Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1 2 ... 41 42
44 45 ... 250 251
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Dr Jekyll

5,739 posts

131 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Inspired by a drunken discussion about whether tomato sauce would work as a puncture sealant.

Would it be possible to have a tyre that didn't need any air in it?

Filled with something solid, or at least not runny enough to leak. Or some kind of internal springing.

Given the vast amount of ingenuity devoted to tyre design I suspect not, or somebody would have done it by now. But looking at how low profile some modern tyres are it hardly seems worth putting air in them.

Shaw Tarse

19,325 posts

73 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Inspired by a drunken discussion about whether tomato sauce would work as a puncture sealant.

Would it be possible to have a tyre that didn't need any air in it?

Filled with something solid, or at least not runny enough to leak. Or some kind of internal springing.

Given the vast amount of ingenuity devoted to tyre design I suspect not, or somebody would have done it by now. But looking at how low profile some modern tyres are it hardly seems worth putting air in them.
Getting there http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=airless+tires&amp...

EDLT

14,593 posts

76 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Shaw Tarse said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Inspired by a drunken discussion about whether tomato sauce would work as a puncture sealant.

Would it be possible to have a tyre that didn't need any air in it?

Filled with something solid, or at least not runny enough to leak. Or some kind of internal springing.

Given the vast amount of ingenuity devoted to tyre design I suspect not, or somebody would have done it by now. But looking at how low profile some modern tyres are it hardly seems worth putting air in them.
Getting there http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=airless+tires&amp...
Tweels make too much noise and vibrate constantly once you get over 50mph.

R300will

3,622 posts

21 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
ATTAK Z said:
ATTAK Z said:
R300will said:
... but what you're saying doesn't make sense ...........

If that's not right i give up.
I'm going to butt in here ...
OK let's start with a vehicle with a single axle (I know there aren't any, except perhaps the Segway and a mono-cycle) ... the axle has disc brakes on each side and the vehicle is travelling from right to left when viewed from your position ... by applying the brakes consider what will happen ... the wheels are rotating anti-clockwise so when the brakes are applied, the discs will exert a force on the pads and attempt to pull the callipers (and anything else attached to the callipers) in the same direction i.e. the chassis is rotated anti-clockwise around the axle (the fulcrum) ...

this reaction will occur in exactly the same way no matter where the calliper is on the circumference of the disc

the other force that is acting is the momentum of the whole vehicle and the driver ... now since the centre of mass is usually above the axle, this additional force will act in the same direction as the braking force thus also rotating the chassis anti-clockwise around the axle ... result the chassis and the driver continues to rotate until an equal and opposite force occurs (in this case it would be the driver's head hitting the ground in front of the axle)


deep breath ...........


right, if you're still with me let's consider a vehicle with two axles … the physics will be the same for both axles and the only difference is that there are now there are two fulcra and so it becomes a bit more complicated ... so let's say you can apply the front and rear brakes separately from each other ... applying the front brakes only, the chassis will be rotated around the front axle in an anti-clockwise direction i.e. the chassis in front of the axle is forced down and the chassis behind the front axle is forced up ... and the equal and opposite force maintaining stability is gravity acting on the mass of the vehicle (the centre of gravity being to the right of the front axle and therefore providing a clockwise moment)

... applying the rear brakes only, the chassis will be rotated around the rear axle in an anti-clockwise direction i.e. again the chassis in front of the axle is forced down and the chassis behind the rear axle is forced up ... and the equal and opposite force maintaining stability is the front wheels in contact with the ground

the other force that is acting is the momentum of the whole vehicle and the driver … now since the centre of mass is above the the axle (usually but not always) this additional force will act in the same direction as the braking force thus also rotating the chassis anti-clockwise around the front axle … result the chassis and the driver continues to rotate until an equal and opposite force occurs (in this case it would be gravity as above)

so ......................

if both sets of brakes are applied together all the forces act together and the front of the car is forced down and the rear of the car is forced up

QED (hopefully) smile



Edited by ATTAK Z on Saturday 26th May 14:41
Right i'm with you, that's an excellent explanation smile

Getragdogleg

3,725 posts

53 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Re: the caliper discussion, remember that the wheel is stopped still at point of contact with the road and is travelling at twice the speed of the forward motion at the top.


Advertisement

AdeTuono

3,826 posts

97 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Getragdogleg said:
Re: the caliper discussion, remember that the wheel is stopped still at point of contact with the road and is travelling at twice the speed of the forward motion at the top.
I really, really hope that I deserve a whoooosh for this one, but...




...or was this supposed to be posted in this thread?

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Getragdogleg

3,725 posts

53 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
AdeTuono said:
Getragdogleg said:
Re: the caliper discussion, remember that the wheel is stopped still at point of contact with the road and is travelling at twice the speed of the forward motion at the top.
I really, really hope that I deserve a whoooosh for this one, but...




...or was this supposed to be posted in this thread?

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
hehe
Well the road is not moving is it, so the bit of tread touching at point of contact is not moving either.
Therefore the bit at the top is going forward in relation to the road at twice the speed of the forward motion.

Get a wheel or something that rolls and roll it on the table in front of you to see what I mean.

It's a mind bender.

ATTAK Z

2,094 posts

59 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
R300will said:
ATTAK Z said:
ATTAK Z said:
R300will said:
... but what you're saying doesn't make sense ...........

If that's not right i give up.
I'm going to butt in here ...
OK let's start with a vehicle ................and the front of the car is forced down and the rear of the car is forced up

QED (hopefully) smile
Right i'm with you, that's an excellent explanation smile
Thankyouverymuch
Regards
Elvis

ETA Sorry ... I've had ZZ Top on in the car all day singing Viva Las Vegas

Edited by ATTAK Z on Sunday 27th May 20:06

Fabric

3,067 posts

62 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Getragdogleg said:
Well the road is not moving is it, so the bit of tread touching at point of contact is not moving either.
rofl

AdeTuono

3,826 posts

97 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Getragdogleg said:
AdeTuono said:
Getragdogleg said:
Re: the caliper discussion, remember that the wheel is stopped still at point of contact with the road and is travelling at twice the speed of the forward motion at the top.
I really, really hope that I deserve a whoooosh for this one, but...




...or was this supposed to be posted in this thread?

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
hehe

Are you insane?
Well the road is not moving is it, so the bit of tread touching at point of contact is not moving either.
Therefore the bit at the top is going forward in relation to the road at twice the speed of the forward motion.

Get a wheel or something that rolls and roll it on the table in front of you to see what I mean.

It's a mind bender.

Getragdogleg

3,725 posts

53 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Fabric said:
Getragdogleg said:
Well the road is not moving is it, so the bit of tread touching at point of contact is not moving either.
rofl
You sure about that ?

The tyres are not slipping on the road are they ?

Edited by Getragdogleg on Sunday 27th May 20:07

Getragdogleg

3,725 posts

53 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
AdeTuono said:
Are you insane ?
No, quite sane and happy I have this sorted in my head better than you ...

1point7bar

1,091 posts

18 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
The contact patch must be moving at the same speed as the car, if it's in 100% traction.
The contact patch is part of the tyre.

Do I need to go on?

ATTAK Z

2,094 posts

59 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Can't wait for the next post ... should be interesting smile

Fabric

3,067 posts

62 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Getragdogleg said:
Laugh all you like, I did until I got my head around it.
I don't really think you do have your head around it though. The bottom of a moving wheel travels exactly the same speed as the top of the wheel.

Think about tracks on a tank. The tracks touching the ground appear to be static, whilst the top section of the same track appears to be moving much faster - of course this isn't actually the case, it's just a mindfk. It's one solid object, both sides rotate exactly the same speed.


Getragdogleg

3,725 posts

53 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
1point7bar said:
The contact patch must be moving at the same speed as the car, if it's in 100% traction.
The contact patch is part of the tyre.

Do I need to go on?
Nope.

go get a tyre or a bog roll inner or whatever, mark a line on it and roll it on a flat surface. tell me what happens to the line.
the line will hit the road and the contact patch will not be moving relative to the road while the top to the contact patch is moving in the direction of travel the area from contact patch to 9-o-clock is moving away from direction of travel.


ATTAK Z

2,094 posts

59 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Can I legally shoot pigeons that annoy me in my garden ?

1point7bar

1,091 posts

18 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
ATTAK Z said:
Can I legally shoot pigeons that annoy me in my garden ?
As vermin.

1point7bar

1,091 posts

18 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Getragdogleg said:
Nope.

go get a tyre or a bog roll inner or whatever, mark a line on it and roll it on a flat surface. tell me what happens to the line.
the line will hit the road and the contact patch will not be moving relative to the road while the top to the contact patch is moving in the direction of travel the area from contact patch to 9-o-clock is moving away from direction of travel.
The velocity of the contact patch is rotational not linear.

I didn't need a bog roll analogy, but thanks for the effort.

AdeTuono

3,826 posts

97 months

[news] 
Sunday 27th May 2012 quote quote all
Can I legally shoot PH'ers who can't grasp either physics or reality?
1 2 ... 41 42
44 45 ... 250 251
Reply to Topic