Geek Jokes

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Morningside

24,110 posts

230 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
toasty said:
AVV EM said:
MartG said:
laugh, very good.
Are they eyebrows? This may be a whoosh moment for me.
Aircraft wings.

toasty

7,482 posts

221 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
Ah OK, I was stuck on Roger Moore's eyebrows and couldn't see anything else.

TheInternet

4,718 posts

164 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
toasty said:
Ah OK, I was stuck on Roger Moore's eyebrows and couldn't see anything else.
You silly nit.

glenrobbo

35,282 posts

151 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
Morningside said:
Aircraft wings.
Nope, they are aerofoil sections.
An aerofoil made from the one on the left would generate lift in an airflow, much increased at a small positive angle of attack.
Good for an aircraft wing profile, or could be used inverted to increase downforce as per a rear spoiler on a performance car.

The one on the right, having uniform upper and lower surface profiles, would generate no lift at all at 0 degrees angle of attack, and relatively little at a small angle of attack.

Edited by glenrobbo on Wednesday 30th November 15:08

ChemicalChaos

10,397 posts

161 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Morningside said:
Aircraft wings.
Nope,they are aerofoil sections.
The one on the left would generate lift in an airflow, much increased at a small positive angle of attack.

The one on the right, having uniform upper and lower surface profiles, would generate no lift at all at 0 degrees angle of attack, and relatively little at a small angle of attack.
Yes, although the symmetrical aerofoil on the right can fly at a greater range of angles of attack without boundary layer separation or spin-stall. The one on the left looks like a laminar flow profile for steady level flight in transonic regions

glenrobbo

35,282 posts

151 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
Absolutely, the RH section also incurs much less drag.

At supersonic speeds, things become more complicated as some aerodynamic laws reverse and completely different aerofoil shapes are required to maintain lift, minimize drag and buffeting from shockwaves.

It would be easier to demonstrate using a sacrificial parrot...

Or some nice fresh young kittens.

Edited by glenrobbo on Wednesday 30th November 15:34

ClockworkCupcake

74,595 posts

273 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
It would be easier to demonstrate using a sacrificial parrot...
But first let us consider a spherical parrot in a vacuum...


Morningside

24,110 posts

230 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
ClockworkCupcake said:
glenrobbo said:
It would be easier to demonstrate using a sacrificial parrot...
But first let us consider a spherical parrot in a vacuum...
Got to be said...plane on a conveyor belt? (sorry!)

ClockworkCupcake

74,595 posts

273 months

Wednesday 30th November 2016
quotequote all
Morningside said:
Got to be said...plane on a conveyor belt? (sorry!)
It would shave the surface of the conveyor belt until it either wore through or the blade became blunt, I would imagine.

MartG

20,685 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
Every cloud has a silver lining - except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Morningside said:
Aircraft wings.
Nope, they are aerofoil sections.
An aerofoil made from the one on the left would generate lift in an airflow, much increased at a small positive angle of attack.
Good for an aircraft wing profile, or could be used inverted to increase downforce as per a rear spoiler on a performance car.

The one on the right, having uniform upper and lower surface profiles, would generate no lift at all at 0 degrees angle of attack, and relatively little at a small angle of attack.

Edited by glenrobbo on Wednesday 30th November 15:08
So....wings then wink

Dogwatch

6,229 posts

223 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Nope, they are aerofoil sections.
An aerofoil made from the one on the left would generate lift in an airflow, much increased at a small positive angle of attack.
Good for an aircraft wing profile, or could be used inverted to increase downforce as per a rear spoiler on a performance car.

The one on the right, having uniform upper and lower surface profiles, would generate no lift at all at 0 degrees angle of attack, and relatively little at a small angle of attack.

Edited by glenrobbo on Wednesday 30th November 15:08
Thanks for that. I recognised they were wing profiles, OK, aerofoils, but didn't know what the working difference was.

If the one on the left is for performance cars then presumably the one on the right is ideal for your barried Saxo. smile

ChemicalChaos

10,397 posts

161 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
Dogwatch said:
Thanks for that. I recognised they were wing profiles, OK, aerofoils, but didn't know what the working difference was.

If the one on the left is for performance cars then presumably the one on the right is ideal for your barried Saxo. smile
Other way round - see my explanation above. The laminar flow wing will most likely be found on an airliner, whereas the symmetrical basic aerofoil will most likely be attached to a stunt plane.

A "supercar" wing - ie one for a supersonic fighter jet - looks totally different due to the way that supersonic shockwaves work:


droopsnoot

11,958 posts

243 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
toasty said:
Ah OK, I was stuck on Roger Moore's eyebrows and couldn't see anything else.
I thought they were eyebrows as well, though not specifically Mr Moore's.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

245 months

Thursday 1st December 2016
quotequote all
droopsnoot said:
toasty said:
Ah OK, I was stuck on Roger Moore's eyebrows and couldn't see anything else.
I thought they were eyebrows as well, though not specifically Mr Moore's.
That's Sir Roger to you, peon.



wink

Muntu

7,635 posts

200 months

Monday 5th December 2016
quotequote all

ChemicalChaos

10,397 posts

161 months

Monday 5th December 2016
quotequote all
If you say a number loudly enough its value increases.

5 = 5

5! = 120

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
If you say a number loudly enough its value increases.

5 = 5

5! = 120
I just stole that one, and got told it doesn't work - it failed on the first two numbers my BIL tried frown


1! = 1
2! = 2



pincher

8,569 posts

218 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
McAndy said:
toasty said:
Are they eyebrows? This may be a whoosh moment for me.
An ironic whoosh, too, as they're aerofoils. smile
Did he leave them in the strip club?

















I'm sure someone will get it wink

IN51GHT

8,782 posts

211 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED