The news, is it worth paying attention?

The news, is it worth paying attention?

Author
Discussion

LordGrover

33,539 posts

212 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
What they call news these days is mostly fluff. Best avoided.

RizzoTheRat

25,150 posts

192 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I tend to have a quick skim through the BBC news site at lunch times but other than that I get most of my current affairs from The News Quiz, Mock The Week, and a Have I Got News For You.

There are some elements of current affairs that are useful to have an idea about for work so I tend to keep an eye on them, but often the most useful informations comes from blogs and specialist sites rather than mainstream news outlets

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
ewenm said:
northwest monkey said:
Lost soul said:
There seems to be an obsession with companies profits , reporting on high street brands for example , when why did this start !!!
That's a very good question actually. Why are the quarterly profits for Morrisons or Tesco discussed on the news, whereas the likes of say Wolseley (FTSE 100 - "WOS") never get mentioned?
Public interest innit. The get out clause for reporting anything... just wheel out "it's in the public interest" and anything can be news. What "the public" are interested in (familiar names, celebrity, scandal) is NOT the same as "the public interest" (genuine news, important information).
The answer is quite simple. Go out into the street and see how many people can tell you who/what Wolseley are, do or make. Then ask the same people who/what Tesco are do or make.

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
ewenm said:
northwest monkey said:
Lost soul said:
There seems to be an obsession with companies profits , reporting on high street brands for example , when why did this start !!!
That's a very good question actually. Why are the quarterly profits for Morrisons or Tesco discussed on the news, whereas the likes of say Wolseley (FTSE 100 - "WOS") never get mentioned?
Public interest innit. The get out clause for reporting anything... just wheel out "it's in the public interest" and anything can be news. What "the public" are interested in (familiar names, celebrity, scandal) is NOT the same as "the public interest" (genuine news, important information).
The answer is quite simple. Go out into the street and see how many people can tell you who/what Wolseley are, do or make. Then ask the same people who/what Tesco are do or make.
Exactly - familiar names.

Brigand

2,544 posts

169 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I started a job just over four years ago that requires me to spend 48hrs a week with various rolling news channels playing in the background, whilst I read online news and media sources from all over the world for content on current affairs. Its reached the point now where every working hour I'm reading about bombings, suicide attacks, protests, public dissent, natural disasters, bus crashes, extreme weather, political strife and more, and its really rather depressing!

I assume the world has long been like this, but since being in my position it does seem that the past three years have seen the world turn very angry. There's not many countries in the world that aren't having large demonstrations at least once a week over something, normally austerity. Hell, even a handful of third-world nations are suffering austerity. I watched the Arab Spring flare from an uprising of the "common man" to the inferno of Islamist terror groups, and things are only getting worse.

Its nice to spend a couple of days off shift where I can go into a bubble of ignorance. I don't really watch the news when at home and ignorance really is bliss in comparison.

LordGrover

33,539 posts

212 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Brigand said:
I started a job just over four years ago that requires me to spend 48hrs a week with various rolling news channels playing in the background, whilst I read online news and media sources from all over the world for content on current affairs. Its reached the point now where every working hour I'm reading about bombings, suicide attacks, protests, public dissent, natural disasters, bus crashes, extreme weather, political strife and more, and its really rather depressing!

I assume the world has long been like this, but since being in my position it does seem that the past three years have seen the world turn very angry. There's not many countries in the world that aren't having large demonstrations at least once a week over something, normally austerity. Hell, even a handful of third-world nations are suffering austerity. I watched the Arab Spring flare from an uprising of the "common man" to the inferno of Islamist terror groups, and things are only getting worse.

Its nice to spend a couple of days off shift where I can go into a bubble of ignorance. I don't really watch the news when at home and ignorance really is bliss in comparison.
Would there be all this unrest and rebellion were it not reported?
It's possible that were all reporting to stop they would be starved of publicity and so become pointless and the world a more peaceful place. hippy

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Would there be all this unrest and rebellion were it not reported?
It's possible that were all reporting to stop they would be starved of publicity and so become pointless and the world a more peaceful place. hippy
Same applies to pointless celebrities. Stop talking about them on the news & they'll soon fk off and get a job.

The Don of Croy

5,993 posts

159 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Are we more upset over the 'real news' or just the current obsession with 'comment on news' which tends (imho) to stretch out any story to an endless game of 'he said - she said'?

When even pissant local telly station has to 'go over live now' every night to some godforesaken dump (usually Gravesend or Thanet) where something happened 12 hours earlier, but there's always a comment to be made...

However, if we didn't have all this guff what would all those PR/media peeps do all day?

Brigand

2,544 posts

169 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Would there be all this unrest and rebellion were it not reported?
It's possible that were all reporting to stop they would be starved of publicity and so become pointless and the world a more peaceful place. hippy
Unlikely, with regards to the bombings and killings, that stuff is happening to to religious/tribal/political/ideological reasons, it being reported on isn't going to stop Boko Haram or Islamic State from continuing their rampage.

The demonstrations etc may thrive from media coverage, as may an independent terrorist looking to further his cause, but the majority of the miserable stuff going on in the world is happening regardless.

heyhomes

118 posts

126 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I'm trying to avoid news and 'media' as much as possible these days as the only real effect that 99.99999% of it has on my life is to annoy me or put me in a bad mood.


McWigglebum4th

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
The Don of Croy said:
That's all very well to cut yourself off from the nightly news, but tell me, without it how would you know;

That Milliband has a kitchen?

That Clarkson has not had a contract renewed?

That after a tragic place crash reporters stand around amongst many helicopters?

That Premiership footballers sometimes score goals?

You'd be marginalised, bereft...
Without sounding harsh

None of those effect me

And not knowing about them would have zero effect on my life

Bill

52,704 posts

255 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
News is big business, dependent on viewer numbers to measure its success. And human nature means that bad news sells much better than good.

What I really don't get is the sports news. Surely anyone who is interested in Man U's game (Say) has either watched it or is going to watch it later, so a summary is boring to most, repetitive to some others and a spoiler for the rest. silly

Hoofy

76,345 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
Nope. I stopped watching the news this year for precisily that reason.

In the grand scheme of things, unless it directly impacts you, very little actually matters, the world will carry on turning.
You probably feel better but how will you know it directly impacts you if you don't listen to it every hour on the hour? biggrin

Galsia

2,167 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
MOD DON'T MOVE THIS TO NEWS READ THE POST


On the drive to work it was yet another morning of entire world is st and we are all going to die

The news is always the world is st and we are all going to die


Is it really worth paying attention?

Would my life be better if i just ignored the mainstream media completely?
I've avoided media events for some time now. Missed the Royal Wedding completely and haven't even seen what their child looks like nor do I want to. Didn't watch the Jubilee either. Nothing missed in my opinion.

I made the decision to avoid the news as much as possible this year. Anything that is of importance I hear about at work anyway.

I completely missed the shootings in Paris. No effect on me whatever.

Flicked through the channels and saw the media camping outside the house of some poor relative of the France plane crash.

I don't miss st like that at all.

Hoofy

76,345 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Actually, there is one thing that drives me mad in the news and on LBC in general - they go on and on about politics like it's the only important thing in the world. I am so fking sick of hearing about it that I've started listening to music stations again.

There's something about Prince Charles' private letters to someone or another. I DON'T GIVE A fk.

soad

32,890 posts

176 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I don't watch the news because it's (mostly) useless ste. It's boring and depressing.

Often manipulated to appeal to a certain crowd, or win the public opinion of a certain political party etc.

Sump

5,484 posts

167 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I allow 9gag to be my news channel aswell as Liveleak. Liveleak for completely neutral gore videos that haven't been modified. 9gag as it's pretty upto date and quite accurate with opinions.

MG CHRIS

9,082 posts

167 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
heyhomes said:
I'm trying to avoid news and 'media' as much as possible these days as the only real effect that 99.99999% of it has on my life is to annoy me or put me in a bad mood.
This also on top of this I avoid things that will make me get angry like watching programmes like benefit britian, most of the threads in news section on here and various crap on fb etc. Removing the negative st in your life and you become more happier.

groundcontrol

1,539 posts

191 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
I've not watched/read/paid any interest to the news in years, it's great. If anything major happens someone will tell me or I'll inadvertently hear it on the radio.

IIRC there is a publication somewhere that is just 'good news', which is far less depressing/fear-mongering.

Calletrece

320 posts

130 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all