The return of 'Fat chicken kid'.

The return of 'Fat chicken kid'.

Author
Discussion

LukeBird

17,170 posts

210 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Original Poster said:
You actually called a child a "fking bellend"?

That is superb!!
+1 Superb!

roflrofl

southendpier

5,268 posts

230 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
LukeBird said:
Original Poster said:
You actually called a child a "fking bellend"?

That is superb!!
+1 Superb!

:rof
l+: rofl
seriously you all need to get a grip. the kid is not the problem. if you cannot see this then you need to think a lot harder.

if someone swore at your child what would you think?




Edited by southendpier on Thursday 5th August 00:34

southendpier

5,268 posts

230 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
snowy slopes said:
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
snowy slopes said:
southendpier said:
monthefish said:
southendpier said:
Do not equate disciplining children to beating them.
Do not equate a 'smack on the backside' to beating.

I was on receiving end of a smack on the backside (always from my mother as it happens) as a child. I would never class myself as having been beaten as a child.
How do you define it then? The action is to inflict pain so the kids does not do the act again. Would you "hit" your own kids?
I would define a beating as the child needing hospital treatment. Would i hit my own kids if i had any? No, but only because if i had any kids they would be a damn sight more well behaved than the average child in britain today, but if they were to step out of line, then a sharp smacking would be given to make sure they wouldnt do it again
Your wife reversed into another car in the supermarket car park. Accident, clumsy, she was silly, stupid, should have been paying attention she was mucking about laughing on teh phone to a mate. Naughty naughty. You've told her before about that, given her a warning.

You're in the car too. You get out and survey the damage, your irritated but reamin calm(ish). Punishment is needed so you decide to slap her, not hard enough to send her to hospital but just hard enough to let her know she did wrong. You explain that next time she should be more careful. She might cry a little, might have a red mark for a bit and she might get scared next time she does something wrong and wait for your reaction.

Next time she prangs the car it'll be OK to hit her twice as much or twice as hard?

That isn't ok is it?

BTW this is in no way having a go at you, I'm sure you are a great chap who of course would never hit their missus. Just throwing out an example for the discussion.

I find it amazing how many on PH shout from the roof tops THRASH THEM when anything happens involving children that they have never met!

Yet when you press them they then say "oh not beat them, just smack them you know in a calm and controlled way".
What the fk are you on about?

Adults learn by themselves, kids don't.

Reverse the situation. If she was in the car by herself she would have learned to not reverse into the car by herself without having an adult/superior telling her off. Would a child learn how to behave if they were left to their own devices?
Many children of the people ranting on here will be hit for say; scratching a car, kicking a football through a window, as much as they would for say oooh using words like fk. I was making the distinction of hitting people as a punishment. Did you not get it?

No one is saying that children should not be disciplined, learn to have respect and learn to behave.

Talking of behaviour, do you think it right that CVM (rather than do anything at the time) mouthed at the child when he left?
Yes, I did get that, but your example was st, that is about learning from mistakes.

A child scratching a car or putting a ball through a window will have done it on purpose or by mistake; if on purpose, the child should be punished accordingly.

You see where your argument is flawed, is basically what is wrong with this country, people burgle houses, they rob and steal from and even kill people. What punishment do they get? virtually none, they get stuck in prison for a few years, let out after half their term and they class it as being at a holiday camp these days.

If someone stole £500 from an old lady and they received a good flogging for it, I bet they'd think twice about doing it again, don't you?

What actually happens is they get a good stern telling off, oooooh that'll teach them, I bet they quiver in their boots while the big nasty judge man is standing there saying "Now don't do that again you naughty boy" whilst waving his finger.

And that is what everyone is talking about here, no need to kick seven shades of st out of the kid, but if he has stepped well out of line, give him a slap across the arse for it, he'll think twice about doing it again and he will get the picture instantly that what he has done was wrong.
Exactly. Here endeth the lesson
exactly here starts the lesson. You equate beatin children with scrotes doing bad stuff in adult society. Do you think all these kids were not hit by their parents. It made no difference.


To link a little child pushing to the front of a burger queue to the ills of society is pretty knee jerk pathetic.

WorAl

10,877 posts

189 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
snowy slopes said:
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
snowy slopes said:
southendpier said:
monthefish said:
southendpier said:
Do not equate disciplining children to beating them.
Do not equate a 'smack on the backside' to beating.

I was on receiving end of a smack on the backside (always from my mother as it happens) as a child. I would never class myself as having been beaten as a child.
How do you define it then? The action is to inflict pain so the kids does not do the act again. Would you "hit" your own kids?
I would define a beating as the child needing hospital treatment. Would i hit my own kids if i had any? No, but only because if i had any kids they would be a damn sight more well behaved than the average child in britain today, but if they were to step out of line, then a sharp smacking would be given to make sure they wouldnt do it again
Your wife reversed into another car in the supermarket car park. Accident, clumsy, she was silly, stupid, should have been paying attention she was mucking about laughing on teh phone to a mate. Naughty naughty. You've told her before about that, given her a warning.

You're in the car too. You get out and survey the damage, your irritated but reamin calm(ish). Punishment is needed so you decide to slap her, not hard enough to send her to hospital but just hard enough to let her know she did wrong. You explain that next time she should be more careful. She might cry a little, might have a red mark for a bit and she might get scared next time she does something wrong and wait for your reaction.

Next time she prangs the car it'll be OK to hit her twice as much or twice as hard?

That isn't ok is it?

BTW this is in no way having a go at you, I'm sure you are a great chap who of course would never hit their missus. Just throwing out an example for the discussion.

I find it amazing how many on PH shout from the roof tops THRASH THEM when anything happens involving children that they have never met!

Yet when you press them they then say "oh not beat them, just smack them you know in a calm and controlled way".
What the fk are you on about?

Adults learn by themselves, kids don't.

Reverse the situation. If she was in the car by herself she would have learned to not reverse into the car by herself without having an adult/superior telling her off. Would a child learn how to behave if they were left to their own devices?
Many children of the people ranting on here will be hit for say; scratching a car, kicking a football through a window, as much as they would for say oooh using words like fk. I was making the distinction of hitting people as a punishment. Did you not get it?

No one is saying that children should not be disciplined, learn to have respect and learn to behave.

Talking of behaviour, do you think it right that CVM (rather than do anything at the time) mouthed at the child when he left?
Yes, I did get that, but your example was st, that is about learning from mistakes.

A child scratching a car or putting a ball through a window will have done it on purpose or by mistake; if on purpose, the child should be punished accordingly.

You see where your argument is flawed, is basically what is wrong with this country, people burgle houses, they rob and steal from and even kill people. What punishment do they get? virtually none, they get stuck in prison for a few years, let out after half their term and they class it as being at a holiday camp these days.

If someone stole £500 from an old lady and they received a good flogging for it, I bet they'd think twice about doing it again, don't you?

What actually happens is they get a good stern telling off, oooooh that'll teach them, I bet they quiver in their boots while the big nasty judge man is standing there saying "Now don't do that again you naughty boy" whilst waving his finger.

And that is what everyone is talking about here, no need to kick seven shades of st out of the kid, but if he has stepped well out of line, give him a slap across the arse for it, he'll think twice about doing it again and he will get the picture instantly that what he has done was wrong.
Exactly. Here endeth the lesson
exactly here starts the lesson. You equate beatin children with scrotes doing bad stuff in adult society. Do you think all these kids were not hit by their parents. It made no difference.


To link a little child pushing to the front of a burger queue to the ills of society is pretty knee jerk pathetic.
And who said give a kid a slap for pushing a queue?

shirt

22,653 posts

202 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
southendpier - Google 'domestic discipline'. personally I'm all for it smile

pits

6,429 posts

191 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
I had the nightmare of going into Asda today, not my proffered store, Waitrose man myself, quick in and out for some Nesquik cereal as I had the hankering for some brown balls in my mouth fnarr fnarr. Briskly walking through to find the cereals, where I was only to find disappointment and rage at the lack of non Nestle cereal as I have gone of Kellogs, without being funny if I want Corn Flakes with some sugar I will buy Corn Flakes and add sugar, but I wanted Frosties only to get Corn Flakes with a mere pittance of sugar coated goodness with their new recipe, more like "lets be fking cheap skates and piss everyone off by being s"

After a bit of rage, I decided quickly pop around to the bakery and get some doughnuts, to find none, I blame this on the family of fatties, with 2 packs in their trolley the fat twunts, why do we allow these fatties to be so fat and repulsive, with their gelatinous offspring worbling around like fat tubs of jellified st.

I felt the red mist starting, as I was making a hasty exit before I raged, a gobby little piss brain had be unsecured outside of her containment seat in the food cart, when her vile mother and of course the obligatory grandmother, who just looks like the mother but fatter and you know she probably chain smokes through her vagina, were watching her ever so closely in the opposite aisle to the vermin, the little rat ran into a shelf face first.

Now perhaps the people around me may not have liked the fact that I had laughed, quite loudly whilst the creature was crying on the floor, her mother appeared and in her expert opinion declared the shelf dangerous that her unsupervised child had run into, the laughter stopped, the mist took over.

"How is that shelf dangerous exactly? Just because you can't keep that thing on a leash and it runs into something doesn't make it dangerous, it just means you have failed as a parent for not supervising your child, what do you suggest, we ban shelves and stack food on the floor? Or perhaps we bring in an IQ test before you are allowed to conceive then this would not have happened, because if you are dumb enough to think the shelf is at fault for your child running face first into it, then not even Jesus can help you."


Walked off, God I hate people, and I only laughed because it was funny and the child took the impact to the forehead, final nail in the coffin for Asda though, no Nesquik cereal, maddening.

shirt

22,653 posts

202 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
It's not just you, I almost always laugh at kids falling over, nesquik or not

Chill Winston

3,112 posts

190 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
I was at a wedding and a group of kids were playing on the grass. One horrible vacuous little ste decided that as a girl he was playing with wouldn't throw him the ball he'd slap her in the face. Hard. furious
The kid may only have been 10 but I told him that if he did it again I would slap him and see how he liked it. Child runs off to Mummy who then has a go at me for telling her child off. furious

The little fk spent the rest of the day hanging on his mother's hip sticking his tongue out at me until I made the 'I'll cut your fking throat' gesture across my neck with my finger and mouthed "fk you" at him. Wouldn't look at me after that biggrin

The parents are just as much to blame as thier horrible offspring.

TotalControl

8,089 posts

199 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
rofl Good rant CVM. Solid 9/10.

People need to learn to be able to control their kids. They need to understand that their brains are like a sponge, they will absorb the information given to them and act on that information later on. If the kid steps out of line, teach him/her that they were out of line. If my kids acted like Fat Chicken st then there would be issues with not just them, but me as well. Nothing wrong with a smack, no one here is saying that beating the daylights out of the kid is a good idea. It just makes sure the kids don't grow up to be complete oxygen wasters later on in life.

southendpier

5,268 posts

230 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
shirt said:
southendpier - Google 'domestic discipline'. personally I'm all for it smile
ooof. smile

cal72

7,839 posts

171 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
My son is 13 i have never had to and i have never had to hit/smack/punch/kick/throw/drive over/stick his head in a food blender or anything else.
At times when he was acting up i use to say pick a number between 1-10 he would pick a number then i would say Oh! dear that was the one that says sell games console and use cash to treat myself.(other times it was various stuff like staying at friends at weekends or making his least favourite food for the week)this really did work and the best was that every punishment was picked by him (or so he thought)and lasted longer than he would have liked.
after he had grown up some and was acting up a bit i use to say "Do you want to pick a number?) to which he immediatley turned into perfect child.

I do find that if you threaten to do something then you MUST follow it through or they will get the upper hand.

powwerr

1,978 posts

173 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
I know a few wee stes that i wouldnt mind giving the back of my upper hand to....
lets all just agree the parents are failures for having a fat kid. no excuse for overweight/obese kids.

and as a result of getting all the food he wants he probably gets everything else he wants aswell....no sky upstairs??? oh the shame!

fking bellend? I salute you caravan dude!......dont like caravans however shoot

sleep envy

62,260 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
Cara van Man said:
The disgusting little porkbelly then pushed the mountain of food into his well exercised jaws until most of it was gone before pushing his way to the front again. .
I've seen you eat - you're just jealous he's got sharper, pointier elbows than you

Cara van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

252 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
LukeBird said:
Original Poster said:
You actually called a child a "fking bellend"?

That is superb!!
+1 Superb!

:rof
l+: rofl
seriously you all need to get a grip. the kid is not the problem. if you cannot see this then you need to think a lot harder.

if someone swore at your child what would you think?




Edited by southendpier on Thursday 5th August 00:34
you seem to be very hung up on this.

If you read my post properly, you'll notice I 'mouthed the words' at him rather than bellow it in his face from inches away. I doubt he was intelligent enough to be able to lip read.

I merely made my post for amusement and to relate my amusing encounter with the little fat, wobbly legged spaz. You seem intent on turning the thread into a "anyone who says boo to a child is a serial abuser" thread.

That is all.

Cara van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

252 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Cara van Man said:
The disgusting little porkbelly then pushed the mountain of food into his well exercised jaws until most of it was gone before pushing his way to the front again. .
I've seen you eat - you're just jealous he's got sharper, pointier elbows than you
I dont think so! His elbows had cellulite wink

bonsai

2,015 posts

181 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
Southendpier - you have a naughty, fat child don't you?

monthefish

20,445 posts

232 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
WorAl said:
southendpier said:
snowy slopes said:
southendpier said:
monthefish said:
southendpier said:
Do not equate disciplining children to beating them.
Do not equate a 'smack on the backside' to beating.

I was on receiving end of a smack on the backside (always from my mother as it happens) as a child. I would never class myself as having been beaten as a child.
How do you define it then? The action is to inflict pain so the kids does not do the act again. Would you "hit" your own kids?
I would define a beating as the child needing hospital treatment. Would i hit my own kids if i had any? No, but only because if i had any kids they would be a damn sight more well behaved than the average child in britain today, but if they were to step out of line, then a sharp smacking would be given to make sure they wouldnt do it again
Your wife reversed into another car in the supermarket car park. Accident, clumsy, she was silly, stupid, should have been paying attention she was mucking about laughing on teh phone to a mate. Naughty naughty. You've told her before about that, given her a warning.

You're in the car too. You get out and survey the damage, your irritated but reamin calm(ish). Punishment is needed so you decide to slap her, not hard enough to send her to hospital but just hard enough to let her know she did wrong. You explain that next time she should be more careful. She might cry a little, might have a red mark for a bit and she might get scared next time she does something wrong and wait for your reaction.

Next time she prangs the car it'll be OK to hit her twice as much or twice as hard?

That isn't ok is it?

BTW this is in no way having a go at you, I'm sure you are a great chap who of course would never hit their missus. Just throwing out an example for the discussion.

I find it amazing how many on PH shout from the roof tops THRASH THEM when anything happens involving children that they have never met!

Yet when you press them they then say "oh not beat them, just smack them you know in a calm and controlled way".
What the fk are you on about?

Adults learn by themselves, kids don't.

Reverse the situation. If she was in the car by herself she would have learned to not reverse into the car by herself without having an adult/superior telling her off. Would a child learn how to behave if they were left to their own devices?
Many children of the people ranting on here will be hit for say; scratching a car, kicking a football through a window, as much as they would for say oooh using words like fk. I was making the distinction of hitting people as a punishment. Did you not get it?

No one is saying that children should not be disciplined, learn to have respect and learn to behave.

Talking of behaviour, do you think it right that CVM (rather than do anything at the time) mouthed at the child when he left?
Yes, I did get that, but your example was st, that is about learning from mistakes.

A child scratching a car or putting a ball through a window will have done it on purpose or by mistake; if on purpose, the child should be punished accordingly.

You see where your argument is flawed, is basically what is wrong with this country, people burgle houses, they rob and steal from and even kill people. What punishment do they get? virtually none, they get stuck in prison for a few years, let out after half their term and they class it as being at a holiday camp these days.

If someone stole £500 from an old lady and they received a good flogging for it, I bet they'd think twice about doing it again, don't you?

What actually happens is they get a good stern telling off, oooooh that'll teach them, I bet they quiver in their boots while the big nasty judge man is standing there saying "Now don't do that again you naughty boy" whilst waving his finger.

And that is what everyone is talking about here, no need to kick seven shades of st out of the kid, but if he has stepped well out of line, give him a slap across the arse for it, he'll think twice about doing it again and he will get the picture instantly that what he has done was wrong.
Agree.

lazyitus

19,926 posts

267 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
CVM, to be fair, I think it's well out of order mouthing 'fking bellend' at a child.

Next time, eat your kebab and stick the newly 'free of meat' skewer up the fat bds arse and watch him expire like a popped balloon.

Raise your game.

Edited by lazyitus on Thursday 5th August 09:35

Mazda Baiter

37,068 posts

189 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
monthefish said:
southendpier said:
Do not equate disciplining children to beating them.
Do not equate a 'smack on the backside' to beating.

I was on receiving end of a smack on the backside (always from my mother as it happens) as a child. I would never class myself as having been beaten as a child.
How do you define it then? The action is to inflict pain so the kids does not do the act again. Would you "hit" your own kids?
It is not to inflict pain. That is where all you limp wristed, labour voting, oedipus complexed weirdos go wrong. The "smack" is to shock. It is the shock which makes the child stop and think. If you are hurting the child then you are doing it wrong.

Oh, 9/10 CVM clap

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
snowy slopes said:
southendpier said:
monthefish said:
southendpier said:
Do not equate disciplining children to beating them.
Do not equate a 'smack on the backside' to beating.

I was on receiving end of a smack on the backside (always from my mother as it happens) as a child. I would never class myself as having been beaten as a child.
How do you define it then? The action is to inflict pain so the kids does not do the act again. Would you "hit" your own kids?
I would define a beating as the child needing hospital treatment. Would i hit my own kids if i had any? No, but only because if i had any kids they would be a damn sight more well behaved than the average child in britain today, but if they were to step out of line, then a sharp smacking would be given to make sure they wouldnt do it again
Your wife reversed into another car in the supermarket car park. Accident, clumsy, she was silly, stupid, should have been paying attention she was mucking about laughing on teh phone to a mate. Naughty naughty. You've told her before about that, given her a warning.

You're in the car too. You get out and survey the damage, your irritated but reamin calm(ish). Punishment is needed so you decide to slap her, not hard enough to send her to hospital but just hard enough to let her know she did wrong. You explain that next time she should be more careful. She might cry a little, might have a red mark for a bit and she might get scared next time she does something wrong and wait for your reaction.

Next time she prangs the car it'll be OK to hit her twice as much or twice as hard?

That isn't ok is it?

BTW this is in no way having a go at you, I'm sure you are a great chap who of course would never hit their missus. Just throwing out an example for the discussion.

I find it amazing how many on PH shout from the roof tops THRASH THEM when anything happens involving children that they have never met!

Yet when you press them they then say "oh not beat them, just smack them you know in a calm and controlled way".
You've just surpassed james_tigerwoods in the "most idiotic post" stakes.

Unfortunately, we could laugh at his one.