Annoying PH behaviours/phrases

Annoying PH behaviours/phrases

Author
Discussion

sunnydude

907 posts

128 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
TartanPaint said:
You jest, but PH is called DadsNet in our house. paperbag
Or they should call mumsnet "Ovenheads"

Monkeylegend

26,475 posts

232 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
zarjaz1991 said:
You could put me into ANY vehicle and I would be able to drive it safely. I might not be able to drive it safely at 200mph, but I will be able to drive it safely on the road. Anyone who can't do that and who thinks a car is 'dangerously slow', is not a very good driver.
bowtank


Lucas CAV

3,025 posts

220 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
rohrl said:
What pisses me off most about PH is when one person decides to take over a discussion thread by steamrollering everyone else into submission.

They will write out huge long subdivided posts in which they will make spurious claims as if they're the word of God himself. They will pompously accuse everyone else of using strawman and ad hominem arguments. They will make it impossible to have a reasonable discussion through their tedious posting style and possibly most annoying of all they'll use the sniggering smiley which is the badge of the most arrogant of know-it-all prats.
Even worse than that are the whingeing puppies who do use strawmen, go ad hominem at the loss of an argument (i.e. early on), fail to address all aspects of a post they're repying to because they have nothing to offer but will hypocritically criticise others who do, then get annoyed when PHers pick apart what they say, finally running off to cry to mummy in The Lounge about it. At least all the other whiners cam do a me-too and feel better. Not a subdivided post in sight and no smiley, this is rohrl perfection no less and what a relief to have such lofty approval for posting on a public forum...which reminds me, the reeeaaally annoying people are those who moan because they can't control how other people write posts and act like those who think differently are doing something wrong.
The armour cracks !

SlimJim16v

5,689 posts

144 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
PHmember said:
Referring to your wife or girlfriend as 'Mrs' followed by your own username.
On another forum, they're referred to as the 710

Lucas CAV

3,025 posts

220 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
What is going on with the quoting .....

Nik da Greek

2,503 posts

151 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
SlimJim16v said:
PHmember said:
Referring to your wife or girlfriend as 'Mrs' followed by your own username.
On another forum, they're referred to as the 710
Ahhhh... cos of the "where do I buy some 710 to pour in the car?" wheeze hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
What is going on with the quoting .....
Turboblokes posts have become so pompous and intolerably long that you can't even quote him now.

Lucas CAV

3,025 posts

220 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
Let alone multi quote!
el stovey said:
Lucas CAV said:
What is going on with the quoting .....
Turboblokes posts have become so pompous and intolerably long that you can't even quote him now.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,427 posts

151 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
zarjaz1991 said:
You could put me into ANY vehicle and I would be able to drive it safely. I might not be able to drive it safely at 200mph, but I will be able to drive it safely on the road. Anyone who can't do that and who thinks a car is 'dangerously slow', is not a very good driver.
It comes back to "accelerating out of danger", an oft trotted out phrased used by people to justify buying a powerful vehicle that they almost certainly don't need, but just want.

In 36 yrs of driving I've accelerated out of danger about 3 times, and on each occasion it was because I stupidly put myself in a daft position. A position I wouldn't have been in had I been driving a slower car in the first place.



Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
It comes back to "accelerating out of danger", an oft trotted out phrased used by people to justify buying a powerful vehicle that they almost certainly don't need, but just want.

In 36 yrs of driving I've accelerated out of danger about 3 times, and on each occasion it was because I stupidly put myself in a daft position. A position I wouldn't have been in had I been driving a slower car in the first place.
That's the first time I think I've ever seen you admit to being wrong about anything!

mikees

2,751 posts

173 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Gad-Westy said:
As oppose to 'future ex mrs...'
Specifically put that in as a tongue in cheek comment, and yes she is aware I use it lightheatedly
From Jurassic Park? Jeff Goldberg - " I'm always on the lookout for a future ex Mrs Malcolm"

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
Ad hominem, genuine 'bell marker' that one, closely followed by Americanisms, they're just daft.

BoostedStig

641 posts

169 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
Every classic Citroen is beautiful and every 100k garage needs an Audi estate/Land Rover.
Just two behavioural issues I have.
More like cliches now i think about it....

princealbert23

2,583 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
EnglishTony said:
0000 said:
If the last general election was held in NP&E UKIP would've won.
That maybe the site's owners' preference. Haymarket is connected to Michael Heseltine and it's his old seat Boris Johnson now represents.
That's an example of another overused phrase that isnt 'big or clever'- 'Tin Foil Hat'

princealbert23

2,583 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
ATTAK Z said:
I'll just leave this here
Just saying

thenortherner

1,502 posts

164 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
Any mention of 'bork' is the hallmark of a bell end.

princealbert23

2,583 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
rohrl said:
What pisses me off most about PH is when one person decides to take over a discussion thread by steamrollering everyone else into submission.

They will write out huge long subdivided posts in which they will make spurious claims as if they're the word of God himself. They will pompously accuse everyone else of using strawman and ad hominem arguments. They will make it impossible to have a reasonable discussion through their tedious posting style and possibly most annoying of all they'll use the sniggering smiley which is the badge of the most arrogant of know-it-all prats.
Very true- you should have a limit on the number of times you can contribute to a topic

greygoose

8,271 posts

196 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
princealbert23 said:
rohrl said:
What pisses me off most about PH is when one person decides to take over a discussion thread by steamrollering everyone else into submission.

They will write out huge long subdivided posts in which they will make spurious claims as if they're the word of God himself. They will pompously accuse everyone else of using strawman and ad hominem arguments. They will make it impossible to have a reasonable discussion through their tedious posting style and possibly most annoying of all they'll use the sniggering smiley which is the badge of the most arrogant of know-it-all prats.
Very true- you should have a limit on the number of times you can contribute to a topic
But boring everyone else into submission means they win the Internet rather than watching the BBC.

princealbert23

2,583 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
crankedup said:
Prof Prolapse said:
It's not a phrase, but the fact 70% of posters are this man irritates me.

Indeed, although I would place it at a higher rate of around 95%.
I would suggest that the number of the same lefties who are always posting on NP&E, queuing up here to say it is inhabited overwhelmingly by the right is evidence they are wrong. Look folks - the real world contains people with other views and they dont necessarily echo those of your mates on Facebook, Twitter and CiF. It must be hard coming to terms with people posting opposing views and I am sure you secretly desire some Stalinist censorship of counter-revolutionary views.

princealbert23

2,583 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
greygoose said:
princealbert23 said:
rohrl said:
What pisses me off most about PH is when one person decides to take over a discussion thread by steamrollering everyone else into submission.

They will write out huge long subdivided posts in which they will make spurious claims as if they're the word of God himself. They will pompously accuse everyone else of using strawman and ad hominem arguments. They will make it impossible to have a reasonable discussion through their tedious posting style and possibly most annoying of all they'll use the sniggering smiley which is the badge of the most arrogant of know-it-all prats.
Very true- you should have a limit on the number of times you can contribute to a topic
But boring everyone else into submission means they win the Internet rather than watching the BBC.
Well the gender change thread was one which irked me, with one particular poster being a right tt