High-class escorts.

[johnwilliams77]

xjay1337 said:

As long as they're happy, who cares? They're retired at 40, you are slogging the 9-5 until you're 75.

Tell me who's happier....

I dont know how happy they are and dont care but I enjoy my work and can retire at 55.

[Cold]

johnwilliams77 said:

I dont know how happy they are and dont care but I enjoy my work and can retire at 55.

Can you still get work as a gigolo at 55? I'm impressed.

[DonkeyApple]

xjay1337 said:

MarshPhantom said:

I'd say having your lifestyle funded by the money your wife made from prostitution is rather sleazy.

As long as they're happy, who cares? They're retired at 40, you are slogging the 9-5 until you're 75.

Tell me who's happier....

I doubt they are truly both retired at 40. The basic maths of renting clunge out for say 20 years isn't going to yield enough net profit to finance 20-40 additional years of zero income. Even running a double revenue spot roast system on a near industrial scale is unlikely to yield the returns required. Unless the lifestyle is such that instead of being retired they are in fact unemployed jobseekers or had additional revenues?

[johnwilliams77]

Cold said:

Can you still get work as a gigolo at 55? I'm impressed.

Give it a shot - clearly something you're interested in.

[MarshPhantom]

xjay1337 said:

MarshPhantom said:

I'd say having your lifestyle funded by the money your wife made from prostitution is rather sleazy.

As long as they're happy, who cares? They're retired at 40, you are slogging the 9-5 until you're 75.

Tell me who's happier....

I'd rather never retire than put the O/H on the game.

[anonymous-user]

MarshPhantom said:

I'd rather never retire than put the O/H on the game.

Each to their own.

[The Beaver King]

DonkeyApple said:

I doubt they are truly both retired at 40. The basic maths of renting clunge out for say 20 years isn't going to yield enough net profit to finance 20-40 additional years of zero income. Even running a double revenue spot roast system on a near industrial scale is unlikely to yield the returns required. Unless the lifestyle is such that instead of being retired they are in fact unemployed jobseekers or had additional revenues?

PH: Where the economics of prostitution matters

[xjay1337]

MarshPhantom said:

xjay1337 said:

MarshPhantom said:

I'd say having your lifestyle funded by the money your wife made from prostitution is rather sleazy.

As long as they're happy, who cares? They're retired at 40, you are slogging the 9-5 until you're 75.

Tell me who's happier....

I'd rather never retire than put the O/H on the game.

But the O/H put herself on the game.

If they are happy with that, who are you to judge?

Are you John's pimp by any chance?

[DonkeyApple]

The Beaver King said:

DonkeyApple said:

I doubt they are truly both retired at 40. The basic maths of renting clunge out for say 20 years isn't going to yield enough net profit to finance 20-40 additional years of zero income. Even running a double revenue spot roast system on a near industrial scale is unlikely to yield the returns required. Unless the lifestyle is such that instead of being retired they are in fact unemployed jobseekers or had additional revenues?

PH: Where the economics of prostitution matters

What can I say, I'm just a bit more pimp than we I guess.

[Tuna]

DonkeyApple said:

I doubt they are truly both retired at 40. The basic maths of renting clunge out for say 20 years isn't going to yield enough net profit to finance 20-40 additional years of zero income. Even running a double revenue spot roast system on a near industrial scale is unlikely to yield the returns required. Unless the lifestyle is such that instead of being retired they are in fact unemployed jobseekers or had additional revenues?

I'd suspect that depends very much on which end of the market you're at. Excess income in your early twenties, if wisely invested, can make a disproportionate difference to your lifestyle later on. Given their age, a little property investment in the 90's would potentially have set them up for life. Certainly not 'living on a yacht' wealthy, but comfortably enough.

And there's some suspicion that a good proportion of that income is tax free.

[Shnozz]

I have only known one full on escort but count among my friends a number of strippers. It's very much the exception that any of them wisely invest their earnings. A few buy a house but that is about the extent of it and these days with fewer self-cert/make believe mortgages on the market even that is less common. Most of them live a lifestyle that is hand to mouth and country to country.

[robm3]

boxst said:

DonkeyApple said:

Balls flying all over the place and someone sitting in the corner sobbing?

That made me laugh more than it probably should have done

Made me chuckle too....

[can't remember]

Shnozz said:

Most of them live a lifestyle that is hand to mouth

I think you could do with some basic anatomy lessons mate.

[Tuna]

Shnozz said:

I have only known one full on escort but count among my friends a number of strippers. It's very much the exception that any of them wisely invest their earnings. A few buy a house but that is about the extent of it and these days with fewer self-cert/make believe mortgages on the market even that is less common. Most of them live a lifestyle that is hand to mouth and country to country.

If you're the sort of person who can hang around with people for a thousand pounds plus a day, you're likely to be in the company of people who can actually advise you quite well on how to spend it.

On the other hand, if you're a stripper... perhaps not so much. Not to denigrate strippers, but their social life can't be that good. At least in terms of financial advice

[ApOrbital]

The Beaver King said:

DonkeyApple said:

I doubt they are truly both retired at 40. The basic maths of renting clunge out for say 20 years isn't going to yield enough net profit to finance 20-40 additional years of zero income. Even running a double revenue spot roast system on a near industrial scale is unlikely to yield the returns required. Unless the lifestyle is such that instead of being retired they are in fact unemployed jobseekers or had additional revenues?

PH: Where the economics of prostitution matters

haha

[Ari]

Tuna said:

If you're the sort of person who can hang around with people for a thousand pounds plus a day, you're likely to be in the company of people who can actually advise you quite well on how to spend it.

On the other hand, if you're a stripper... perhaps not so much. Not to denigrate strippers, but their social life can't be that good. At least in terms of financial advice

I think this is the issue many seem to struggle with. 'Sell sex = must be a crack we then'.

I'm no expert, but I suspect there are very many different levels, as with most businesses.

An Uber driver isn't going to earn as much as Lewis Hamilton, but on the face of it they both 'do the same job', they both drive a car for a living.

[Falsey]

Silent1 said:

xjay1337 said:

Falsey said:

Excuse me ladies, yes the flaps are all well and good, but could you hold some fingers up on camera so I can prove to the lads on the car forum that I am indeed with two other human females this weekend?

Pretty much.


If they're free spirited and up for the fun, I don't see why they would mind.

Is it really that amazingly unbelievable that his in an open relationship?
It's not as if he's claiming ownership of an MC12 and that he works for uber in it is he!

Not really important but I thought Id just add that we arent in an open relationship. Minor nitpicking of terms.

We are closed relationship with eachother but occasionally we play with other partners (as a couple). My girlfriend is comfortable with me seeing other people alone but its not something Im interested in right now.