Lottery is a bit crap
Discussion
I think the Euro should be limited to £10m, just up the number of winners when it's not won. After due diligence, me and the wife worked out how to spend £5m on things we'd like and things we'd like to experience and see. After that, the only way of reducing it is give it away to relatives and friends. If you win +£100m, you'll earn so much in interest that you'll never be able to spend it. Unless you buy an island, a Jumbo Jet, or a huge yacht. There is another bonus in a big win. The ability to tell all the aholes you encounter in life to fk off !!
robinessex said:
I think the Euro should be limited to £10m, just up the number of winners when it's not won. After due diligence, me and the wife worked out how to spend £5m on things we'd like and things we'd like to experience and see. After that, the only way of reducing it is give it away to relatives and friends. If you win +£100m, you'll earn so much in interest that you'll never be able to spend it. Unless you buy an island, a Jumbo Jet, or a huge yacht. There is another bonus in a big win. The ability to tell all the aholes you encounter in life to fk off !!
I don't think the point of winning £100m+ is that you spend it. That kind of money would basically safeguard your family for generations. You could change your loved ones lives overnight, medical treatment, houses, anything they ever need. Butter Face said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
JohneeBoy said:
I've gone in with 5 tickets too; 2 more than usual. 5 in 116m chance. Favourable odds, I'd say.
Yup, one in 23.5 million. I'd start making plans on how to live your new life if I were you. TwigtheWonderkid said:
Butter Face said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
JohneeBoy said:
I've gone in with 5 tickets too; 2 more than usual. 5 in 116m chance. Favourable odds, I'd say.
Yup, one in 23.5 million. I'd start making plans on how to live your new life if I were you. Imagine five friends buy 1 ticket each. If the first one has odds of 1:116m, what odds does the second one have?
robinessex said:
I think the Euro should be limited to £10m, just up the number of winners when it's not won. After due diligence, me and the wife worked out how to spend £5m on things we'd like and things we'd like to experience and see. After that, the only way of reducing it is give it away to relatives and friends. If you win +£100m, you'll earn so much in interest that you'll never be able to spend it. Unless you buy an island, a Jumbo Jet, or a huge yacht. There is another bonus in a big win. The ability to tell all the aholes you encounter in life to fk off !!
I could easily spend £128m although I probably wouldnt want to.£28m to family and friends? £20m to charity? Thats down to £80m already.
Company I work for builds houses which regularly top £15-20m. Add a flat in New York and Central London
Now at say £50m already....
Then the cars and holidays or 'living life' as it would then be known.....
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Butter Face said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
JohneeBoy said:
I've gone in with 5 tickets too; 2 more than usual. 5 in 116m chance. Favourable odds, I'd say.
Yup, one in 23.5 million. I'd start making plans on how to live your new life if I were you. Edit: One of my colleagues just said "Well, I think it's a mugs game anyway, there'll be loads of people buying tickets so your odds of winning are even lower"
I suppose the chances of you getting the jackpot all to yourself are marginally lower, but the odds of winning don't change.
Edited by Butter Face on Friday 17th October 13:32
I thought about the holiday home in London, New York etc and then thought "why bother?" if travelling for fun I'd just stay in good hotels even £1k a night is nothing and in the case of London I only live a hour on the train anyway so a driver and a Rolls would be a better idea. Ok you don't get the investment return, but would it matter with 100m in the bank.
Bullett said:
I thought about the holiday home in London, New York etc and then thought "why bother?" if travelling for fun I'd just stay in good hotels even £1k a night is nothing and in the case of London I only live a hour on the train anyway so a driver and a Rolls would be a better idea. Ok you don't get the investment return, but would it matter with 100m in the bank.
I agree,My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
Butter Face said:
Bullett said:
I thought about the holiday home in London, New York etc and then thought "why bother?" if travelling for fun I'd just stay in good hotels even £1k a night is nothing and in the case of London I only live a hour on the train anyway so a driver and a Rolls would be a better idea. Ok you don't get the investment return, but would it matter with 100m in the bank.
I agree,My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
I would just have a huge house in the UK, and an account with a high end travel company
Butter Face said:
I agree,
My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
I'd prob buy a nice place in the South of France, as i'd imagine spending a lot of time there, and would appreciate having locally registered vehicles and the ability to take my dogs without too much hassle.My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
Blib said:
You should all join the PH lottery. We don't even know what to do with all of our winnings.
I fell for that line before.
Although i will be right back in on it when it comes around again just to avoid the worry of you lot winning it without me.
Still saving for that Moon on a stick?
crashley said:
Butter Face said:
I agree,
My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
I'd prob buy a nice place in the South of France, as i'd imagine spending a lot of time there, and would appreciate having locally registered vehicles and the ability to take my dogs without too much hassle.My wife says 'wouldn't it be nice to have a place in etc etc' and my response is that she must be mad, you'd just have the best room in the best hotel anywhere you needed to be. It'd be easier and probably more cost efficient.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff