911. Do People Actually Believe This S**t?
Discussion
Zod said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
so were the other buildings also controlled demolition too?
did the planes actually hit at all?
why did they supposedly blow up this WTC7 in particular? just to hide some scary secret files?
I think it was to destroy one of Hilary's email servers.did the planes actually hit at all?
why did they supposedly blow up this WTC7 in particular? just to hide some scary secret files?
peter tdci said:
Zod said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
so were the other buildings also controlled demolition too?
did the planes actually hit at all?
why did they supposedly blow up this WTC7 in particular? just to hide some scary secret files?
I think it was to destroy one of Hilary's email servers.did the planes actually hit at all?
why did they supposedly blow up this WTC7 in particular? just to hide some scary secret files?
scherzkeks said:
A44RON said:
GreigM said:
scherzkeks said:
And, freefall is, as a scientific fact, indisputable. The question now is whether the crime will ever be treated as such and investigated properly.
NIST addressed this extensively. There were effectively 3 phases in the fall of the building, the middle of which approached the speed of "free fall" as you say, but the initial stage was not as quick, which indicates the buckling of structures underneath rather than any sort of explosion theory. Add to that the COMPLETE lack of sound - if the "freefall" theory had any merit whatsoever, the explosives involved would have to detonate simultaneously and that would generate a sound wave unmissable within a half mile radius (i.e. ear-bleeding loud), but there was absolutely no sound of that nature heard or recorded. The theory has no merit whatsoever. Repeating easily disprovable stuff marks you out as a crackpot.
I'll ask this every time you post, every single friggin' time until you provide a plausible answer.
"How were the buildings rigged for detonation"?
WinstonWolf said:
scherzkeks said:
A44RON said:
GreigM said:
scherzkeks said:
And, freefall is, as a scientific fact, indisputable. The question now is whether the crime will ever be treated as such and investigated properly.
NIST addressed this extensively. There were effectively 3 phases in the fall of the building, the middle of which approached the speed of "free fall" as you say, but the initial stage was not as quick, which indicates the buckling of structures underneath rather than any sort of explosion theory. Add to that the COMPLETE lack of sound - if the "freefall" theory had any merit whatsoever, the explosives involved would have to detonate simultaneously and that would generate a sound wave unmissable within a half mile radius (i.e. ear-bleeding loud), but there was absolutely no sound of that nature heard or recorded. The theory has no merit whatsoever. Repeating easily disprovable stuff marks you out as a crackpot.
I'll ask this every time you post, every single friggin' time until you provide a plausible answer.
"How were the buildings rigged for detonation"?
Zod said:
WinstonWolf said:
scherzkeks said:
A44RON said:
GreigM said:
scherzkeks said:
And, freefall is, as a scientific fact, indisputable. The question now is whether the crime will ever be treated as such and investigated properly.
NIST addressed this extensively. There were effectively 3 phases in the fall of the building, the middle of which approached the speed of "free fall" as you say, but the initial stage was not as quick, which indicates the buckling of structures underneath rather than any sort of explosion theory. Add to that the COMPLETE lack of sound - if the "freefall" theory had any merit whatsoever, the explosives involved would have to detonate simultaneously and that would generate a sound wave unmissable within a half mile radius (i.e. ear-bleeding loud), but there was absolutely no sound of that nature heard or recorded. The theory has no merit whatsoever. Repeating easily disprovable stuff marks you out as a crackpot.
I'll ask this every time you post, every single friggin' time until you provide a plausible answer.
"How were the buildings rigged for detonation"?
deckster said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
you mean... what if Trump emailed his tax returns to Hillary, and she stored them in WTC7!?
Well I've just read it on the internet, so it must be true.https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=RD1sxZ4tsp8gc&a...
And now some muzik, musikIsIS sorry musikkk, what like those young Ben Elton stlyee "young adults" like to listen to before dashing off to get a window seat on a British rail Inter City 125 whilst barging past old folk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sxZ4tsp8gc&li...
And now some muzik, musikIsIS sorry musikkk, what like those young Ben Elton stlyee "young adults" like to listen to before dashing off to get a window seat on a British rail Inter City 125 whilst barging past old folk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sxZ4tsp8gc&li...
My CT FB friend posted this today!?
And posted this to authenticate it...
https://www.rt.com/usa/361385-pentagon-pr-firm-ter...
And posted this to authenticate it...
https://www.rt.com/usa/361385-pentagon-pr-firm-ter...
Legacywr said:
My CT FB friend posted this today!?
And posted this to authenticate it...
https://www.rt.com/usa/361385-pentagon-pr-firm-ter...
It must be true - it's on Russia Today. Bell Pottinger paid $500m? Utter bks.And posted this to authenticate it...
https://www.rt.com/usa/361385-pentagon-pr-firm-ter...
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff