Match.com (Volume 6)
Discussion
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Blown2CV said:
V6Pushfit said:
Blown2CV said:
you sound like an absolute tool. Good luck finding a woman to put up with you!
Once again if you learned to read you would find I did You've got a real problem I may have referred to your type in the post above. Good luck being boring chap.
t idea? Not seeing the logic. Who has sad singlie and dating fails to share?
Blown2CV said:
you're describing me as boring because i said your cunning plan to get round a huge company's business model with a poorly thought through thing you've clearly never tried was a frankly bullst idea? Not seeing the logic.
This thread is about experiences and sharing. It's past tense with me I did it exactly as I said for nearly 2 years and am now well sorted. I've told you what I did. I didn't get round anything it's all there to do as I said, again, it's no different to other sites.t idea? Not seeing the logic. Simples.
You bought up stuff because you hadn't read it properly if at all.
If you don't like it that's up to you. I suggest you get writing a witty and humorous profile.... oh wait.
V6Pushfit said:
This thread is about experiences and sharing. It's past tense with me I did it exactly as I said for nearly 2 years and am now well sorted. I've told you what I did. I didn't get round anything it's all there to do as I said, again, it's no different to other sites.
Simples.
You bought up stuff because you hadn't read it properly if at all.
If you don't like it that's up to you. I suggest you get writing a witty and humorous profile.... oh wait.
Well, let's just leave it that I think you're talking horsesSimples.
You bought up stuff because you hadn't read it properly if at all.
If you don't like it that's up to you. I suggest you get writing a witty and humorous profile.... oh wait.
t. I'm married mate, no fking profile required. Leave it now because you're boring everyone. Steve vRS said:
Trabi601 said:
The algorithms to trap email on dating sites are pretty robust. I've tried to circumvent them in the past, but they seemed to trap just about
I suppose you could code up your email address or phone number and hope your prospective date works at Bletchley Park. V6Pushfit said:
Certainly last year you could do a profile and send messages but not receive any, so if you send your email you then do comms outside of the site. The free weekends too - explain you've only got 2 days so they need to do via email.
I've said before I never paid for POF or Match and did very well on it for a long time!
Great advice.I've said before I never paid for POF or Match and did very well on it for a long time!
Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
blindswelledrat said:
Great advice.
Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
Its not done like that. If it was it wouldn't work so well. Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
blindswelledrat said:
V6Pushfit said:
Certainly last year you could do a profile and send messages but not receive any, so if you send your email you then do comms outside of the site. The free weekends too - explain you've only got 2 days so they need to do via email.
I've said before I never paid for POF or Match and did very well on it for a long time!
Great advice.I've said before I never paid for POF or Match and did very well on it for a long time!
Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
Its been said time & again on here that women on dating sites, especially those with a bit of the fittie gene, are inundated with messages every day. Thats hundreds, not a few, hundreds especially when they are new to a site. A friend of mine that I met on Match nearly 10 years ago am still friends with was getting 250+ messages a day on there. So when some lady is getting that many a day & a lot are single word hello or a c0ck pic or something equally banal whatever you say has to stand out.
Weird how ppl expect a reply to a simple message if that person is receiving so many a day & has a normal life to lead. If someone is jumping on Match for instance for a cpl days free time it says to the girl at the other end he's too tight arsed to bother so why should she? She will have hundreds of potentials to choose from whereas you will have a hell of a lot less.
Yes it takes no time at all to say thanks no than ks to a message from a guy but who wants to do that a hundred times a day (allowing for 100 msgs being polite). You're expecting the unrealistic.
V6Pushfit said:
blindswelledrat said:
Great advice.
Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
Its not done like that. If it was it wouldn't work so well. Send these women a message that basically reads "Hey, love, I am so tight and poor that I am going to try and have sex but you aren't worth the modest investment of a site subscription. What d'yer reckon?"
The type of women that are excited by a bloke who advertises the fact he is too tight to buy a subscription for a dating site are probably unlikely to be the type of women I would regards as a success if I pulled. Each to their own I suppose.
If I was ever in the position I had to use a dating site* I might use your method to weed out the women I definitely won't date
- of course this will never happen - I am handsome, witty and intelligent.
blindswelledrat said:
Well, depends on how you define 'works so well'
The type of women that are excited by a bloke who advertises the fact he is too tight to buy a subscription for a dating site are probably unlikely to be the type of women I would regards as a success if I pulled. Each to their own I suppose.
If I was ever in the position I had to use a dating site* I might use your method to weed out the women I definitely won't date
As I've said it worked well for me, I had some absolutely cracking times, and ended up with a dream. The type of women that are excited by a bloke who advertises the fact he is too tight to buy a subscription for a dating site are probably unlikely to be the type of women I would regards as a success if I pulled. Each to their own I suppose.
If I was ever in the position I had to use a dating site* I might use your method to weed out the women I definitely won't date
- of course this will never happen - I am handsome, witty and intelligent.
The feedback almost exclusively from dates was that there are too many numpties on the sites and the girls have to weed them out. I've looked at blokes on Match from some of the girls tablets (a horrific thing looking at blokes profiles) and they are all Jason Statham wannabees, mostly shaven heads and tats, all look the same and some think that hobbies including 'skydiving/fast cars/iron man' etc is impressive for a relationship - ITS NOT as it makes then look like bulls
t dreamers. Anyway each to their own.
V6Pushfit said:
As I've said it worked well for me, I had some absolutely cracking times, and ended up with a dream.
The feedback almost exclusively from dates was that there are too many numpties on the sites and the girls have to weed them out. I've looked at blokes on Match from some of the girls tablets (a horrific thing looking at blokes profiles) and they are all Jason Statham wannabees, mostly shaven heads and tats, all look the same and some think that hobbies including 'skydiving/fast cars/iron man' etc is impressive for a relationship - ITS NOT as it makes then look like bullst dreamers.
Anyway each to their own.
Says the man with the login 'V6PUSHFIT' - which to me as an intelligent woman reads 'I like fast cars and pump hard at the gym' The feedback almost exclusively from dates was that there are too many numpties on the sites and the girls have to weed them out. I've looked at blokes on Match from some of the girls tablets (a horrific thing looking at blokes profiles) and they are all Jason Statham wannabees, mostly shaven heads and tats, all look the same and some think that hobbies including 'skydiving/fast cars/iron man' etc is impressive for a relationship - ITS NOT as it makes then look like bulls
t dreamers. Anyway each to their own.
f
king hilarious. I'm sure your lady is a dream to you. Why you're still arguing your point on a thread aimed at singles I can't fathom. Go and have fun with her. Enjoy your life and stop worrying about how we are or aren't pulling. PS Your weirdo email approach would have me blocking you. It's verges on jobless stalker - reading between the lines in a Bletchley Park dried up spinster style.
Gretchen said:
Says the man with the login 'V6PUSHFIT' - which to me as an intelligent woman reads 'I like fast cars and pump hard at the gym
WTF?...says the bloke with a username of a Brazilian female singer
Jees you have a problem and it's in your head Pal. I'm not proving anything I'm telling you my view as how it worked. You come over as one of the boring feckless types they all gave up with.
Jason Statham wannabe shaven head?
Edited by V6Pushfit on Monday 3rd October 17:21
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff