Nuclear power station location - an idea

Nuclear power station location - an idea

Author
Discussion

MartG

Original Poster:

20,694 posts

205 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
With today's news that it's expected to cost an extra £5billion to clean up Sellafield, I've come up with an idea about locating future nuclear power stations

First decide where you're going to bury the waste from it, then build the power station underground in that location so when it comes to decommissioning it all you have to do is pour a load of concrete into the hole to seal it up smile

Oakey

27,593 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
Building stuff underground is expensive.

tim0409

4,437 posts

160 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
and it needs to be near the sea.

-crookedtail-

1,564 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
The newest generation are going to be much cleaner than these old 60s ones. I think that they, the newest ones, are of a French design, the older ones were much dirtier due to the need/want of plutonium. nuts


Edited by -crookedtail- on Wednesday 4th March 21:21

RDM

1,860 posts

208 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
So it needs to be near water. Check.

Say you had a large building that was in need of multi-billion repairs that was already
government owned thereby cutting the purchase cost for the land.

It's obvious where to build it really... smile

dudleybloke

19,854 posts

187 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
RDM said:
So it needs to be near water. Check.

Say you had a large building that was in need of multi-billion repairs that was already
government owned thereby cutting the purchase cost for the land.

It's obvious where to build it really... smile
Well its called the seat of power. Makes sense to me.

princealbert23

2,579 posts

162 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
RDM said:
So it needs to be near water. Check.


It's obvious where to build it really... smile
Brighton?

MartG

Original Poster:

20,694 posts

205 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
RDM said:
So it needs to be near water. Check.

Say you had a large building that was in need of multi-billion repairs that was already
government owned thereby cutting the purchase cost for the land.

It's obvious where to build it really... smile
Low transmission losses too as most of its output would be consumed withing a 30 mile radius

mcdjl

5,451 posts

196 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
Most of the problem at Sellafield has almost nothing to do with making electricity.

Storer

5,024 posts

216 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
We were world leaders in Nuclear power. Due to our Government appeasing the anti nuclear brigade we will now have to pay a French company to build and run the only means of generating immediately available electricity for the 21st century.

We already use French nuclear power, imported via cable under the channel.

With Chinese money and Spanish companies building most of our solar farms we no longer produce even our own electricity.

God knows how we will ever sort our balance of payments out if we keep shipping profits out of this country.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,694 posts

205 months

Wednesday 4th March 2015
quotequote all
Storer said:
God knows how we will ever sort our balance of payments out if we keep shipping profits out of this country.
Even outsourcing of civil service jobs went primarily to US and French owned companies frown UK Government has a very poor record of 'Buying British'

mini me

1,435 posts

194 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
I heard on teh radio yesterday that we are now going to sell our share of the Eurotunnel to Canada.

Do we own any assets in other countries?


jkh112

22,073 posts

159 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
mini me said:
Do we own any assets in other countries?
The Falklands, Gibraltar?
getmecoat

Megaflow

9,444 posts

226 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
mini me said:
I heard on teh radio yesterday that we are now going to sell our share of the Eurotunnel to Canada.

Do we own any assets in other countries?
No, we are not.

We are going to sell our share of Eurostar off. Eurostar is the passenger rail service that runs in the Eurotunnel.

And until it was annouced that we were going to sell it, the vasy majority of the professional offended briadge didn't even know the UK had a stake in Eurostar as far as I can see.

BoRED S2upid

19,714 posts

241 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
This isn't an issue Anglesey wants another near the sea and an island there couldn't be a better location if it went wrong just blow up the bridge and seal off the island. We also have Scotland. Basically let Wales and Scotland generate power for the whole of the UK.

ShiningWit

10,203 posts

129 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Build it in Eastern Europe, there can't be anyone left there now can there?

grumbledoak

31,548 posts

234 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Underground is a bad place for them, in an emergency you probably want water to flow through them not flood them. And you don't really want to seal them in once done anyway. And the modern designs don't create the waste that old ones did (Sellafield imports it AFAIK).

We have tons of coastline that isn't about to announce a series of tedious independence referendums until they get the answer they want. Almost any one of them would do - let's put tidal power where that will work best, nuclear on the rest. Then the Russians and the Arabs can go f**k themselves. Done.

john2443

6,341 posts

212 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
ShiningWit said:
Build it in Eastern Europe, there can't be anyone left there now can there?
But, who would build it if there's no one there? We'd have to send a load of Polish builders over there to do it! biggrin

mini me

1,435 posts

194 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
No, we are not.

We are going to sell our share of Eurostar off. Eurostar is the passenger rail service that runs in the Eurotunnel.

And until it was annouced that we were going to sell it, the vasy majority of the professional offended briadge didn't even know the UK had a stake in Eurostar as far as I can see.
Calm down you are typing too fast!

I don't really see the difference, its still selling off our assets to another country which was kinda my point as you well know.




Fastchas

2,649 posts

122 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
mini me said:
I heard on teh radio yesterday that we are now going to sell our share of the Eurotunnel to Canada.

Do we own any assets in other countries?
This is a good move IMO.

Listened to a report on the radio last night. We are getting £757m for our 40% stake in Eurostar.
Profits from Eurostar earn the UK £20m per annum. Much better to sell it off and use the money getting the deficit down. It would take nearly 40 years for Eurostar to earn the taxpayer that much money.