These pictures make my teeth itch
Discussion
Hooli said:
Skodasupercar said:
The window behind the wall or the mismatched height on the tiling?silverthorn2151 said:
Nope, I'll need ma clue to the obvious one first!
And as someone who refurbishes a lot of office bogs I am used to all sorts of things irritating people. Perhaps that has made me immune!
Look at the brown patterned tiles that run along the middle of the wall. The one on the RHS of that cubicle is upside downAnd as someone who refurbishes a lot of office bogs I am used to all sorts of things irritating people. Perhaps that has made me immune!
Skodasupercar said:
Whilst those things are an irritation, the window is a limitation of cramming toilet cubicles in.
No, the second issue is with the feature tiles still.
Well with the tiles the patterned bar changes height at the door on the right. The row in the middle of the screen isn't level all the way & has an upside down tile. How many more faults are there?No, the second issue is with the feature tiles still.
All sorts of workmanship issues yes but not the part which really gets me.
Perhaps it is too subtle on that photo.
here is a closer shot - have a look at how the repeating pattern at the top of the feature tile is asymmetrical - the repeat does not repeat consistently. Whoever designed that tile should be hung, drawn and quartered! (IMO)
edited to add, that photo shows up even more faults like the metal divider brackets at different heights too...
Perhaps it is too subtle on that photo.
here is a closer shot - have a look at how the repeating pattern at the top of the feature tile is asymmetrical - the repeat does not repeat consistently. Whoever designed that tile should be hung, drawn and quartered! (IMO)
edited to add, that photo shows up even more faults like the metal divider brackets at different heights too...
Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 21st April 15:33
Skodasupercar said:
All sorts of workmanship issues yes but not the part which really gets me.
Perhaps it is too subtle on that photo.
here is a closer shot - have a look at how the repeating pattern at the top of the feature tile is asymmetrical - the repeat does not repeat consistently. Whoever designed that tile should be hung, drawn and quartered! (IMO)
edited to add, that photo shows up even more faults like the metal divider brackets at different heights too...
Crap tiling and slightly off centre bog. All awfulPerhaps it is too subtle on that photo.
here is a closer shot - have a look at how the repeating pattern at the top of the feature tile is asymmetrical - the repeat does not repeat consistently. Whoever designed that tile should be hung, drawn and quartered! (IMO)
edited to add, that photo shows up even more faults like the metal divider brackets at different heights too...
Edited by Skodasupercar on Tuesday 21st April 15:33
jhfozzy said:
JumboBeef said:
You can imagine the sign writer's comments:"So let me get this straight, you want a sign saying keep left, with an arrow pointing to the right?"
Silver Smudger said:
jhfozzy said:
Nothing wrong there - The arrow does not mean 'keep right', rather that you are to proceed to the right (as if it was a one way street) and still keep to the left of the road as you do so.Watchman said:
What? Do you work in the public sector by any chance? It's terrible. A typical example of the confused thinking that goes on there.
Perfectly logical to me. Most people see a 1 way system sign and assume it's OK to drive in either lane. This sign presumably covers where approaching traffic has to turn right, but it's not a 1 way system at that point. Guessing, but perhaps the T to the left is the end of a 1 way system (flowing to the right)...Watchman said:
Silver Smudger said:
jhfozzy said:
Nothing wrong there - The arrow does not mean 'keep right', rather that you are to proceed to the right (as if it was a one way street) and still keep to the left of the road as you do so.Some Gump said:
Watchman said:
What? Do you work in the public sector by any chance? It's terrible. A typical example of the confused thinking that goes on there.
Perfectly logical to me. Most people see a 1 way system sign and assume it's OK to drive in either lane. This sign presumably covers where approaching traffic has to turn right, but it's not a 1 way system at that point. Guessing, but perhaps the T to the left is the end of a 1 way system (flowing to the right)...5potTurbo said:
Watchman said:
Silver Smudger said:
jhfozzy said:
Nothing wrong there - The arrow does not mean 'keep right', rather that you are to proceed to the right (as if it was a one way street) and still keep to the left of the road as you do so.Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff