risen for 20 odd years.

I don’t know why people let themselves believe that house prices were going up when the (inflation adjusted) data doesn’t show it.

And if you consider the cost of maintenance etc, just as the op does it’s not such a great investment at all.


That said, I subscribe to the “house prices don’t really matter” philosophy. The real value of a house is the fact that once you’ve paid off your mortgage you get to live in it for another 30 years rent free at which it point doesn’t matter if it costs twice as much to begin with because it’s still cheap overall

AyBee

10,536 posts

203 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I didn't realise Zoopla had a facility to insert home improvements?

lizardbrain

2,011 posts

38 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
If you are just looking at capital appreciation , it doesn't make much sense to include mortgage interest. personally I would put this under the yield aspect and balance against equivalent rent?

GasEngineer

955 posts

63 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I don't know how you would calculate it, but it would be interesting to know the value if you had done nothing at all to the house since you bought it.

rossub

4,465 posts

191 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
OP - be glad you don't live where I live

House prices are still below the 2007 peak. Thankfully we bought in the 2009 dip, but very little equity gained on the increase since then.


Tim Cognito

322 posts

8 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
AB said:
50ish sash windows of various sizes and a few external doors with another few small standard windows.
Only 50? We had a outside house commissioned for our cat to go in bad weather with more than that.

Voldemort

6,159 posts

279 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Tim Cognito said:
Only 50? We had a outside house commissioned for our cat to go in bad weather with more than that.

Chamon_Lee

3,801 posts

148 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
you've summed up the biggest con of this century. a few made big bucks the rest just signed up to the debt imprisonment without knowing it.

I am being a bit harsh as we essentially pay for the roof on our head but its not this life changing asset people harp on about especially if you ride it out to a full term of 25-35 years

Sporky

6,322 posts

65 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Doesn't this mean that you've lived in your house - and upgraded it - for a dozen years for free?

Shnozz

27,503 posts

272 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Who the fk takes into account mortgage interest in considering whether their property has increased in value? Never heard anyone do that before.

Jasmine1

Original Poster:

163 posts

84 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
fat80b said:
Good thread.

There’s an obsession in this country about how high house prices are, but it doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.

I’ve always thought that it’s one of those media induced madnesses where everyone wants to believe that their house price will make them rich because they “want it to be true” so are prepared to ignore the data….

I.e, Everywhere you look there are articles saying that house prices are too high and have been rising forever but if you actually look at the numbers and factor in inflation, they’ve barely risen at all in the last 25 years which is when lots of us here probably first bought?

The graph on https://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/indices-nationwi... clearly shows that they haven’t risen for 20 odd years.

I don’t know why people let themselves believe that house prices were going up when the (inflation adjusted) data doesn’t show it.

And if you consider the cost of maintenance etc, just as the op does it’s not such a great investment at all.


That said, I subscribe to the “house prices don’t really matter” philosophy. The real value of a house is the fact that once you’ve paid off your mortgage you get to live in it for another 30 years rent free at which it point doesn’t matter if it costs twice as much to begin with because it’s still cheap overall
This is exactly what I am getting at.

The whole thing is disingenuous and a bit of a scam.

Sure, it's better than renting, but buying a house that already has more modern fittings and investing the difference in a global tracker is probably the better move.

Jasmine1

Original Poster:

163 posts

84 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
tight fart said:
I’d say this thread qualifies as one of the most stupid I’ve seen.
That's quite an achievement, thank you!

JackJarvis said:
This thread is like the retirement ones, seems to only exist to facilitate the humble brag.
No idea how you came to that conclusion, did you miss the point where I said I am basically in negative equity?