Interesting Wikipedia articles?

Interesting Wikipedia articles?

Author
Discussion

WreckedGecko

1,191 posts

201 months

Monday 22nd February 2016
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
My reading is that all of these planes are Air Force One, except they only have that name when the Prez is on board.
As I understand it Air Force One is a VC-25 where as the E-4 is a survivabity command post in case the Prez is killed.

So not specifically for the President.

Although if he was on board it would be by default AF1.

dudleybloke

19,819 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2016
quotequote all

Craiglamuffin

358 posts

180 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2016
quotequote all
Seek said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanis...

Complex clockwork mechanism dated to 200-100BC
My new favourite article. Amazing stuff!

glazbagun

14,279 posts

197 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2016
quotequote all

Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: "Do not march on Moscow".

Of course Napoleon had to find that out the hard way.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_invasion_of...


FredClogs

14,041 posts

161 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
Sunday marked the 100th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Verdun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Verdun

Quite astonishing levels of human waste, there seems to be little consensus on how many people died in this single 10 month battle, but it's estimated casualties could have been as high as 75,000 a month, but doubtless hundreds of thousands of young men would suffer the scars for the rest of their lives.

The Don of Croy

5,998 posts

159 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
Grab a shovel and book yourself a flight to Canada...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_Island#Pirate_tr...

glazbagun

14,279 posts

197 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes

Greek dude who worked at the Library of Alexandria and calculated the circumference of earth whilst never leaving egypt. 200 years before Christ. When you read about the ancient Greeks and Egyptians, you almost weep for the centuries of ignorance we lived in afterwards.

Squirrelofwoe

3,183 posts

176 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes

Greek dude who worked at the Library of Alexandria and calculated the circumference of earth whilst never leaving egypt. 200 years before Christ. When you read about the ancient Greeks and Egyptians, you almost weep for the centuries of ignorance we lived in afterwards.
yes

It's staggering isn't it. You look at the precision of the Great Pyramid- 0.5mm gaps between stones, and the base squared to 1/300th of a degree, and the fact it was the tallest building constructed until Lincoln Cathedral in around 1,300.

Then you realise they had the skill & knowledge of mathmatics to achieve that in around 2,500BC! yikes

Likewise with the Pharos (Lighthouse of Alexandria), and things like the Antikythera Mechanism (analogue computer to predict astrological positions).

All that skill and knowledge lost for hundreds if not thousands of years. It truly makes you appreciate why the Dark Ages were so named. It does make you wonder where we might be now had we continued on that upward curve and avoided the knowledge re-boot of the centuries that followed. frown

Negative Creep

24,977 posts

227 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Sunday marked the 100th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Verdun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Verdun

Quite astonishing levels of human waste, there seems to be little consensus on how many people died in this single 10 month battle, but it's estimated casualties could have been as high as 75,000 a month, but doubtless hundreds of thousands of young men would suffer the scars for the rest of their lives.
Certainly puts paid to the idea of the French not wanting to fight

RedLeicester

6,869 posts

245 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
FredClogs said:
Sunday marked the 100th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Verdun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Verdun

Quite astonishing levels of human waste, there seems to be little consensus on how many people died in this single 10 month battle, but it's estimated casualties could have been as high as 75,000 a month, but doubtless hundreds of thousands of young men would suffer the scars for the rest of their lives.
Certainly puts paid to the idea of the French not wanting to fight
It's more a case of them not wanting to fight since then. Look back at Marshal Petain (ultimately the leader of the Vichy regime, but heavily involved in Verdun) and the horrendous casualties at Verdun it's all too clear why they built the Maginot line and further that why when the Germans bypassed it the French basically capitulated as they couldn't face the concept of "another Verdun". Gross over simplification, but it's all there.

Squirrelofwoe

3,183 posts

176 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Sunday marked the 100th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Verdun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Verdun

Quite astonishing levels of human waste, there seems to be little consensus on how many people died in this single 10 month battle, but it's estimated casualties could have been as high as 75,000 a month, but doubtless hundreds of thousands of young men would suffer the scars for the rest of their lives.
It's difficult to comprehend the scale of it. The idea of tens of thousands of soldiers losing their lives, sometimes in a single day- particularly in today's society where every individual UK casualty suffered makes the headlines. Back then many of the losses would simply be a statistic, the chance of recovering & identifying every casualty was an impossibility- see the vast numbers listed as 'MIA', inevitably changed to KIA as time passed. frown

Squirrelofwoe

3,183 posts

176 months

Wednesday 24th February 2016
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
The driving force behind Dreadnought was Admiral Fisher who had started his naval career on board HMS Victory - as in Nelson's flagship at Trafalgar.
Another point that highlights just how rapidly technology progressed during that time- he joined a navy comprised of wooden ships of the line and left it around 60 years later in a time of battleships and aircraft carriers.

Contrast it to the relatively small progress that happened over the preceding couple of centuries- for example HMS Victory herself was already 40 years old by the time of Trafalgar in 1805 having been launched in 1765, and was actually laid down only a few months after Nelson was born!

In addition to her physical age (although she had been extensively rebuilt) she was in effect at least a 100 year old design at the time of her most famous action, yet was still one of the most capable ships available.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather_even...

this interesting, especially the Historic consequences section re Islam.

thatsprettyshady

1,824 posts

165 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Squirrelofwoe said:
FredClogs said:
Sunday marked the 100th anniversary of the start of the Battle of Verdun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Verdun

Quite astonishing levels of human waste, there seems to be little consensus on how many people died in this single 10 month battle, but it's estimated casualties could have been as high as 75,000 a month, but doubtless hundreds of thousands of young men would suffer the scars for the rest of their lives.
It's difficult to comprehend the scale of it. The idea of tens of thousands of soldiers losing their lives, sometimes in a single day- particularly in today's society where every individual UK casualty suffered makes the headlines. Back then many of the losses would simply be a statistic, the chance of recovering & identifying every casualty was an impossibility- see the vast numbers listed as 'MIA', inevitably changed to KIA as time passed. frown
I remember as a kid being dragged around the old forts whist on holiday, at the time i didn't appreciate the sheer scale of it all but looking back it was just endless graves, endless destruction and still a lot of evidence of the fighting... bombholes everywhere.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_and_Clark_Expe...

this is interesting. I know this was 200 years ago and people perhaps didn't understand geography well, but to believe you could basically travel up one major river from the Atlantic side of the States, and get to its head, and then you'd find the another head to a major river that flowed the other way all the way to the pacific, seems like incredulous wishful thinking to me. Juts the whole 'Rocky Mountains' ranges separating them.

Interesting to read about the Louisiana Purchase too. France sells the whole of the central region of the continental America to the newly formed country 'United States' so that Napoleon Bonaparte could fund an invasion of Britain, which never occurred. Not a great financial deal either.

AstonZagato

12,700 posts

210 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
I used to work with a direct descendant of Meriwether Lewis (he was also named Meriwether Lewis - but everyone called him Sambo). Hilarious chap.

Project C

739 posts

205 months

Saturday 27th February 2016
quotequote all
You thought your designer sunglasses were exclusive?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxottica

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 28th February 2016
quotequote all
Perfect example of how a brand add value. Basically something made for peanuts and sold for 100x more.

FredClogs

14,041 posts

161 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all

dudleybloke

19,819 posts

186 months

Tuesday 8th March 2016
quotequote all