Are there more people working than not working in the UK?

Are there more people working than not working in the UK?

Author
Discussion

dibbers006

Original Poster:

12,185 posts

218 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 16 December 2023 at 10:25

Jabbah

1,331 posts

154 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Current number of people in work is just over 30 million. Population of UK is just over 64 million. So yeah about 53% of all people living in the UK are not working.

P-Jay

10,563 posts

191 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
There are about 62 million people in the UK, 12 million are under 16, 14 million are retired leaving 36 million of 'working age' 3 million of them are unemployed and actively seeking work leaving you with 33 million - so not far off 50% or so.

I'd bet if you factor in housewives/husbands (I know they work, but for the purpose of this they don't count as they don't have a contracted job as such) people who are disabled, people of independent means and the homeless the balance would dip just below 50%

As for how many people you see about between 9-5 you have to consider of course not everyone works 'office hours' and how many people work part-time these days (through choice or not) and that most people in the UK get 6 weeks ish leave to take every year - that's over 10% of your year you can be off-work if you want.



Edited by P-Jay on Friday 12th September 16:59

Eric Mc

121,941 posts

265 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
EVERYBODY should work - irrespective of age. I mean, I haven't had a child up my chimney (NOT a euphemism) for years.

ghamer

602 posts

155 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
EVERYBODY should work - irrespective of age. I mean, I haven't had a child up my chimney (NOT a euphemism) for years.
Proper LOL

LucreLout

908 posts

118 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
From the 33M, you need to remove the 6 or 7M public sector workers, the minimum wage who get topped up with benefits etc and pretty soon you see the problem.
Less than 25% of the country are paying their own way, and less than 10% of it are paying for everyone else. The number in private sector employment needs to be increased while reducing the cost of the others, or the books will never balance.

Blown2CV

28,786 posts

203 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
i heard a shocking soundbite discussed as part of scottish independence that 60% of Scots are on benefits. Completely misleading as precisely the same proportion of the rest of the UK is too, but still it's a fking ridiculous number. Doesn't quite relate to the unemployment rates, and clearly 'benefits' covers a number of different aspects.

Eric Mc

121,941 posts

265 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Many, many people "on benefits" are also receiving a wage - legally. "On benefits" does not mean a person is not actually working and receiving earned income.

Also, does the "60%" figure include people receiving state pension? Are you implying that those who have worked hard all their lives are NOT entitled to state support in old age? After all, they most probably will only receive a fraction of what they contributed in their working lives.

bingybongy

3,872 posts

146 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
So 6 or 7 million public employees don't count as being at work?
I'll let my wife know the 10 hours a day she spends in the hospital aren't work.

lamboman100

1,445 posts

121 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Nine in 10 Scottish households receive more from the UK state than they pay in tax.

Roughly 1 in 10 are net contributors.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
As for how many people you see about between 9-5 you have to consider of course not everyone works 'office hours' and how many people work part-time these days (through choice or not) and that most people in the UK get 6 weeks ish leave to take every year - that's over 10% of your year you can be off-work if you want.
Good points there.

Like the OP, when I have a rare day off and walk around a city centre during 'office hours' I am always amazed at the hoards of people and I always wonder why they aren't all at work!

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
i heard a shocking soundbite discussed as part of scottish independence that 60% of Scots are on benefits. Completely misleading as precisely the same proportion of the rest of the UK is too, but still it's a fking ridiculous number. Doesn't quite relate to the unemployment rates, and clearly 'benefits' covers a number of different aspects.
Is it a ridiculous number? Presumably everyone with a child under 16 counts, to start with.

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Many, many people "on benefits" are also receiving a wage - legally. "On benefits" does not mean a person is not actually working and receiving earned income.

Also, does the "60%" figure include people receiving state pension? Are you implying that those who have worked hard all their lives are NOT entitled to state support in old age? After all, they most probably will only receive a fraction of what they contributed in their working lives.
does the 'on benefits' figure include people who recieve Child benefit ( so basically anyone witha child under school leaving age apart from the top few percent), working families tax credits - especially those with several offspring , plus of course the state pensions and people who get DLA/PIP regardless of their work status (as DLA/PIP is none means tested - if you are ill / disabled enough you get it - i don;t know if the likes of Frank Williams and Stephen Hawking do claim but they'd be eligible to get it ).


I see other posters have perpetuated the fallacy that public sector workers are taking from the economy - i know it;s immature and pathetic but i wonder if these people would have oteh same veiw of the public sectyor fater being involved in an RTC which caused them serious , life changing , injuries and their survivial depended on at least 3 of the emergency services, their recovery was result of the world class trauam and specialist rehab services the NHS has - far far better than the services the average US American has access to ...

DervVW

2,223 posts

139 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
bingybongy said:
So 6 or 7 million public employees don't count as being at work?
I'll let my wife know the 10 hours a day she spends in the hospital aren't work.
I'm pretty sure, they were not devaluing the work your wife does. Just that from a purely income making prospect for the UK income, it does not generate wealth.

Cemesis

771 posts

162 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
bingybongy said:
So 6 or 7 million public employees don't count as being at work?
I'll let my wife know the 10 hours a day she spends in the hospital aren't work.
Of the 30 million who work, only about half of those are full time. Of the 15 million in full time employment, half of those are public sector (like your wife). The problem with public sector jobs is that they are paid from the tax pot, then they themselves pay tax and the money gets churned around. Full time private sector jobs make up about 10% of the UK population, which is why we are in so much debt.

Studio117

4,250 posts

191 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Cemesis said:
bingybongy said:
So 6 or 7 million public employees don't count as being at work?
I'll let my wife know the 10 hours a day she spends in the hospital aren't work.
Of the 30 million who work, only about half of those are full time. Of the 15 million in full time employment, half of those are public sector (like your wife). The problem with public sector jobs is that they are paid from the tax pot, then they themselves pay tax and the money gets churned around. Full time private sector jobs make up about 10% of the UK population, which is why we are in so much debt.
The problem with most public sector jobs is the lack of consequences and culpability for major cockups. Missed a deadline? Oh well...

Eric Mc

121,941 posts

265 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Studio117 said:
The problem with most public sector jobs is the lack of consequences and culpability for major cockups. Missed a deadline? Oh well...
Tell that to the squaddie in Afghanistan who misses a target.

Studio117

4,250 posts

191 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I meant office dossers and the like.

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
If a democracy gets to the point where more voters rely on the redistribution of wealth than the creation of it, it's going to be in trouble.

basherX

2,471 posts

161 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Studio117 said:
The problem with most public sector jobs is the lack of consequences and culpability for major cockups. Missed a deadline? Oh well...
Tell that to the squaddie in Afghanistan who misses a target.
I used to take great delight in trotting out the age old "I pay your wages" line to my twin brother, an A&E consultant. Nothing more certain to set the old bd off. Great fun. Then it dawned on me that when my luck on the roads or with the DIY finally runs out I won't be paying anything to anyone without someone like him to pick up the pieces. So whilst some of those in public service might have little merit I have to admit that many do.

Not that I'd admit such a thing to my brother, obviously.