Juvenile things that make you snigger.

[MartG]

[ClockworkCupcake]

[OldSpice]

ClockworkCupcake said:

Fantastic!

[dudleybloke]

[anonymous-user]

straight dad said:

If your of an age:

Chelmsford, next to the Marconi building? I giggle even I see it.

[Trabi601]

shakotan said:

What is this 'leftover' pizza you speak of?

It's the poor mans' equivalent of a Nigel Slater cookery programme. You, the ones where he has all that leftover caviar, truffle, fillet steak and champagne.

[MartG]

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

[8Ace]

The road layout on the TRL site in Crowthorne.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3808579,-0.78656...

[anonymous-user]

MartG said:

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

For a Renault, that's held together quite well

[PanzerCommander]

MartG said:

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

Thankfully the pilot and passenger got out without injury. It came down shortly after takeoff; I'd guess at an engine failure just after take off. Hopefully the Tiger Moth is repairable.

[irocfan]

MartG said:

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

doesn't matter how you explain it you'll still be seen as an increased risk

[anonymous-user]

irocfan said:

MartG said:

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

doesn't matter how you explain it you'll still be seen as an increased risk

A Scenic driver IS an increased risk regardless.

[rolando]

OpulentBob said:

A Scenic driver IS an increased risk regardless.

Even when parked

[FailHere]

irocfan said:

doesn't matter how you explain it you'll still be seen as an increased risk

I would have said the opposite, the chances of your parked car being hit by an old bi-plane must be very, very small, so the chance of it happening a second time must be practically nil.



I'm over-thinking this, aren't I.

[irocfan]

FailHere said:

irocfan said:

doesn't matter how you explain it you'll still be seen as an increased risk

I would have said the opposite, the chances of your parked car being hit by an old bi-plane must be very, very small, so the chance of it happening a second time must be practically nil.



I'm over-thinking this, aren't I.

it's insurance - who needs your sort of logic? He'll be marked down because his car wasn't in a garage, had open sky above it (until it was filled by a moth), he was visiting somewhere... take your pick (all 3!)

[LaserTam]

8Ace said:

The road layout on the TRL site in Crowthorne.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3808579,-0.78656...

[loafer123]

irocfan said:

FailHere said:

irocfan said:

doesn't matter how you explain it you'll still be seen as an increased risk

I would have said the opposite, the chances of your parked car being hit by an old bi-plane must be very, very small, so the chance of it happening a second time must be practically nil.



I'm over-thinking this, aren't I.

it's insurance - who needs your sort of logic? He'll be marked down because his car wasn't in a garage, had open sky above it (until it was filled by a moth), he was visiting somewhere... take your pick (all 3!)

I know I am going to regret this but he did decide to park further onto the airfield than anyone else, in front of the hangar line.

If he had decided to park with everyone else, he wouldn't have been hit.

:coat:

[Tango13]

OpulentBob said:

MartG said:

Try explaining that to the insurance company !

For a Renault, that's held together quite well

An insect type moth would probably do a similar amount of damage

[Animal]

FailHere said:

I would have said the opposite, the chances of your parked car being hit by an old bi-plane must be very, very small, so the chance of it happening a second time must be practically nil.



I'm over-thinking this, aren't I.

Yet the number of occurrences of this happening has increased, so the number of chances in a million has probably increased, no?

[Starfighter]

Million to one chances occur 9 times out of 10.