Bought or Brought?

Author
Discussion

simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Hackney said:
- sickth - no, there's an X in it. It's pronounced sicksth.
That's all very well until you realise it takes 3 seconds to say it, and you've got slavers everywhere biggrin

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
simoid said:
Hackney said:
- sickth - no, there's an X in it. It's pronounced sicksth.
That's all very well until you realise it takes 3 seconds to say it, and you've got slavers everywhere biggrin
A note for those south of Gretna; he means "drool".

Alapeno

1,391 posts

147 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Defiantly winds me up to!

ALBA MELV

387 posts

156 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Bought / brought is a pet hate of mine.

If posted on a forum or face ache, I tend to ask "Where did you bring your new car/bike/shoes/cat from?" Quite often the poster doesn't get it and will answer as if I had typed buy instead of bring.

Edited by ALBA MELV on Tuesday 26th May 15:22

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Vipers said:
sparkythecat said:
Vipers said:
What really irritates me is when our daughter is explaining a conversation she had with a friend, instead of saying "She said.........", she says "and she goes .......", "and I go........"
It's not half as irritating as " I was like......" , " and she was like... " when used in the same context
banghead
That as well, join the club.

smile
An ex of mine, used to turn around when she was talking to people, then they would turn around, then she would again. I personally can't have a conversation with people if they don't look at you or vice versa.

"He turned around and said this"
"Then I turned around and said no"
"Then Sarah turned around and said why not?"

Used to drive me insane. It would even come out in the middle of sentences for no reason.

".....and he turned around, then we put the stuff on the shelves." or even better was "She turned around...(pause)...and I said this like"

That was a 32 year old by the way who used to think she was great with English.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
That was a 32 year old by the way who used to think she was great with English.
Plainly not. How was she with French?

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
I fear for our youth anyway - they're so easily startled and bemused. Everything's "amazing" these days (if it isn't "amazeballs").

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.
Yes, which is laughing out loud, as I described.

If "rotflmao" had been typed, then I would have asked if he had in fact rolled about on the floor whilst laughing and somehow simultaneously, his arse fell off as a direct result of the laughing.

Edited by IvanSTi on Tuesday 26th May 16:02

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.
Well then I would have asked if he had in fact rolled about on the floor whilst laughing and somehow simultaneously, his arse fell off as a direct result of the laughing.
It is possible to laugh out loud without "bursting into fits of laughter" you know. A single, audibly expressed, chuckle will suffice.

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
That was a 32 year old by the way who used to think she was great with English.
Plainly not. How was she with French?
I have no idea, I didn't have the need to speak to her in French.

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.
Well then I would have asked if he had in fact rolled about on the floor whilst laughing and somehow simultaneously, his arse fell off as a direct result of the laughing.
It is possible to laugh out loud without "bursting into fits of laughter" you know. A single, audibly expressed, chuckle will suffice.
That's not laughing, that's chuckling.

Oh and congratulations on the successful humour bypass, it obviously went well. thumbup

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.
Well then I would have asked if he had in fact rolled about on the floor whilst laughing and somehow simultaneously, his arse fell off as a direct result of the laughing.
It is possible to laugh out loud without "bursting into fits of laughter" you know. A single, audibly expressed, chuckle will suffice.
That's not laughing, that's chuckling.

Oh and congratulations on the successful humour bypass, it obviously went well. thumbup
Or perhaps you weren't funny? Oh and you seem to have missed the "French" joke. No matter - have a good day. I should get on with some work.

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
Einion Yrth said:
IvanSTi said:
PoleDriver said:
bigunit00 said:
PoleDriver said:
An acronym used in correct context. And your point is? ........
A chavy item of textspeak has no place in a thread which is discussing the intelligent use of the English language!smile
I wonder if he did actually burst into fits of laughter after writing that, therefore technically, is correct.
He used lol, not roflmao.
Well then I would have asked if he had in fact rolled about on the floor whilst laughing and somehow simultaneously, his arse fell off as a direct result of the laughing.
It is possible to laugh out loud without "bursting into fits of laughter" you know. A single, audibly expressed, chuckle will suffice.
That's not laughing, that's chuckling.

Oh and congratulations on the successful humour bypass, it obviously went well. thumbup
Or perhaps you weren't funny? Oh and you seem to have missed the "French" joke. No matter - have a good day. I should get on with some work.
Hmmm likewise, well done on the French "Joke"

Galileo

3,145 posts

218 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
bigunit00 said:
How some people get this mixed up is beyond me. It literally is basic English. It instantly calls into question your level of education and intelligence. Not only should you be corrected, but you should want to be corrected so that you don't continue to walk around sounding like an uneducated retard, lol.
Doesn't it, though?

rohrl

8,725 posts

145 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
OP should of linked to a pacific post so we could see what he means.

groundcontrol

1,539 posts

191 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
PoleDriver said:
Wear, wear?
Over their.

HTP99

22,531 posts

140 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Advice, advise.

Fun Bus

17,911 posts

218 months

Tuesday 26th May 2015
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
TREMAiNE said:
Fun Bus said:
TREMAiNE said:
Fun Bus said:
Your worrying to much.
  • You're
Please tell me you posted that in jest?
Poor grammar is one of my biggest hates!
You missed the incorrect use of 'to' ... wink
Yes, it was all fking intentional due to the nature of the thread and me thinking I'll try and be a bit funny.

Christ.