Police detain 11 year of girl with a neurological disability

Police detain 11 year of girl with a neurological disability

Author
Discussion

davidball

Original Poster:

731 posts

202 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
From the BBC today.

An 11-year-old girl with a neurological disability was handcuffed and restrained with a mesh hood and leg straps while being held in custody.

The child was arrested, handcuffed and hooded by Sussex Police for minor offences. If that was not bad enough she was held for 60 hours without an appropriate adult. Can you imagine how terrifying that must have been for her.

Has any police officer been punished for these assaults on her.

Two retired (with full pension?) No change to normal disciplinary procedures there then.

“Management action” was taken against six custody sergeants. It would be interesting to know what that means.

The two officers who restrained the girl with handcuffs have been disciplined. No doubt the slap on the wrist did not hurt as much as the forcible cuffing did.

Another custody sergeant was disciplined for not informing an appropriate adult in a timely manner.

Three other officers had no further action taken against them. Does that suggest that some action had already been taken against them?

Are the details of the disciplinary action taken against all these officers a state secret or will we get to know what, if any, punishment has been metered out to them?

Do not hold your breath.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-sussex-36472234

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36483552


Edited by davidball on Wednesday 8th June 17:27

Magic919

14,126 posts

201 months

jamesson

2,987 posts

221 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
Do tell us your experiences in dealing with violent children with mental health issues. I'd love to know how you would have handled this.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
I'm surprised she was taken to the cells when sectioned under the mental health act. Usually social services and the NHS are falling over themselves to help with what is their area of business. Oh wait...

An 11 year old should rarely be taken to the police cells.

Restraints etc are used primarily to stop the detainee hurting themselves. It's better to restrain them than have them hit their head off the walls, bite their fingers off / make ligatures etc. It's also more controlled than having people use the force upon them.

davidball said:
Are the details of the disciplinary action taken against all these officers a state secret or will we get to know what, if any, punishment has been metered out to them?
You've already quoted it... It's 'management advice' i.e. words of advice. The lowest outcome.

Regardless of the lack of severity, they are seemingly avoidable things.

shep1001

4,599 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
I think the duration of the ordeal is totally unacceptable given her age & medical condition, the failings go beyond the police as she was already in the system.

However, if temporary restraining her minimised or eliminated the risk of her injuring herself and/or others (which leaves the police open to compo claims) then I don't see what other option they had. I wouldn't put up with being spat at or physically assaulted so why should the police?

Edited by shep1001 on Wednesday 8th June 17:45

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
We've had kids sat in cells for days because the NHS has NO BEDS anywhere in the UK for them.


Yet again the police are forced into dealing with someone elses job.

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

117 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
davidball said:
The child was arrested, handcuffed and hooded by Sussex Police for minor offences.
How do you suggest the police control someone who refuses to stop spitting?

singlecoil

33,545 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
As usual the police were the last stop on what we can safely assume was a long road of mental health system inadequacies.

The idea that they would have anything at all to do with her if they didn't have to is laughable. They wouldn't have kept her in a cell at all if there had been any other choice, and they wouldn't have kept her there that long if there had been any other choice.

jamesson

2,987 posts

221 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
Statement from Sussex Police Federation regarding the IPCC report into Sussex Police interaction with Child H

“We are disappointed with the way our officers are being portrayed regarding their dealings with this Child H. Although only 11, she displayed a high level of violence and her restraint was necessary to prevent her harming herself or others. When someone of any age or mental capacity displays violence towards themselves or others, it is not practical to carry out a health assessment there and then and they are restrained to prevent injury. Not to do so would be neglectful.

It is interesting to note that her mother is reported to have said “what she needed was patience, respect and the support of her mother”. It is therefore slightly ironic that it was her mother who felt the need to call the police on several occasions.

It is also sad to note that yet again the police service is the emergency service of last resort when there are other public bodies who could and should been dealing with Child H. The Police Federation has for the last few years been saying that police cells are not the place for people with mental health issues but in reality in a lot of cases, we remain the default position.

We are unable to comment further as the IPCC have chosen not to share their report with the officers concerned but it is also of interest to note that despite what is being reported, no officer was dealt with by way of formal misconduct procedures”.

davidball

Original Poster:

731 posts

202 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
jamesson said:
Do tell us your experiences in dealing with violent children with mental health issues. I'd love to know how you would have handled this.
Obviously your run of the mill police officer is neither trained nor able to deal with a child like this and proper medical and psychological professionals should have been informed immediately. Torturing the child with handcuffs applied with arms behind her back, leg restraints and a hood was never going to calm the girl down. They failed miserably in their duty of care to the girl. The abysmal minimal disciplinary action taken against these officers shows that the Hillsborough syndrome of disregard for natural justice is still rampant in some police forces.

rxe

6,700 posts

103 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
One does wonder where the outraged mother was for this large number of hours.

If I had a mentally ill child who wasn't at home for the night, I'd be down the local cop shop sharpish. In fact, I probably would let the child out on its own if it was such a liability.

davidball

Original Poster:

731 posts

202 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
rxe said:
One does wonder where the outraged mother was for this large number of hours.

If I had a mentally ill child who wasn't at home for the night, I'd be down the local cop shop sharpish. In fact, I probably would let the child out on its own if it was such a liability.
I agree entirely. If my handicapped child was held by the police in such circumstances I would have a lawyer with me at the police station within the hour raising all kinds of hell.

singlecoil

33,545 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
The BBC feasted on this story on the lunchtime news. I should have realised then that David would be keen to make his views on the police known (as if they weren't well known enough already).

shep1001

4,599 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
rxe said:
One does wonder where the outraged mother was for this large number of hours.

If I had a mentally ill child who wasn't at home for the night, I'd be down the local cop shop sharpish. In fact, I probably would let the child out on its own if it was such a liability.
I am sure it was on the radio she was deemed not to be an 'appropriate adult' so she was aware of the situation unfolding?

davidball

Original Poster:

731 posts

202 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
The BBC feasted on this story on the lunchtime news. I should have realised then that David would be keen to make his views on the police known (as if they weren't well known enough already).
I am not surprised that one of the usual apologists for police misconduct has woken up.

Elroy Blue

8,687 posts

192 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
I was waiting for one of the usual suspects to pick this up. Highly predictable.

Can you show me in that report where there is any mention of mental health services, the NHS, ambulance, social services. There isn't. Because as usual they say bks, nothing to do with us. I've had our wonderful mental health unit slam the door in my face because a kid was 'aggressive'. Stood there thinking "now what?"

She was in the cells because her parents and every other 'specialist' washed their hands of her and expected the Police to magically solve the situation.

So Mr 'David ACAB' Ball. Please do offer your solution in dealing with a violent, aggressive individual who is constantly spitting in your face and constantly attacking you. Not for five minutes or thirty minutes, for hour, after hour, after hour. Please do share your expertise. We're all dying to know

jamesson

2,987 posts

221 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
davidball said:
Obviously your run of the mill police officer is neither trained nor able to deal with a child like this and proper medical and psychological professionals should have been informed immediately. Torturing the child with handcuffs applied with arms behind her back, leg restraints and a hood was never going to calm the girl down. They failed miserably in their duty of care to the girl. The abysmal minimal disciplinary action taken against these officers shows that the Hillsborough syndrome of disregard for natural justice is still rampant in some police forces.
Applying handcuffs is not torture. Neither are leg restraints. Same goes for a spit hood. They are all there to protect the person to whom they are applied or anyone else dealing with them.

Their duty of care to the girl is to prevent her from harming herself. They also have a duty of care to protect other people.

Perhaps the minimal disciplinary action is a result of knowing the full facts of the case, something you don't.

As per one of my previous post, how would you have dealt with it?

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
davidball said:
Obviously your run of the mill police officer is neither trained nor able to deal with a child like this and proper medical and psychological professionals should have been informed immediately. Torturing the child with handcuffs applied with arms behind her back, leg restraints and a hood was never going to calm the girl down. They failed miserably in their duty of care to the girl. The abysmal minimal disciplinary action taken against these officers shows that the Hillsborough syndrome of disregard for natural justice is still rampant in some police forces.
Hillsborough? Oh do fk off.

Maybe the officers should have stood and got bitten, punched and spat at?

singlecoil

33,545 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
davidball said:
singlecoil said:
The BBC feasted on this story on the lunchtime news. I should have realised then that David would be keen to make his views on the police known (as if they weren't well known enough already).
I am not surprised that one of the usual apologists for police misconduct has woken up.
Well, I'm not surprised you would see it that way.

I am proud to speak up on behalf on the police whenever I see them being unfairly treated by know-it-all police hating types like you.

davidball

Original Poster:

731 posts

202 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
I was waiting for one of the usual suspects to pick this up. Highly predictable.

Can you show me in that report where there is any mention of mental health services, the NHS, ambulance, social services. There isn't. Because as usual they say bks, nothing to do with us. I've had our wonderful mental health unit slam the door in my face because a kid was 'aggressive'. Stood there thinking "now what?"

She was in the cells because her parents and every other 'specialist' washed their hands of her and expected the Police to magically solve the situation.

So Mr 'David ACAB' Ball. Please do offer your solution in dealing with a violent, aggressive individual who is constantly spitting in your face and constantly attacking you. Not for five minutes or thirty minutes, for hour, after hour, after hour. Please do share your expertise. We're all dying to know
Having spent some time studying and working with such patients as part of my psychology degree I can state with certainty that using such force on them is counter productive.

As for your ACAB slur. It is of no consequence. I firmly believe you can only be offended by the opinions of people you respect.