Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 2]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Thursday 8th January 2015
quotequote all
DannyScene said:
Based off something someone said previously, if you are in a sailing boat and you want to head south but the wind is blowing north do you have to wait for the wind to change?

I don't understand at all how a sailing boat can go up wind although I imagine it's a simple answer
No need to wait for the wind to change - it can go upwind.

Think of it like this:
Stick the sail out 45 degrees.
Like this:


Very roughly that would send the boat heading along perpendicular to the wind.
(In the picture it is going to go East with a wind from the North.)

Now imagine the wind drops completely and boat changes into a golf ball on a mini-golf course say.
It keeps heading along the course Eastwards.

BUT...
Then it hits a wall which is at 45 degrees to the direction it was going.

Sort of like this:


Obviously it will now bounce off the wall and head up towards the hole.

As a massive simplification this is the job of the centre-board in a boat.
As you point the boat into the wind - the centre-board "pushes" off the water allowing you to convert your Easterly motion into a little bit of Northerly motion i.e. into the wind.

Edited by walm on Thursday 8th January 16:22


Edited by walm on Thursday 8th January 16:22

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Thursday 8th January 2015
quotequote all
VladD said:
Boats don't get blown, they get sucked. The sail forms a similar shape to an aircraft wing and uses the equivalent of lift.

If the wind is blowing from the north then you can head north east or north west quite easily. The wind pulls the boat and the keel resits the pull in that direction and gives you forward momentum.
This is 100% wrong.
The aerofoil effect of a sail works against you when trying to beat into the wind.
Just think about the shape of the sail as you look at it on top.
Lift pulls you pretty much perpendicular to the sail - the WRONG way!!!

Vipers

32,890 posts

228 months

Thursday 8th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
VladD said:
Boats don't get blown, they get sucked. The sail forms a similar shape to an aircraft wing and uses the equivalent of lift.

If the wind is blowing from the north then you can head north east or north west quite easily. The wind pulls the boat and the keel resits the pull in that direction and gives you forward momentum.
This is 100% wrong.
The aerofoil effect of a sail works against you when trying to beat into the wind.
Just think about the shape of the sail as you look at it on top.
Lift pulls you pretty much perpendicular to the sail - the WRONG way!!!
Tacking and jibing isn't it?




smile

P.S. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacking_(sailing)

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jibe







Edited by Vipers on Thursday 8th January 20:49

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Tacking and jibing isn't it?
Well tacking and gybeing perhaps.
Not sure about your point, exactly - sorry!
I was just saying that the (tiny) aerofoil effect from a sail pulls you to leeward not windward.
To suggest a sailboat is pulled not pushed is absurd.

Vipers

32,890 posts

228 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
Vipers said:
Tacking and jibing isn't it?
Well tacking and gybeing perhaps.
Not sure about your point, exactly - sorry!
I was just saying that the (tiny) aerofoil effect from a sail pulls you to leeward not windward.
To suggest a sailboat is pulled not pushed is absurd.
Just a suggestion to the question "Based off something someone said previously, if you are in a sailing boat and you want to head south but the wind is blowing north etc etc etc. I don't understand at all how a sailing boat can go up wind although I imagine it's a simple answer"

Maybe they were not familiar with sailing boats tacking to saill against the wind. Your quote is fine.




smile

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Maybe they were not familiar with sailing boats tacking to saill against the wind. Your quote is fine.
Got it! thumbup

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
Why is everyone so thirsty these days? People can't put the bins out without taking a bottle of water with them, my car has more cup/bottle holders than seats. What's going on?

LordGrover

33,545 posts

212 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
Some schmuck decided 8 glasses of water a day is 'needed' to be healthy.
Tabloid readers believed it.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Some schmuck decided 8 glasses of water a day is 'needed' to be healthy.
Tabloid readers believed it.
someone selling mineral water decided...

FiF

44,097 posts

251 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
Vipers said:
Tacking and jibing isn't it?
Well tacking and gybeing perhaps.
Not sure about your point, exactly - sorry!
I was just saying that the (tiny) aerofoil effect from a sail pulls you to leeward not windward.
To suggest a sailboat is pulled not pushed is absurd.
It's a combination of the two. There is low pressure ahead of the sail which provides suction and pressure on the windward side of the sail.

Without a keel the boat would have such leeway that it would slide downwind at such a speed that no matter how close to the wind direction you could point the summation of the vectors meant that effectively you were not making any progress to windward.

With a keel then that leeway is reduced.

In determining a dead reckoning plot you have to determine the result of all the vectors in respect of boat speed through the water, leeway, and effect of tidal current.

If you look at the old square riggers, they could not point in any degree to windward, they had no significant keels in terms of water resistance so made massive leeway. Thus they had to wait for what was called a fair wind. It's also the reason why so many became embayed, that is onshore wind and if they couldn't anchor all they could do was sail back and forth hoping for a wind shift to allow them to escape.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Some schmuck decided 8 glasses of water a day is 'needed' to be healthy.
Tabloid readers believed it.
Specifically, someone worked out in the total amount of water absorbed in a day.

Someone else took the figure out of context, missing out the point that most of this water is contained in food.

Then the mineral water industry tried to claim that not only does all this water have to be drunk, but that water in tea coffee beer etc doesn't count and that even tap water is a bit dubious.

Even now there are people who claim that coffee dehydrates you because of the caffeine, ignoring the fact that you are taking the caffeine together with a large mug of water so still end up ahead on the deal.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
FiF said:
It's a combination of the two. There is low pressure ahead of the sail which provides suction and pressure on the windward side of the sail.
I agree but I think Vlad is probably sucked in (DYSWIDT) by the equal transit time fallacy which is often used to describe lift on wings during poorly taught GCSE physics lessons.

The reason a wing forces an aircraft up is almost entirely due to Newton's third law.
There is a crap load of air being deflected down and the equal and opposite reaction is lift.
The speed of the air on the top vs. the speed on the bottom (Bernoull's Principle) is adding to the lift but the air deflection is by far and away the most important force.


I used to demonstrate this by asking people to stick their hand outside a car window as it goes along.
You can make a rough aerofoil shape with your hand while holding it horizontal and keep it there very easily.
Now try rotating it 45 degrees so you are deflecting a bunch of air downwards. Your arm will shoot up.
That's the force that matters.

It's all here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%28force%29

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
DannyScene said:
Based off something someone said previously, if you are in a sailing boat and you want to head south but the wind is blowing north do you have to wait for the wind to change?

I don't understand at all how a sailing boat can go up wind although I imagine it's a simple answer
You can't go directly into the wind. But if you point at about 45deg to the wind and position the sails to bounce the wind over the back of the boat, then your keel prevents the boat going sideways and you travel forwards. So you can keep zig sagging and travel upwind.
Yes, it's quite similar to the way an aircraft uses trim to maintain steady course, essentially the keel allows a boat to sail closer to the wind by working two forces against each other (wind direction - rudder steer). A balancing act for person at the rudder if you will.

Nimby

4,592 posts

150 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Some schmuck decided 8 glasses of water a day is 'needed' to be healthy.
Tabloid readers believed it.
I thought the amount came originally from NASA who calculated water requirements for astronauts who were only eating dehydrated food.

Some people assumed they needed the same amount of water, on top of their normal intake of tea, coffee and normal food (which is 50% water or whatever).

VladD

7,858 posts

265 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
FiF said:
It's a combination of the two. There is low pressure ahead of the sail which provides suction and pressure on the windward side of the sail.
I agree
So I wasn't 100% wrong as you initially stated then? biggrin

FiF

44,097 posts

251 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
FiF said:
It's a combination of the two. There is low pressure ahead of the sail which provides suction and pressure on the windward side of the sail.
I agree but I think Vlad is probably sucked in (DYSWIDT) by the equal transit time fallacy which is often used to describe lift on wings during poorly taught GCSE physics lessons.

The reason a wing forces an aircraft up is almost entirely due to Newton's third law.
There is a crap load of air being deflected down and the equal and opposite reaction is lift.
The speed of the air on the top vs. the speed on the bottom (Bernoull's Principle) is adding to the lift but the air deflection is by far and away the most important force.


I used to demonstrate this by asking people to stick their hand outside a car window as it goes along.
You can make a rough aerofoil shape with your hand while holding it horizontal and keep it there very easily.
Now try rotating it 45 degrees so you are deflecting a bunch of air downwards. Your arm will shoot up.
That's the force that matters.

It's all here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%28force%29
Don't disagree with any of that but the effect of sail shape shouldn't be discounted. It's significant.

An understanding of that helped me, a "fatty", to maintain competitive boat speed in light airs against the 7 stone wet through kids in Laser races. They should have walked away from me in light airs and it used to piss them off that they didn't. Windy conditions though, yes it's tough hiking as a heavyweight but you don't half go fast. hehe

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
VladD said:
walm said:
FiF said:
It's a combination of the two. There is low pressure ahead of the sail which provides suction and pressure on the windward side of the sail.
I agree
So I wasn't 100% wrong as you initially stated then? biggrin
You know what - as I wrote that, I thought I should apologise and say "in fact Vlad wasn't 100% wrong after all".
Then I thought, "he probably hates me and hasn't read this far anyway so I can get away with it".
Damn.
Sorry!

fomb

1,402 posts

211 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
walm said:
The reason a wing forces an aircraft up is almost entirely due to Newton's third law.
There is a crap load of air being deflected down and the equal and opposite reaction is lift.
If this were true, the shape of the wing cross-section should be irrelevant.

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
fomb said:
walm said:
The reason a wing forces an aircraft up is almost entirely due to Newton's third law.
There is a crap load of air being deflected down and the equal and opposite reaction is lift.
If this were true, the shape of the wing cross-section should be irrelevant.
The Bernoulli principle. As suggested by Newton. There is less pressure above the wing due to its shape, which helps create lift.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Friday 9th January 2015
quotequote all
fomb said:
walm said:
The reason a wing forces an aircraft up is almost entirely due to Newton's third law.
There is a crap load of air being deflected down and the equal and opposite reaction is lift.
If this were true, the shape of the wing cross-section should be irrelevant.
Nope. Note that I said "almost entirely".

From the article I linked when referring to the Newtonian explanation:
"This simple explanation, while correct in as far as it goes, is not sufficiently detailed to support the precise calculations required for engineering."
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED