Geek Jokes

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Lord Pikey

3,257 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all

McAndy

12,449 posts

177 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
hehe

tribbles

3,974 posts

222 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Should've added Xordroid, Xnordroid (nexordroid?) and Bufferdroid smile

MartG

20,676 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all


Seriously !

"George" was named by it's discoverer Herschel in honour of George III. It wasn't popular and Uranus, the father of Saturn in Roman mythology, was eventually settled upon.

Caruso

7,436 posts

256 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
MartG said:


Seriously !

"George" was named by it's discoverer Herschel in honour of George III. It wasn't popular and Uranus, the father of Saturn in Roman mythology, was eventually settled upon.
Let's hope the head of Walmart EMEA Regional Branding does not see this.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Lord said:
Very good, 10/10

Fer

7,710 posts

280 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Lord said:
Very good, 10/10
1010/1010, Shirley?

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Fer said:
xRIEx said:
Lord said:
Very good, 10/10
1010/1010, Shirley?
Only if you think I wasn't already making a binary joke.

Fer

7,710 posts

280 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Fer said:
xRIEx said:
Lord said:
Very good, 10/10
1010/1010, Shirley?
Only if you think I wasn't already making a binary joke.
10 types of people...

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Fer said:
xRIEx said:
Fer said:
xRIEx said:
Lord said:
Very good, 10/10
1010/1010, Shirley?
Only if you think I wasn't already making a binary joke.
10 types of people...
Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.

MartG

20,676 posts

204 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all

singlecoil

33,598 posts

246 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
MartG said:
That'll be me then, Gul Dukat was a very interesting character, the one on the right looks like a pouting idiot, and I have every reason to believe that's exactly what she is.

james_tigerwoods

16,287 posts

197 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
MartG said:
That'll be me then, Gul Dukat was a very interesting character, the one on the right looks like a pouting idiot, and I have every reason to believe that's exactly what she is.
I preferred Garak - A truly multi layered character smile

LordGrover

33,539 posts

212 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
"No hotlinking allowed from <some dodgy site about makeup for men obviously>"

singlecoil

33,598 posts

246 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
james_tigerwoods said:
singlecoil said:
MartG said:
That'll be me then, Gul Dukat was a very interesting character, the one on the right looks like a pouting idiot, and I have every reason to believe that's exactly what she is.
I preferred Garak - A truly multi layered character smile
I do too. I particularly liked the episode in which he gained Worf's respect by overcoming his claustrophobia.

Civpilot

6,235 posts

240 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
james_tigerwoods said:
singlecoil said:
MartG said:
That'll be me then, Gul Dukat was a very interesting character, the one on the right looks like a pouting idiot, and I have every reason to believe that's exactly what she is.
I preferred Garak - A truly multi layered character smile
I do too. I particularly liked the episode in which he gained Worf's respect by overcoming his claustrophobia.
<geek mode>

I have a Star Trek Novel about Garak called "A Stitch in Time" written by Andrew J. Robinson (who the geeks will know played Garak). I've never read the book, I only bought it as it is actually signed by him biggrin

ps. Although reading some online reviews it actually sounds like a pretty good read so might have to open it.

This is not a Trek novel for the action hungry, techno-solution [fans]. This is a wonderful examination of a (relatively) minor character from Deep Space Nine by the actor who played him. It suggests to me that Andrew Robinson spent far too much of his free time obsessing about his alter ego and that is no bad thing! I must admit to only knowingly having seen Robinson as Garak and as Scorpio in the original Dirty Harry. The power he brings to those performances is clearly a result of having a pre-defined mental picture of them. Within the TV series Garak has been left ambiguous by the writers and that is a great strength, but it has also allowed Robinson to take a character (who is never likely to be handled again in TV/Film trek) and give us the background and reality of the character as he sees him - and who can contradict that? Suddenly all the characteristics, mannerisms and nuances that only an actor can bring to a character (rather than being written for the actor) snap into focus. I would wager that Robinson has being building this book since the first time he read for the part of Garak...and didn't even know it. This is not a cash-in, Robinson obviously cares about his creation, but equally it is not a easy book to read. The authors style is firmly autobiographical...and if you struggle with such a books in the real world you would be forgiven for having trouble with this. Nor is the plotline up to much as a typical Trek adventure story, but then it does not have to be. This is not a grand adventure...find a problem, kill the bad guy, solve the problem trek novel. It is a wonderful character study and I doubt that even those who played a character every episode for seven or more years could match this knowledge of the alter-ego. If you are intrigued by Garak buy this. If you see him as a bit part player of no real consequence or just want a adventure story then this is not for you...though you could try it and find you love it. If you are saying "who's Garak?" don't even bother. Personally this was the first Trek novel I had read in over 5 years and on the strength of it I went and read other new ones. Only to be disappointed. This is, in my humble opinion, within the top five novels from any TV/Film franchise I have ever read and that includes alot of competition, much of it tripe, some of it good and rare works - such as this - excellent. The only thing I am sorry for is that it is doubtful that Robinson will never get a character (in any show) that will offer such scope for his talents and allow another step into the literary world of such quality.

mister_ee

347 posts

182 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
simonrockman said:
Hmm, I used to know Don Davidge reasonably well. Not seen him for years. He'd just joined HP to do Palm WebOS stuff.
WebOS, ho ho, how's that working out for him?

schmunk

4,399 posts

125 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
mister_ee said:
simonrockman said:
Hmm, I used to know Don Davidge reasonably well. Not seen him for years. He'd just joined HP to do Palm WebOS stuff.
WebOS, ho ho, how's that working out for him?
Fairly well, it seems....

Mannginger

9,062 posts

257 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I liked this one from SMBC



TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED