Interesting Wikipedia articles?
Discussion
9patch said:
Cindy James was a Canadian woman who disappeared in May 1989 and was found dead in the backyard of an abandoned house in the Richmond neighborhood near Vancouver, British Columbia two weeks later.
It says this one is up for deletion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_James
Surely it's obvious? The killer is now a Wikipedia moderator?!?It says this one is up for deletion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_James
HMHS Britannic. Titanics sister ship and the largest ship sunk in WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic
RMS Aquitania. Last four stacker passenger liner. Served in two world wars and service record of 37 years only beaten by the QE2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Aquitania
NelsonM3 said:
HMHS Britannic. Titanics sister ship and the largest ship sunk in WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic
RMS Aquitania. Last four stacker passenger liner. Served in two world wars and service record of 37 years only beaten by the QE2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Aquitania
According to that, the cost of Aquitania in modern Us dollars is $5.8 million.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic
RMS Aquitania. Last four stacker passenger liner. Served in two world wars and service record of 37 years only beaten by the QE2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Aquitania
No way in hell is that true
RobinBanks said:
NelsonM3 said:
HMHS Britannic. Titanics sister ship and the largest ship sunk in WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic
RMS Aquitania. Last four stacker passenger liner. Served in two world wars and service record of 37 years only beaten by the QE2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Aquitania
According to that, the cost of Aquitania in modern Us dollars is $5.8 million.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic
RMS Aquitania. Last four stacker passenger liner. Served in two world wars and service record of 37 years only beaten by the QE2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Aquitania
No way in hell is that true
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
Wing Commander said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
Not reallyA signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/05/mic...
DuckAvenger said:
Wing Commander said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
Not reallyA signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/05/mic...
Wing Commander said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
Enjoyed that. A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
Food for thought.
Wing Commander said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
wiki said:
In 2012, on the 35th anniversary of the Wow! signal, Arecibo Observatory beamed a response from humanity, containing 10,000 Twitter messages
Great, now aliens will know what Victoria Beckham got up to...Asterix said:
Wing Commander said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
A signal from space that, to this day, has an unknown source. Too neat and specific to likely be naturally generated, but comes from a part of space that has no planets.
Signal strength 30x more than background noise.
Quite interesting and makes you wonder!
wiki said:
In 2012, on the 35th anniversary of the Wow! signal, Arecibo Observatory beamed a response from humanity, containing 10,000 Twitter messages
Great, now aliens will know what Victoria Beckham got up to...Give ETs even more reason not to make contact. (Should any exist)
thismonkeyhere said:
Twitter FFS.
Give ETs even more reason not to make contact. (Should any exist)
I was thinking exactly the same thing, you have to wonder sometimes if 'they' should exist and have ability to get here and back to wherever they live, might just have popped in for a look, thought "fk that" and left again.Give ETs even more reason not to make contact. (Should any exist)
Lefty said:
"Where are they?!"I had the same thought when looking for fit birds in Cardiff.
Lefty said:
...and further related - http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/fermi-paradox.html#Another epic site.
Asterix said:
Wibble.Asterix said:
Lefty said:
...and further related - http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/fermi-paradox.html#Another epic site.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff