Things that annoy you beyond reason...? [Vol 2]

[MartG]

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

Another grudge artiste, or is it that you want to be one of the pack?

Nope, just totally fed up of you continually tainting every thread in which you post

Come on then, tt, post one single example of a thread I have tainted, or shut the fk up.

Errr - this one !

Now quote the point at which I tainted it. Or admit thatr you are full of st.

CBA to look back through all your drivel - but the fact that you've filled several pages with posts arguing with several people rather than anything remotely on topic for the thread is pretty conclusive

[singlecoil]

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

Another grudge artiste, or is it that you want to be one of the pack?

Nope, just totally fed up of you continually tainting every thread in which you post

Come on then, tt, post one single example of a thread I have tainted, or shut the fk up.

Errr - this one !

Now quote the point at which I tainted it. Or admit thatr you are full of st.

CBA to look back through all your drivel - but the fact that you've filled several pages with posts arguing with several people rather than anything remotely on topic for the thread is pretty conclusive

Thank you for confirming that you are either a liar or a misguided fool. Or basically, easily led. You've seen a few others have a go at me and you've thought, "ooh goody, the PH pack is running, best I join in" but suddenly the quarry has turned around and bit you on the nose.

Didn't you see them fail the "quote an example" challenge too? It's all very well to accuse me of this and accuse me of that, but now you are being called upon to put up or shut up, and you are going to have to do the second because your aggressive attack on me is based on rumour and not fact. The parallel with witch hunts is obvious, I can just see you with a pitchfork and straw in your hair.

[MartG]

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

MartG said:

singlecoil said:

Another grudge artiste, or is it that you want to be one of the pack?

Nope, just totally fed up of you continually tainting every thread in which you post

Come on then, tt, post one single example of a thread I have tainted, or shut the fk up.

Errr - this one !

Now quote the point at which I tainted it. Or admit thatr you are full of st.

CBA to look back through all your drivel - but the fact that you've filled several pages with posts arguing with several people rather than anything remotely on topic for the thread is pretty conclusive

Thank you for confirming that you are either a liar or a misguided fool. Or basically, easily led. You've seen a few others have a go at me and you've thought, "ooh goody, the PH pack is running, best I join in" but suddenly the quarry has turned around and bit you on the nose.

Didn't you see them fail the "quote an example" challenge too? It's all very well to accuse me of this and accuse me of that, but now you are being called upon to put up or shut up, and you are going to have to do the second because your aggressive attack on me is based on rumour and not fact. The parallel with witch hunts is obvious, I can just see you with a pitchfork and straw in your hair.

You just don't get it, do you - people are just fed up of you depositing your vitriol in multiple threads. Why don't you just create a thread entitled 'Singlecoil's argument thread' where you can post away to your hearts content - and fk the hell off out of this one !

[PoleDriver]

Might be handy if you all took this elsewhere! You all seem to be getting annoyed, but not "beyond reason!"

Back on thread... Idiots who bid and win for a car then call to ask questions about it!

The time for that is before you bid, you win it, you bought it!

[singlecoil]

MartG said:

You just don't get it, do you - people are just fed up of you depositing your vitriol in multiple threads. Why don't you just create a thread entitled 'Singlecoil's argument thread' where you can post away to your hearts content - and fk the hell off out of this one !

I'm going to help you out here, because I don't really want you to go on looking like a fool who has bitten off a little bit more than he can chew. Right, earlier you accused me of being aggressive. I'm expect you understand that aggression is all about starting aconflict. But maybe what you don't understand is the importance of the 'start' in that definition. Somebody who is only responding to the opening moves in a conflict is not being aggressive, they are just reacting.

So it's easy enough, all you have to do to prove your point is to find a conflict on this thread, or any other for that matter, which I started. You do that, and I'm off. There. That's a prize worth winning, surely? That's what you've been hoping for. Trouble is, of course, and as I expect you've already had a look back and found out for yourself, there isn't one.


So, I wonder what your response is going to be this time. Best would be silence, actually, thinking about, best would be you admitting that you were simply following what a couple of others have said and assuming that I was aggressive, when in fact, as you have confirmed by reading back through, I am nothing of the sort.

But I'd be very surprised if that happened. I expect your response will be something along the lines of "everybody else says you are aggressive", or "I can't be bothered to read back through all of your ste" or something equally low brow.

[singlecoil]

PoleDriver said:

Might be handy if you all took this elsewhere! You all seem to be getting annoyed, but not "beyond reason!"

Back on thread... Idiots who bid and win for a car then call to ask questions about it!

The time for that is before you bid, you win it, you bought it!

I couldn't agree more (with both points).

[PoleDriver]

singlecoil said:

PoleDriver said:

Might be handy if you all took this elsewhere! You all seem to be getting annoyed, but not "beyond reason!"

Back on thread... Idiots who bid and win for a car then call to ask questions about it!

The time for that is before you bid, you win it, you bought it!

I couldn't agree more (with both points).

[singlecoil]

PoleDriver said:

singlecoil said:

PoleDriver said:

Might be handy if you all took this elsewhere! You all seem to be getting annoyed, but not "beyond reason!"

Back on thread... Idiots who bid and win for a car then call to ask questions about it!

The time for that is before you bid, you win it, you bought it!

I couldn't agree more (with both points).

I'll take this opportunity to say that if everyone else is prepared to drop this line of aggreavation then I am too. If they want to keep on with it then I expect I will respond, but I too would prefer it if it were to stop right here.

[Big Al.]

Please put the handbags back in the wardrobe guys, and cool it a little.

Ta muchly.

[Tyre Tread]

Hugo a Gogo said:

Tyre Tread said:

people who start posts with 'So....'

Tyre Tread said:

So is saying: I know something annoys you and there is no real reason for doing it but I'm going to do it anyway so live with it!

minor editing, to remove a vital comma

I noticed as I was typing it but thought that most of the people on here would be intelligent enough to realise legitimate usage versus the unnecessary usage. I thought only the stupid would point out the correct usage. Maybe I was right.

[singlecoil]

It annoys me quite a lot that an idle Google enquiry, made weeks ago and fully answered at the time, is still causing advertisments for the products in question to appear on various Pistonheads pages.

[Fabric]

singlecoil said:

It annoys me quite a lot that an idle Google enquiry, made weeks ago and fully answered at the time, is still causing advertisments for the products in question to appear on various Pistonheads pages.

Heard of Adblock? I can't remember the last time I saw an advert on PH.

[singlecoil]

Fabric said:

singlecoil said:

It annoys me quite a lot that an idle Google enquiry, made weeks ago and fully answered at the time, is still causing advertisments for the products in question to appear on various Pistonheads pages.

Heard of Adblock? I can't remember the last time I saw an advert on PH.

I didn't think we're supposed to do stuff like that you know, those adverts help pay the rent.

[Pothole]

DrTre said:

Pothole said:

ou mean he didn't get it from Miranda Hart? OK.

Ah well if he did, he's the one who benefitted from the exposure.

ETA and he didn't invent it, he says he overheard it so yes you're entirely probably correct.

FETA really bizarrely whenever I quote you, and only you, it drops the first letter from your post!?

Edited by DrTre on Saturday 28th April 11:37

Lots of peoples' quotes of my posts do that..just another way that I'm special!

[Pothole]

singlecoil said:

Somebody who is only responding to the opening moves in a conflict is not being aggressive, they are just reacting.

siglecoil said:

The problem for you lot, or it would be if you weren't so thick, is that the ONLY time I'm aggressive is when someone is aggressive to me first.

Me no understandee. I must be that thick, I suppose.

[singlecoil]

Pothole said:

Me no understandee. I must be that thick, I suppose.

Are you a G&S fan? There's a line from Lord Moutararat that would fit very well here.

[Pothole]

singlecoil said:

Pothole said:

Me no understandee. I must be that thick, I suppose.

Are you a G&S fan? There's a line from Lord Moutararat that would fit very well here.

Are you? do you mean the Earl of Mountararat?

[singlecoil]

Pothole said:

singlecoil said:

Pothole said:

Me no understandee. I must be that thick, I suppose.

Are you a G&S fan? There's a line from Lord Moutararat that would fit very well here.

Are you? do you mean the Earl of Mountararat?

Yes I am. Sorry about the typo, and Earls will quite often be referred to as Lords (which they are, of course). Check the libretto if you're that bothered. Read it carefully and you might even spot the earlier reference (and develop an appreciation for one of our greatest dramatists in the process).

[Pothole]

singlecoil said:

Pothole said:

singlecoil said:

Pothole said:

Me no understandee. I must be that thick, I suppose.

Are you a G&S fan? There's a line from Lord Moutararat that would fit very well here.

Are you? do you mean the Earl of Mountararat?

Yes I am. Sorry about the typo, and Earls will quite often be referred to as Lords (which they are, of course). Check the libretto if you're that bothered. Read it carefully and you might even spot the earlier reference (and develop an appreciation for one of our greatest dramatists in the process).

Always an excuse, always some pompous bks. Either quote the line or leave it.

[singlecoil]

Pothole said:

Always an excuse, always some pompous bks. Either quote the line or leave it.

Consider it left.

As hopefully this whole 'thing' will be.