Complaint against an airline - impounded Skydive Gear

Complaint against an airline - impounded Skydive Gear

Author
Discussion

sneijder

5,221 posts

235 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
BigJonMcQuimm said:
Hi

Many thanks for offering your help.

It is not the parachute buy the Cypres AAD. When travelling, if asked, we provide the travel card :- https://downloads.cypres.aero/airtravel/

As mentioned IATA came back and stated the explosive and lithium battery are within carry on limits.
I remember similar issues when folk started flying more and more with ski avalanche packs...

Airlines have been very much in catch up mode with regards to lithium power units for the past 18 months when 'balance boards' from China started spontaneously combusting. There's no clear rules with regards to genuine mobility equipment, some airlines are switched on and if wheelchair lithium batteries are removeable, they're best in the cabin with the passenger....In the meantime training material still describes spillable wet batteries which are totally redundant.

You'd be best trying to contact the ground handling agents station manager if possible, if the airline are self handling look for the airline services manager at that station. You'll get a quicker response, going through top CEO level adds a filter of someone trying to cover their arse.

BigJonMcQuimm

Original Poster:

975 posts

213 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
sneijder said:
I remember similar issues when folk started flying more and more with ski avalanche packs...

Airlines have been very much in catch up mode with regards to lithium power units for the past 18 months when 'balance boards' from China started spontaneously combusting. There's no clear rules with regards to genuine mobility equipment, some airlines are switched on and if wheelchair lithium batteries are removeable, they're best in the cabin with the passenger....In the meantime training material still describes spillable wet batteries which are totally redundant.

You'd be best trying to contact the ground handling agents station manager if possible, if the airline are self handling look for the airline services manager at that station. You'll get a quicker response, going through top CEO level adds a filter of someone trying to cover their arse.
I can understand with new technology how airlines could be chasing their tails.

However, the unit was sanctioned by the CASA and Australian Government in 1996.

The new IATA regulations in 2015 regarding lithium batteries are exempt for the unit, being self contained and having .99g of lithium.

There is no reason what so ever Qantas can classify Sports Parachutes as Dangerous Goods.

How can any skydivers travel and compete going forward? It is totally bonkers and insane.


edit : How can it take 6 days to get a clear answer from their DG department?

Edited by BigJonMcQuimm on Saturday 7th January 21:06

hairyben

8,516 posts

184 months

Saturday 7th January 2017
quotequote all
Probably a long shot but if its any help I'll be in melbourne on tuesday and flying back to london on weds via royal brunei, if a body on the ground can be of any use.

Jazzy Jag

3,431 posts

92 months

Sunday 8th January 2017
quotequote all
hairyben said:
Probably a long shot but if its any help I'll be in melbourne on tuesday and flying back to london on weds via royal brunei, if a body on the ground can be of any use.
"Did you pack this luggage yourself, sir?"
" No , I'm carrying for a bloke on the internet"

What could possibly go wrong?
:ROFL:

Puggit

48,476 posts

249 months

Sunday 8th January 2017
quotequote all
sneijder said:
This is my line of work
:wave: Are you still at that Scandinavian outstation?

BigJonMcQuimm

Original Poster:

975 posts

213 months

Sunday 8th January 2017
quotequote all
Puggit said:
:wave: Are you still at that Scandinavian outstation?
Clearly not Qantas's .... one full week - and still awaiting from Dangerous Goods.

What is that all about? Surely this is a simple yes/no - or are they concerned for compo?

sneijder

5,221 posts

235 months

Monday 9th January 2017
quotequote all
Puggit said:
:wave: Are you still at that Scandinavian outstation?
Aye, somewhat expanded since I saw you last. We have nearly half the traffic now.

tvrforever

3,182 posts

266 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
what's happened since? is it all still "held in transit"?

The Moose

22,867 posts

210 months

Sunday 15th January 2017
quotequote all
It sounds like there's multiple people's equipment here?

How much has each person lost out by?

RSpiston

122 posts

96 months

Monday 18th March 2019
quotequote all
Any update OP ?!

Simon Brooks

1,517 posts

252 months

Wednesday 20th March 2019
quotequote all
Is it worth reporting the confiscation as theft by the airline as its been retained without due regard for the current official IATA regulations, which the airlines are obliged to comply with

Gav147

979 posts

162 months

Wednesday 20th March 2019
quotequote all
Simon Brooks said:
Is it worth reporting the confiscation as theft by the airline as its been retained without due regard for the current official IATA regulations, which the airlines are obliged to comply with
It might have been 2 and a bit years ago!

Simon Brooks

1,517 posts

252 months

Wednesday 20th March 2019
quotequote all
Gav147 said:
It might have been 2 and a bit years ago!

Whoops my bad. Didn’t notice topic start date. Just saw the prompt and assumed it was recent Would still be really interested in outcome from OP

Ken Figenus

5,714 posts

118 months

Thursday 21st March 2019
quotequote all
Bit lame to take all that advice and like the support but then leave it all up in the aireek