Match.com (Volume 6)

Match.com (Volume 6)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Don1

15,952 posts

209 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Cry me a river... waitasecond... wink

vtecyo

2,122 posts

130 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Matt UK said:
My mate who has been on this scene for a couple of years now shared the view that if you are seeing a few, you are merely dating / getting out and about meeting new people.
If you start having sex with one of them regularly whilst seeing others, you'll be perceived as a 'player' - which you may or may not want to be.
His personal rule is once you've had sex 3 times in a short space of time, he doesn't date others.
But I guess it's all personal. Another mate shags anything that moves and has the mindset that until he's married he's not being unfaithful to anyone.
And we've all got the mate who gets a mere fluttering of eyelashes and a phone number, and decides to fall hopelessly in love thinking it's the start of beautiful long term relationship hehe
Good viewpoint. I like it.

And yes, I've recently lost a mate to the last point there after he split from his wife and gave it the whole going travelling / new man thing.

Trabi601

4,865 posts

96 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'd get that checked out... you just never know if it's bad conjunctivitis, rather than viral.

Ari

19,352 posts

216 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
johnwilliams77 said:
CaptainSlow said:
59, not 39
not looking for hookups... dresses like a ho in a bra, obviously on a webcam.
She's got a brain though.

oh yes a women with a brain

Arguably not a very good one...

if you play with women you eill rein things gor the good guys i am a good person u will loose out out l

Condi

17,262 posts

172 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Its always reassuring to go into the clinic and tell them what you've got. Saves a lot of time.


The problem comes when you've been through all the topical creams and over the counter remedies and you still down know what is wrong!

Condi

17,262 posts

172 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Right, advice from the floor please... I think I know the answer...

Met a girl about 3 months ago. Pretty, intelligent, very easy to get along with, very similar interests to me, good fun to be around... in all honesty if I had to write what I was after she'd tick almost every box. We spend time together when we can, once or twice a week maybe. Even if its only for a few hours we try when we can.

BUT

Its not 'exciting'. Not in the bedroom exciting, but just generally. Its nice when she comes round, but I dont really look forward to it, there are never any butterflys. Its just 'meh' and I really dont know why.


Suspect its because Ive not had to put any work at all into her, shes keen and therefore its very easy for me. Shes by far the most compatible person Ive ever dated, and yet for some reason it appears Im out to self-destruct this relationship because it doesnt mean anything. Yet the totally bonkers, totally unsuitable one I was willing to spend 2 years chasing, and went through some massive highs and lows when we did go out. What the fk?!

Soooo.... guess the question is should this be put to bed now, or will the excitement come with time?

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Condi said:
Right, advice from the floor please... I think I know the answer...

Met a girl about 3 months ago. Pretty, intelligent, very easy to get along with, very similar interests to me, good fun to be around... in all honesty if I had to write what I was after she'd tick almost every box. We spend time together when we can, once or twice a week maybe. Even if its only for a few hours we try when we can.

BUT

Its not 'exciting'. Not in the bedroom exciting, but just generally. Its nice when she comes round, but I dont really look forward to it, there are never any butterflys. Its just 'meh' and I really dont know why.


Suspect its because Ive not had to put any work at all into her, shes keen and therefore its very easy for me. Shes by far the most compatible person Ive ever dated, and yet for some reason it appears Im out to self-destruct this relationship because it doesnt mean anything. Yet the totally bonkers, totally unsuitable one I was willing to spend 2 years chasing, and went through some massive highs and lows when we did go out. What the fk?!

Soooo.... guess the question is should this be put to bed now, or will the excitement come with time?
Seems you don't fancy her, but you haven't noticed.

mjb1

2,556 posts

160 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
I'm in a similar situation too. Started off as just friends (that's all I wanted at the time), but became clear she wanted more. I told her I didn't want a relationship, and things progressed to a 'with benefits' scenario. That's been going on for a couple of months and she dearly wants it to become a proper committed relationship (I'm not a player, we've both stayed exclusive to each other, despite the somewhat 'casual' arrangement).

She's a nice girl personality wise, but I see her more as a friend than someone I'm crazy about. The physical attraction (for me) is pretty minimal, if any at all, if I'm honest with myself about it. She's very much on the large side of large (must be dress size 20+). I'm ok about that in the short term, but I can help but think that she's going to be in for a world of health problems in 10-15 years time.

We've both got kids from previous relationships, which isn't an issue in itself, but she wants a fully committed relationship with us all part of a family unit. I've totally played it down all the way through, and that has meant her blowing hot and cold. One day she tells me she doesn't want us to carry on seeing each other, and I've never protested about us cooling things. Then a couple of days later she's inviting me round for an evening of 'with benefits'.

I think part of my problem is that I've always followed the 'beggars can't be choosers' approach to women - I'm pretty ugly and women that fancy me are a rarity. So I've just gone along with every offer I've ever had. The idea of actually turning a women down makes me feel bad.

I realise that I should probably call the whole thing off, as I'm potentially leading her on (even though I've always been clear that I don't want a relationship). But on the other hand, maybe it could develop into something really good. I could be single for the rest of my life if no one else comes along, never mind someone better.

So, is physical attraction essential for a successful relationship? I'd always thought that it was, but now I'm asking myself if maybe it can work without.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
mjb1 said:
The physical attraction (for me) is pretty minimal, if any at all, if I'm honest with myself about it.

[...]

But on the other hand, maybe it could develop into something really good.
nono Nope. Not a chance. You're kidding yourself. Stop putting yourself down. If you're not into her then bin her off and move on. Gym fixes 'ugly' problems if you work at it enough hehe.

Matt UK

17,739 posts

201 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
mjb1 said:
I'm in a similar situation too. Started off as just friends (that's all I wanted at the time), but became clear she wanted more. I told her I didn't want a relationship, and things progressed to a 'with benefits' scenario. That's been going on for a couple of months and she dearly wants it to become a proper committed relationship (I'm not a player, we've both stayed exclusive to each other, despite the somewhat 'casual' arrangement).

She's a nice girl personality wise, but I see her more as a friend than someone I'm crazy about. The physical attraction (for me) is pretty minimal, if any at all, if I'm honest with myself about it. She's very much on the large side of large (must be dress size 20+). I'm ok about that in the short term, but I can help but think that she's going to be in for a world of health problems in 10-15 years time.

We've both got kids from previous relationships, which isn't an issue in itself, but she wants a fully committed relationship with us all part of a family unit. I've totally played it down all the way through, and that has meant her blowing hot and cold. One day she tells me she doesn't want us to carry on seeing each other, and I've never protested about us cooling things. Then a couple of days later she's inviting me round for an evening of 'with benefits'.

I think part of my problem is that I've always followed the 'beggars can't be choosers' approach to women - I'm pretty ugly and women that fancy me are a rarity. So I've just gone along with every offer I've ever had. The idea of actually turning a women down makes me feel bad.

I realise that I should probably call the whole thing off, as I'm potentially leading her on (even though I've always been clear that I don't want a relationship). But on the other hand, maybe it could develop into something really good. I could be single for the rest of my life if no one else comes along, never mind someone better.

So, is physical attraction essential for a successful relationship? I'd always thought that it was, but now I'm asking myself if maybe it can work without.
It really depends on where you personal benchmark is in terms of being single / alone.

At one end you have those who just need to be in a relationship and can't go a day without - these types will hop on any passing ship with the lights on. Best case is they may find the perfect partner because they kissed a lot of frogs on their journey, but they never stopped trying.
Worst case is they lead a trail of broken promises or destruction behind them as they hop from ship to ship, or they end up in destructive / abusive relationships that they figure are better than nothing.

At the other you have those who are unicorn hunting and are simply not prepared to entertain any relationship unless the partner is perfect in every way. Best case they hold out for the unicorn, find one and live happily ever after - the wait was justified.
Worst case is they end up being on their own for so long that one day they're sucking on their final Werthers Original, having never enjoyed the benefits and closeness of a long term relationship, wondering if maybe it would have been better to have cast the net a bit wider.

There's no right or wrong, we're all wired in complex ways.
Every partner you'll ever meet or relationship you enter into is a compromise to a some extent or another vs your ideals. Only you can decide that.

But in all situations, just remeber that if she really is hotter than a 9 and less crazy than a 4 - she's a dude hehe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKWmFWRVLlU

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
mjb1 said:
I realise that I should probably call the whole thing off, as I'm potentially leading her on (even though I've always been clear that I don't want a relationship). But on the other hand, maybe it could develop into something really good. I could be single for the rest of my life if no one else comes along, never mind someone better.

So, is physical attraction essential for a successful relationship? I'd always thought that it was, but now I'm asking myself if maybe it can work without.
It sounds in your situation that you'd be better off calling it off.

You definiately need some sort of physical attraction to maintain a healthy relationship. Sex isn't everything but it is quite a major part of what makes a relationship work.

Regarding the guy who doesn't have butteryflys, you tell me if you want it to work. Do you care about her? do you love her?

I didn't really have to "work" to get my mrs, we just clicked, we have been together nearly 6 months, living together for 1.5 months.
I still hate it when she goes and get excited every time she walks in the door. But that's just me, doesn't mean everyone should feel that way..
But I think you should have some sort of fuzzy feeling? Isn't that love?

BrabusMog

20,184 posts

187 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
4.5 months together and you move in?!! Crikey!

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
BrabusMog said:
4.5 months together and you move in?!! Crikey!
What's wrong with that?

BrabusMog

20,184 posts

187 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
Just seems a bit sudden to me but if it works for you that's great.

Matt UK

17,739 posts

201 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
BrabusMog said:
4.5 months together and you move in?!! Crikey!
What's wrong with that?
Well it's quite a short space of time. Unless you'd known each other as friends beforehand.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all


When we started going out we almost immediately started spending most of our free time together and every night together regardless. We already went shopping for food together as we'd always eat dinner together.

Saves the whole "I'm back from my friends now, you can come round." crap.

My friend moved in with his Mrs after less than 3 months. I guess when you know, you know, it's working, so if people think it's soon then they can feel free.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
BrabusMog said:
4.5 months together and you move in?!! Crikey!
What's wrong with that?
It's considered to be a very fast transitional period from having nice cuddles and just getting your dick wet a few times a week with no ties to full on seriousness where you quickly have to deal with and learn to accept all the OPs annoying and disgusting bad habits. Often causes the relationship to quickly lose its shine for one or both parties and it can be over before it's even started. Moving in together is when you discover what the OP is really like in their natural habitat.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
All that jazz said:
It's considered to be a very fast transitional period from having nice cuddles and just getting your dick wet a few times a week with no ties to full on seriousness where you quickly have to deal with and learn to accept all the OPs annoying and disgusting bad habits. Often causes the relationship to quickly lose its shine for one or both parties and it can be over before it's even started. Moving in together is when you discover what the OP is really like in their natural habitat.
I guess that may be true, as I mentioned above, we spent so much time together, we basically lived together anyway.
I didn't know there was a time scale.

Her sister and her BF moved in after 3 months also. They are now 1 kid and 3 years down the line. As I also said my friend and his Mrs have been together nearly 4 years now. They also moved in after 3 months.

If you know, you know.



All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
I didn't know there was a time scale.
There isn't, but as a general rule the shorter the period the higher the likelihood is of it ending in tears for the reasons mentioned. I can guarantee there will have been a girl-to-girl with her mates already about your annoying and disgusting bad habits. Her level of "into you-ness" is the deciding factor in whether that becomes a problem or not, and vv. smile

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
All that jazz said:
I can guarantee there will have been a girl-to-girl with her mates already about your annoying and disgusting bad habits.
But what if I can guarantee you that there hasn't...

I can now appreciate how annoying it can be being on the "other side" of the fence, despite the unwanted/unneeded advice.

The fact she choses to not go on weekends away with her mates because she doesn't want to leave me says a lot. She is free to go, I don't stop her.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED