These pictures make my teeth itch

These pictures make my teeth itch

Author
Discussion

ChemicalChaos

10,397 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Watchman said:
Needles on some magnetically-energised speedos wobble at low speeds. I wonder if this is acknowledgement of that, and so they only allow the needle to start moving once the car has passed the wobble range of speeds. Just a thought.
Yet everyone else seems to manage it just fine

Watchman

6,391 posts

246 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
Watchman said:
Needles on some magnetically-energised speedos wobble at low speeds. I wonder if this is acknowledgement of that, and so they only allow the needle to start moving once the car has passed the wobble range of speeds. Just a thought.
Yet everyone else seems to manage it just fine
So what? I wasn't trying to excuse it, just to explain why it might have been done.

I have seen wobbling speedo needles on a number of cars from the 1970s and 1980s (back then). Ford, Talbot and Leyland - cars my Dad had back then - some of those definitely had low-speed wobbling speedos.

I suspect the one in the picture is a cheap or old design, and this is their way of masking the problem.

motco

15,964 posts

247 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Mechanical speedos wobbled when oil from the gearbox crept up the cable causing it to drag. Bad ones would swing wildly over a range of tens of miles-per-hour. A properly functioning example worked perfectly from a standstill.

Matt UK

17,710 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Watchman said:
ChemicalChaos said:
Watchman said:
Needles on some magnetically-energised speedos wobble at low speeds. I wonder if this is acknowledgement of that, and so they only allow the needle to start moving once the car has passed the wobble range of speeds. Just a thought.
Yet everyone else seems to manage it just fine
So what? I wasn't trying to excuse it, just to explain why it might have been done.

I have seen wobbling speedo needles on a number of cars from the 1970s and 1980s (back then). Ford, Talbot and Leyland - cars my Dad had back then - some of those definitely had low-speed wobbling speedos.

I suspect the one in the picture is a cheap or old design, and this is their way of masking the problem.
From an Alfa 146 I believe.

Silver Smudger

3,299 posts

168 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all

PositronicRay

27,041 posts

184 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
Silver Smudger said:
Wheels not stored upright?

Neil H

15,323 posts

252 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
They're at different angles?

bertie

8,550 posts

285 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Silver Smudger said:
Wheels not stored upright?
Wheels and tyres stacked like that looks right to me?

http://www.tyreleader.co.uk/tyres-advices/how-to-p...


I think the irksome bit is supposed to be the pictures on the wall not being the same height, but the bikes bother me more!

Edited by bertie on Monday 9th March 17:10

Blown2CV

28,852 posts

204 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
Neil H said:
They're at different angles?
well the brackets are both horizontal, it's the top tube of the bikes that are slightly different to each other.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
Blib said:
Maybe the guy had a lisp
It's lithp, you 'tard...smile

grumbledoak

31,544 posts

234 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
well the brackets are both horizontal, it's the top tube of the bikes that are slightly different to each other.
No they aren't - look at the vertical parts of the brackets; they are not parallel!

Hand that workman another beer.

Silver Smudger

3,299 posts

168 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
bertie said:
Silver Smudger said:
I think the irksome bit is supposed to be the pictures on the wall not being the same height, but the bikes bother me more!
Both - The pictures at different heights (and his reason for this!) AND the wonky bikes!

HarryW

15,151 posts

270 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
One on the back of a ambulance today


037

1,317 posts

148 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
HarryW said:
One on the back of a ambulance today

Would have taken 30secs to google check that dimension.
Some people!

Mannginger

9,065 posts

258 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all





Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
037 said:
HarryW said:
One on the back of a ambulance today

Would have taken 30secs to google check that dimension.
Some people!
I guess they just rounded up to the nearest whole number, although 2.5 metres would have been perfectly fine.

Antony Moxey

8,085 posts

220 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Asterix said:
037 said:
HarryW said:
One on the back of a ambulance today

Would have taken 30secs to google check that dimension.
Some people!
I guess they just rounded up to the nearest whole number, although 2.5 metres would have been perfectly fine.
I was more looking at the fact that there's a full stop after 8ft with the 3m in brackets following on from that.

motco

15,964 posts

247 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Antony Moxey said:
Asterix said:
037 said:
HarryW said:
One on the back of a ambulance today

Would have taken 30secs to google check that dimension.
Some people!
I guess they just rounded up to the nearest whole number, although 2.5 metres would have been perfectly fine.
I was more looking at the fact that there's a full stop after 8ft with the 3m in brackets following on from that.
That and the fact that feet should be 'ft' and metres 'm'.

Yes I know many prefer 'meter' but that causes confusions with instruments with dials or digital displays.

Adenauer

18,581 posts

237 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Silver Smudger said:
bertie said:
Silver Smudger said:
I think the irksome bit is supposed to be the pictures on the wall not being the same height, but the bikes bother me more!
Both - The pictures at different heights (and his reason for this!) AND the wonky bikes!
Bite me biggrin

glenrobbo

35,282 posts

151 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Blib said:
Maybe the guy had a lisp
It's lithp, you 'tard...smile
No it ithn't, it'th lithp....

scratchchin I wonder if there ith a dentitht'th practith on the 2th floor?

I've got thith really bad tooth itch.

Edited by glenrobbo on Tuesday 10th March 10:44