a bit council

[jamiebae]

Johnnytheboy said:

Remark earlier about aftermarket DRLs. I saw a car today (in the dark) with sidelights, foglights and aftermarket DRLs on.

Then I noticed it was a Rover 25.

Which leads me to:

Any <20 year old Rover. Council as you like.

Loads of Swiss cars have aftermarket DRLs now, but for an actual reason. At the start of 2014 the government passed a law saying all cars must have DRLs or dipped beam headlights on AT ALL TIMES. Even when it's 35 degrees and bright sunshine in mid summer.

If you have something like a mid 2000s Ford that means you have to remember to turn the headlights on every time you get in the car, if you forget the fine is about £70, so fitting chav DRLs makes sense in this instance. Thankfully my car has OEM DRLs so I don't have to look council.

Maybe all these cars in the UK are owned by keen skiers who spend a lot of time in Switzerland?

[Cobnapint]

Johnnytheboy said:

Then I noticed it was a Rover 25.

Any <20 year old Rover. Council as you like.

And they never, and I mean NEVER, have a full set of working brake or side lights.

[Johnnytheboy]

Cobnapint said:

And they never, and I mean NEVER, have a full set of working brake or side lights.

No, failed brake lights is Vauxhalls.

I followed an Astra for a long way last week, very slowly.

It only had 2/3 brake lights.

On the plus side, they were on permanently.

[kowalski655]

55palfers said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931590/As...

Does this encapsulate the thread I wonder?

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

[Cobnapint]

kowalski655 said:

Look at his old house:
giant satalitte dish:check
rubbish in garden:check
england flag:check
bin with stupid stickers:check
crap curtains:check
ALL mentioned on here already

LOL - Shameless.

Why the fk would you have a satellite dish on a long aerial pole, what, to get it an extra few feet closer to the orbiting satellite for a better picture. WTF.

It's as if these people go out of their way to make their home, sorry, hovel, blend in with everybody else's. It's all about fitting in.

God forbid if Jayden should go round Wayne's house and find it clean and tidy. He'd get beaten up on the spot.

[Bullett]

Did you see the state of the Kitchen?

[Liquid Knight]

Cobnapint said:

kowalski655 said:

Look at his old house:
giant satalitte dish:check
rubbish in garden:check
england flag:check
bin with stupid stickers:check
crap curtains:check
ALL mentioned on here already

LOL - Shameless.

Why the fk would you have a satellite dish on a long aerial pole, what, to get it an extra few feet closer to the orbiting satellite for a better picture. WTF.

It's as if these people go out of their way to make their home, sorry, hovel, blend in with everybody else's. It's all about fitting in.

God forbid if Jayden should go round Wayne's house and find it clean and tidy. He'd get beaten up on the spot.

Anyone else thinking...

"I'd take that window out and make it a double garage".

...?

[e21Mark]

Triumph Man said:

e21Mark said:

OpulentBob said:

soad said:

lord trumpton said:

Mondeo in dark metallic green, cracked rear bumper fixed with gaffer tape - parked on pavement outside the council house.

Yes, but can't be too many left now (unless you meant later shape model).

I wonder if they'll ever hold the same wow factor as a jellymould Sierra does now?

I think an E36 BMW is de rigueur for the full council. A maroon 318i with a handful of 'upgrades', such as M3 mirrors and 'racing exhaust'.

And then sold on ebay as "318i M3 replica not 325i 328i ////M" or similar.

Or weld the diff and go driftin' innit.

[irocfan]

kowalski655 said:

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

I suspect what would make life easier for this person would be to close her fkin' legs!

[anonymous-user]

irocfan said:

kowalski655 said:

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

I suspect what would make life easier for this person would be to close her fkin' legs!

That's some high-end Council right there!

Stick her in leggings and I'd be having sweaty thoughts if I followed her around Iceland.

ETA check out the kids names! Latoya

Edited by OpulentBob on Friday 30th January 10:48

[e21Mark]

OpulentBob said:

irocfan said:

kowalski655 said:

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

I suspect what would make life easier for this person would be to close her fkin' legs!

That's some high-end Council right there!

Stick her in leggings and I'd be having sweaty thoughts if I followed her around Iceland.

ETA check out the kids names! Latoya

Edited by OpulentBob on Friday 30th January 10:48

Madison is another proper classy name.

[HRL]

On the one hand the article says she's never worked, then later on she says she'll have to go back to work. Make your fecking mind up!

Is she Catholic?

[Hainey]

irocfan said:

kowalski655 said:

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

I suspect what would make life easier for this person would be to close her fkin' legs!

She needs every penny of that £26k benefits, have you seen the price of fried chicken these days?

[tobster]

Maybe not treating her fanny like a clown car might have been in order ?

[RobinBanks]

Why would you call your children those names? Mikayla and Alisha (Alicia is fine, but not a made up spelling of it).

And being forced to work to take care of her family - isn't that a fairly average and normal reason to work?

[Johnnytheboy]

RobinBanks said:

And being forced to work to take care of her family - isn't that a fairly average and normal reason to work?

No. The rest of us should work to take care of her family.

It's only fair.

[johnxjsc1985]

They are not going to have their benefits stopped and they are not going to be prevented from having more children. There is no stopping them and we are going to have to pay and pay and pay again

[Munter]

johnxjsc1985 said:

They are not going to have their benefits stopped and they are not going to be prevented from having more children. There is no stopping them and we are going to have to pay and pay and pay again

I'd like the rule to be:
If you give birth any time after 12 months from when you started collecting benefits due to unemployment. Then that child is not taken into account for any benefits.

[anonymous-user]

kowalski655 said:

This certainly does!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931225/Mo...

The Daily Mail said:

Her relationship with her partner and father of all of her offspring ended in 2013 because he could not handle having so many children.

Leaving aside the obvious - that it cannot have been a surprise to him that he would have a lot of children were he to keeping getting her up the stick - why isn't he stumping up some money for these kids?

[johnxjsc1985]

Munter said:

I'd like the rule to be:
If you give birth any time after 12 months from when you started collecting benefits due to unemployment. Then that child is not taken into account for any benefits.

2 Children only for new claimants if you want more get afkin JOB.
what really boils my piss is when they "DEMAND" a bigger house and they usually get one