One for the spelling police
Discussion
bazza white said:
I think sometimes sometimes people are labeled thick to quickly. Ive worked with some people who you would class thick as st, on the exterior and how they come across may be slow and lack of anything but inside their mind is sharp as, they simply think in a different way.Find that way and you can use them to your/a companies advantage. Its the middle of the stack that the problem.
DonkeyApple said:
But it just highlights the problem of asperational brands in that they will attract some insecure people who want the image not the product and seek validation of wealth and success against random strangers.
All asperational brands have them but some seem more insecure and therefor offensive than others.
All asperational brands have them but some seem more insecure and therefor offensive than others.
lord trumpton said:
Well firstly I'm not motivated by money that much. Secondly I couldn't charge people that amount and sleep at night, Thirdly I'm pretty well qualified in my chosen field and not adverse to study so that's got fk all to do with anything.
I just hate the fact that they charge so much because the only choice their clients have is to go to another solicitor who employs similar extortion tactics.
Don't even get me started on those car accident 'lawyers'
It's not just Solicitors, it's just things or people in life that take advantage of others. Plus most solicitors I've met have some sort of god complex
I just hate the fact that they charge so much because the only choice their clients have is to go to another solicitor who employs similar extortion tactics.
Don't even get me started on those car accident 'lawyers'
It's not just Solicitors, it's just things or people in life that take advantage of others. Plus most solicitors I've met have some sort of god complex
Does this count as a spelling mistake (new here so thought I would ask)?
Breadvan72 said:
I will say it again s l o w l y. Whomever is elected to lead the Government would be temporary head of state. That means that, if this system applied now, Cameron would be, for a limited time, head of state. No one else. Not someone who is distantly descended for a successful medieval warlord, not Blair, not Beckham, not someone from Strictly, just whomever heads the Government. Much like in the US and France (but not necessarily adopting every aspect of their constitutions, as we might wish to avoid the deadlock caused by legislature vs chief exec). Can you really not see beyond the transient personalities and address the principle?
It's the second whomever. Should be whoever.rehab71 said:
gaz1234 said:
'You are bigging on a piece of paper....'?RobinOakapple said:
Does this count as a spelling mistake (new here so thought I would ask)?
and the first !Breadvan72 said:
I will say it again s l o w l y. Whomever is elected to lead the Government would be temporary head of state. That means that, if this system applied now, Cameron would be, for a limited time, head of state. No one else. Not someone who is distantly descended for a successful medieval warlord, not Blair, not Beckham, not someone from Strictly, just whomever heads the Government. Much like in the US and France (but not necessarily adopting every aspect of their constitutions, as we might wish to avoid the deadlock caused by legislature vs chief exec). Can you really not see beyond the transient personalities and address the principle?
It's the second whomever. Should be whoever.Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff