Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

JustinF

6,795 posts

204 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
Rostfritt said:
FlyingMeeces said:
This is gonna sound like a dig, and it ain't.

But think about all of the millions of people in small, cramped, cheap housing. Add in everyone in Victorian terraces and that's the majority of the country, I suspect. Pretty much none of them have a second loo.

I reckon it evens out to something like 2:1.
I would guess closer to 1:1. Maybe 2-3:1 in houses, although I live alone and have one, my Dad and Granddad live together and have two. When you add up all the others, there are those in businesses, where to be fair I live in a large office with barely above the minimum required, probably a higher proportion in smaller businesses, then shops, restaurants, train stations, trains, planes public loos etc. There are so many other places you might find one that it might bring it back to 1:1.
Who gives a st?

Or was that that original question? wink

Issi

1,782 posts

151 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
Why are always people queuing in Pandora? How many sparkly beads can one person need?

djc206

12,373 posts

126 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
SilverSpur said:
FiF said:
Vipers said:
SilverSpur said:
Vipers said:
Apart from being fekking annoying, why do immigration stamp passports on random pages, why not start at the top of page one, then then put the next stamp underneath that and so on.




smile
If you had to stamp 5000 passports a day, finding the first open space on the first available page is going to take much more time and effort than just randomly opening any page and any spot and hitting it with the stamp.
Sounds reasonable, now you mention it.




smile
I'd suggest a slightly different logic. Let's assume for a moment that the act of admitting the person is a decision process whether to admit or not, as opposed to a simple need to put a stamp in the passport.

You check that the document applies to the person, the reason for the visit, and a flick through the passport shows that they have no adverse observations noted, and there is no previous evidence of a visit to your borders. You decide to admit them.

If so, turn to a clean page and bang down the stamp. Next time they visit, it would make sense to place the next stamp to the first one, as opposed to just spraying them wherever and a handy record all in one place.

But then that's logical for you.
Clearly that is logical, but also the exact opposite of the reality. They check the personal details page, but never seen them flick through all the other pages looking at other stamps and visas. But I guess it depends what country/regime you are visiting? I'd guess they'd be much more interested in North Korea or Cuba than in Spain for example....
My UAE stamps from the past 4 years are all on a double page and the next page. Very considerate of them as every other country seems to vandalise a clean double page that could be used for a visa.

br d

8,403 posts

227 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
If you get fitted with one of those 7 day heart monitors do you reckon they could tell if you had a crafty wk?

popeyewhite

19,974 posts

121 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
br d said:
If you get fitted with one of those 7 day heart monitors do you reckon they could tell if you had a crafty wk?
If you mean a boredom wk...probably not. A wk involving reams of porn, sextoys and recreational drugs? Almost definitely. But you could always say you walked up the stairs a few times to see if your 'creaky' knee was any better.

FlyingMeeces

9,932 posts

212 months

Saturday 9th July 2016
quotequote all
Watching the football/cycling/tennis would for a fan cause a similar increase in heart rate I expect, so nah, they won't know. But they'd be stupid not to assume it of any adult, anyhow.

Vipers

32,900 posts

229 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
Two questions. Just posted a letter to Hong Kong, and the trouble and strife gave me a "By Air Mail" sticker for it, looking at I am wondering why it only says "By Air Mail", and "par avion"

Why only in English and French, why not any other language.

Second question, we buy a stamp or pay the going rate to post letters/parcels overseas, how do the airlines recoup the cost from the Post Office etc for the carriage of letters/parcels on their aircraft?




smile

Vipers

32,900 posts

229 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
AVV EM said:
Ayahuasca said:
There are two-legged animals and four-legged animals, eight, six, 100 and 1,000 legged animals.

Why have no three-legged animals evolved?
because they're fking useless laugh
Don't forget the centipede with 999 legs, he had one wooden leg biggrin




smile

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

220 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
br d said:
If you get fitted with one of those 7 day heart monitors do you reckon they could tell if you had a crafty wk?
I had one of those - and you have to keep an accurate diary of 'events' so that the cardiologist can interpret the results.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

220 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
There are two-legged animals and four-legged animals, eight, six, 100 and 1,000 legged animals.

Why have no three-legged animals evolved?
There are three and five limbed animals (the tail counts as a limb).

ashleyman

6,987 posts

100 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
Do people in wheelchairs that don't have control of their legs, have control of their bowels?

When I say don't have control, I mean the people that have never used their legs so they're small due to not being used.

So awkward but hopefully it doesn't sound like I'm being rude. frown

FlyingMeeces

9,932 posts

212 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
ashleyman said:
Do people in wheelchairs that don't have control of their legs, have control of their bowels?

When I say don't have control, I mean the people that have never used their legs so they're small due to not being used.

So awkward but hopefully it doesn't sound like I'm being rude. frown
Not rude at all, and I know what you mean.

You have a bit of a logic gap though.

There are loads of conditions that might make you be a wheelchair user from childhood!

What you are thinking of, I suspect, is people who were born with spina bifida, which is a birth defect affecting the spinal column. The height of the defect varies which nerves have complete pathways or not, and so does the severity of it (some people with spina bifida do not have much or any damage to the spinal *cord*, most do) - this is somewhat similar to people whose spine is damaged in an accident. But people with cerebral palsy and many other conditions affecting their ability to stand and walk will similarly end up with pretty underdeveloped muscles in their lower half if they have never walked, so you can't (and shouldn't try to) guess.

If enough of the spine is affected to make someone be a wheelchair user then there is a chance that the nerves in charge of the bowel are also affected, but it varies a LOT. If the reason for being a wheelchair user is not to do with the spinal cord then it probably won't have any impact on continence.

But the other thing is just that you don't just 'have no control of your bowels' - if you cannot feel when you need to go and/or do not have full control of the relevant muscles, then you will learn techniques to manage this in early childhood. Those vary widely as obviously it's incredibly individual and personal, but the relevant bit is that pretty much everybody has bowel control *somehow*, even if the method of that control involves a suppository or whatever as part of their morning routine. Nobody is gonna go to work and chance having their body autonomously decide to take a dump without consulting them first!

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
After watching todays F1; Has a safety car ever crashed whilst leading a race?

southendpier

5,267 posts

230 months

Sunday 10th July 2016
quotequote all
227bhp said:
After watching todays F1; Has a safety car ever crashed whilst leading a race?
Yes. YouTube has a collection. Search safety car crashes. Iirc I can't remember a specific f1 incedent so maybe there hasn't been one but I'm sure indy cars had one barrelling into a car leaving the pit lane

Supersonic Welly

8,855 posts

188 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
How do they dyno run newly rebuilt engines without damaging them?
I thought rebuilt engines couldn't be revved above a certain rpm for X amount of miles?

BristolRich

545 posts

134 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
1980's Kids TV

What was the name of the mad crazy scientist/ proffessor that used to do mad experiments on kids tv (specifically ITV)? Looked a bit like Roy Wood out of Wizzard...

grumbledoak

31,551 posts

234 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
BristolRich said:
1980's Kids TV

What was the name of the mad crazy scientist/ proffessor that used to do mad experiments on kids tv (specifically ITV)? Looked a bit like Roy Wood out of Wizzard...
Presumably Prof Heinz Wolff?

kowalski655

14,656 posts

144 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
Or Wilf Lunn? Although he was more making weird stuff
Can't add a pic as I'm on a phone

98elise

26,658 posts

162 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
Ayahuasca said:
There are two-legged animals and four-legged animals, eight, six, 100 and 1,000 legged animals.

Why have no three-legged animals evolved?
There are three and five limbed animals (the tail counts as a limb).
Agreed.

If you've ever seen two kangaroos fighting there is no doubt their tail is an effective limb. At times they will only be standing in the tail while kicking with both legs.

Also monkeys with prehensile tails must be limbs.

Jonboy_t

5,038 posts

184 months

Monday 11th July 2016
quotequote all
98elise said:
Moonhawk said:
Ayahuasca said:
There are two-legged animals and four-legged animals, eight, six, 100 and 1,000 legged animals.

Why have no three-legged animals evolved?
There are three and five limbed animals (the tail counts as a limb).
Agreed.

If you've ever seen two kangaroos fighting there is no doubt their tail is an effective limb. At times they will only be standing in the tail while kicking with both legs.

Also monkeys with prehensile tails must be limbs.
I can't think of an animal with just two limbs plus a tail? Kangaroos have arms too, so are five limbed.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED