One for the spelling police

One for the spelling police

Author
Discussion

tobinen

9,222 posts

145 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Reduced welfare spending, tax cuts for the rich, grammer schools...

singlecoil

33,581 posts

246 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
pad58 said:
We called them "Hippys" back in the day.


Man.

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
SkinnyP said:
I duno.

whoami

13,151 posts

240 months

Sunday 14th December 2014
quotequote all
Hoover. said:
The last 3 places I have worked in the last year people have their fav cereals in their draws at work

whoami

13,151 posts

240 months

Sunday 14th December 2014
quotequote all
central said:
we all know the correct term is raquets.

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Monday 15th December 2014
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
We aren't

Just we have to listen to the ones that make the most noise

Give it a decade and scotland will of left the union

20 years from now it will be a smilier situation to north/south korea
biggrin

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Monday 15th December 2014
quotequote all
dereksmith said:
The goalor asked the inspector what to do with the charge sheets and the inspector just gave him a look.

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Tuesday 16th December 2014
quotequote all
KrazyIvan said:
Invisible canoe is faster then visable one.

missingbadly999

348 posts

115 months

Tuesday 16th December 2014
quotequote all
Had a letter from my Landlord yesterday - apalling spelling, 'wker' in not spelt with a C its a K, 'prat' does not have two T's and as for it doesnt start with a K. 'Late paying bd' looks stupid spelled with an E before the R
What a

singlecoil

33,581 posts

246 months

Tuesday 16th December 2014
quotequote all
missingbadly999 said:
Thanks for being up front. I'm a bit lost with the inns and outs there but if it's so sorted why sell?

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
bazza white said:
I think sometimes sometimes people are labeled thick to quickly. Ive worked with some people who you would class thick as st, on the exterior and how they come across may be slow and lack of anything but inside their mind is sharp as, they simply think in a different way.Find that way and you can use them to your/a companies advantage. Its the middle of the stack that the problem.

5.0ltr

2,760 posts

199 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
NugentS said:
But surely crime would mean criminal offense. Kengestion charge isn't criminal...

whoami

13,151 posts

240 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
But it just highlights the problem of asperational brands in that they will attract some insecure people who want the image not the product and seek validation of wealth and success against random strangers.

All asperational brands have them but some seem more insecure and therefor offensive than others.

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
chris watton said:
ETA - Plus - my car's performance will be enhanced without spending a Penney, with the decrease in weight! lol
Toilet humour.

ATTAK Z

10,993 posts

189 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
Well firstly I'm not motivated by money that much. Secondly I couldn't charge people that amount and sleep at night, Thirdly I'm pretty well qualified in my chosen field and not adverse to study so that's got fk all to do with anything.

I just hate the fact that they charge so much because the only choice their clients have is to go to another solicitor who employs similar extortion tactics.

Don't even get me started on those car accident 'lawyers'

It's not just Solicitors, it's just things or people in life that take advantage of others. Plus most solicitors I've met have some sort of god complex

singlecoil

33,581 posts

246 months

Saturday 20th December 2014
quotequote all
hora said:
OP she probably feels very embarrassed but as its a works do (politics etc) she may feel pressured to tow the line.

RobinOakapple

2,802 posts

112 months

Sunday 21st December 2014
quotequote all
Does this count as a spelling mistake (new here so thought I would ask)?

Breadvan72 said:
I will say it again s l o w l y. Whomever is elected to lead the Government would be temporary head of state. That means that, if this system applied now, Cameron would be, for a limited time, head of state. No one else. Not someone who is distantly descended for a successful medieval warlord, not Blair, not Beckham, not someone from Strictly, just whomever heads the Government. Much like in the US and France (but not necessarily adopting every aspect of their constitutions, as we might wish to avoid the deadlock caused by legislature vs chief exec). Can you really not see beyond the transient personalities and address the principle?
It's the second whomever. Should be whoever.

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Sunday 21st December 2014
quotequote all
Fittster said:
With the collapse of the Rubble are there any cheap deals in Russia?

ATTAK Z

10,993 posts

189 months

Sunday 21st December 2014
quotequote all
rehab71 said:
gaz1234 said:
'You are bigging on a piece of paper....'?

ATTAK Z

10,993 posts

189 months

Sunday 21st December 2014
quotequote all
RobinOakapple said:
Does this count as a spelling mistake (new here so thought I would ask)?

Breadvan72 said:
I will say it again s l o w l y. Whomever is elected to lead the Government would be temporary head of state. That means that, if this system applied now, Cameron would be, for a limited time, head of state. No one else. Not someone who is distantly descended for a successful medieval warlord, not Blair, not Beckham, not someone from Strictly, just whomever heads the Government. Much like in the US and France (but not necessarily adopting every aspect of their constitutions, as we might wish to avoid the deadlock caused by legislature vs chief exec). Can you really not see beyond the transient personalities and address the principle?
It's the second whomever. Should be whoever.
and the first !