Apostrophe'''''s, when did the rot set in?

Apostrophe'''''s, when did the rot set in?

Author
Discussion

Magic919

14,126 posts

201 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
roygarth said:
Agree. This thread is a good indicator of individuals business and moral compasses’. I would be very careful indeed if I was doing business with those who don’t, or perhaps can’t, see the ‘Dealers’ behaviour for what it is ie dodgy.

jamesson

2,990 posts

221 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
scubadude said:
Am searching patent office files now, it must include Pies, Piano's and Punto's surely...

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Sunday 7th February 2016
quotequote all
ianrb said:
Greg66 said:
ianrb said:
Should it not be "The sheeps' noses"?
No: the plural of sheep is sheep. Not sheeps.
Oddly I was aware of that.

To illustrate the point I am trying to make lets change it to "The sheep's legs", is that one or more sheep? Using "The sheeps' legs" provides that additional information.

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Sunday 7th February 2016
quotequote all
S93 said:
I can't believe someone took the effort to actually reverse park and thought they did a good job and just dumped it in this manner, beggar's belief

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Big Al. said:
Got the lappy today and it's currently being configured and files transferred from my old Lappy, Both new and old lappy run on Windows 10, if your saying that you've read that it wont run on W10 then I'll ship it back and get one that does.

tobinen

9,226 posts

145 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Ash4ord said:
I don't mind the tint's to be fair they are not super dark although some times in photo's they appear darker than they really are.

ATTAK Z

11,019 posts

189 months

Friday 12th February 2016
quotequote all
nicanary said:
Sally's campaign slogan - "Whistling the peoples' tune". laugh

....................................

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Sunday 14th February 2016
quotequote all
smashy said:
Ah whenever I come on here I meet clever trevor.Thats good ,no really excellant.

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Sunday 14th February 2016
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
Those Aston's and Ferrari's aren't going to be short on the power front.

tobinen

9,226 posts

145 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Mr Overheads said:
Tissot PRC200
Hamilton Khaki Field

Both Mechanical Automatic's.

Nik da Greek

2,503 posts

150 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
ATTAK Z said:
nicanary said:
Sally's campaign slogan - "Whistling the peoples' tune". laugh

....................................
Am I missing this one? confused

Is that not simply saying "Whistling the tune belonging to several groups of people"? It seems a perfectly acceptable plural possessive pronoun. Or would you prefer "people's", as in a tune belonging to a single group of people?

ATTAK Z

11,019 posts

189 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
People is the plural of person so the apostrophe goes before the S in both cases ... a bit like 'sheep's clothing' meaning the clothing of one sheep (singular) and the clothing of a few or many sheep (plural)

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
ATTAK Z said:
People is the plural of person so the apostrophe goes before the S in both cases ... a bit like 'sheep's clothing' meaning the clothing of one sheep (singular) and the clothing of a few or many sheep (plural)
Can, worms : http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...wink

ATTAK Z

11,019 posts

189 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I've attained my goal ... I've always wanted to be quoted by marshalla !

Nik da Greek

2,503 posts

150 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Except that "peoples" is an acceptable plural on its own, as in "the peoples of the west", in such an instance being a synonym for "races" or "tribes" or whatever demographic you wish to choose. "People" as a group noun would indicate all living humans irrespective of delineation or subdivision. Thus; all the tribes who live in the west - as opposed to; everyone who lives in the west. In the former, it would be peoples' and the latter would be people's

ATTAK Z

11,019 posts

189 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Yep now't wrong with that logic spin

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
Lynch91 said:
Wandering what peoples opinions are on it, mainly looking from an investment point of view.

jamesson

2,990 posts

221 months

Thursday 18th February 2016
quotequote all
Jimmyarm said:
well for small business'es it does

tobinen

9,226 posts

145 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
As to be the last of the real pilot hero's.

tobinen

9,226 posts

145 months

Monday 22nd February 2016
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
I know,I know,but it makes great comedy before bedtime reading about all these wives that think their husband's are going to be deported.