Celebrity Dead Pool 2016
Discussion
If the Queen were to pass, I wonder if Charles would skip his responsibility (what's the word? Can't be abdicate if he hasn't been crowned...)
Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
dxg said:
If the Queen were to pass, I wonder if Charles would skip his responsibility (what's the word? Can't be abdicate if he hasn't been crowned...)
Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
No chance I'd say. He has waited decades!Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
p1stonhead said:
dxg said:
If the Queen were to pass, I wonder if Charles would skip his responsibility (what's the word? Can't be abdicate if he hasn't been crowned...)
Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
No chance I'd say. He has waited decades!Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge. Whereas, passing the role down to William could well have the opposite effect: it would give the country some hope for the future, anyway.
My 2p.
dxg said:
Anyway, my point being - a future with Charles as the Head of State could well set up a pessimistic atmosphere across the country that may well push many over the edge.
Over the edge? Not trying to start an argument, but could you explain? Do you mean people leaving the country, republican uprising, riots in the streets?
PhilTheGreek said:
Higgs boson said:
PhilTheGreek said:
Iva Barchetta said:
Is Phil the Greek on Twitter ?
Yes, now f
k off you nosey, slanty-eyed peasant. Do you want some?
One is sending round the corgis in the morning, and they're 'ungry. One is advised to run away.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff