Fastest to burn 1000calories challenge

Fastest to burn 1000calories challenge

Author
Discussion

nick s

1,368 posts

217 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
How are people burning 1000 cals in 45 mins>! I absolutely killed myself at spinning. 50 mins flat out, sweat pouring everywhere with my HR staying above 165bpm and i only did 600 cals?! I'm 6"2 and 88kgs aswell so should be more than that?
I only burn about 750 on a hard 10k run with my heart rate at 175bpm+ in 45 mins aswell!

BarryGibb

335 posts

147 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
nick s said:
How are people burning 1000 cals in 45 mins>! I absolutely killed myself at spinning. 50 mins flat out, sweat pouring everywhere with my HR staying above 165bpm and i only did 600 cals?! I'm 6"2 and 88kgs aswell so should be more than that?
I only burn about 750 on a hard 10k run with my heart rate at 175bpm+ in 45 mins aswell!
Does the machine measure watts as well?

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
nick s said:
How are people burning 1000 cals in 45 mins>! I absolutely killed myself at spinning. 50 mins flat out, sweat pouring everywhere with my HR staying above 165bpm and i only did 600 cals?! I'm 6"2 and 88kgs aswell so should be more than that?
I only burn about 750 on a hard 10k run with my heart rate at 175bpm+ in 45 mins aswell!
Cals burned is not about performance particularly but about effort.Run your 10k uphill and take 2 mins longer and you'll burn more.

Spinning doesn't use enough large muscle groups.


nick s

1,368 posts

217 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
Right i see. I'll give that a go then!!

I'm using a Garmin Forerunner 310xt with an HR monitor, so should be pretty accurate i guess? Better than the gym equipment? How would a treadmill know how much you've burned if it can't track your heart rate?

E38Ross

35,084 posts

212 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
nick s said:
Right i see. I'll give that a go then!!

I'm using a Garmin Forerunner 310xt with an HR monitor, so should be pretty accurate i guess? Better than the gym equipment? How would a treadmill know how much you've burned if it can't track your heart rate?
exactly. it doesn't know how efficient you are with your running style either

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
E38Ross said:
nick s said:
Right i see. I'll give that a go then!!

I'm using a Garmin Forerunner 310xt with an HR monitor, so should be pretty accurate i guess? Better than the gym equipment? How would a treadmill know how much you've burned if it can't track your heart rate?
exactly. it doesn't know how efficient you are with your running style either
Unless a O2/CO2 test is conducted the standard is bodyweight/distance/speed.Heartrate is a measure of how hard your heart is working and not energy used.





otolith

56,146 posts

204 months

Saturday 18th February 2012
quotequote all
Interesting paper here looking at estimating energy expenditure from heart rate.

BarryGibb

335 posts

147 months

Saturday 18th February 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
Interesting paper here looking at estimating energy expenditure from heart rate.
Will have to have a read, but my first thought it how it can be accurate. When I used to row for fun, I held a split for 5k of around 2:00, which equates to 200W, now I'm > 300W. I would estimate my body composition, resting heart rate etc haven't changed too much.

goldblum

10,272 posts

167 months

Saturday 18th February 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
Interesting paper here looking at estimating energy expenditure from heart rate.
Heartrate is controlled by the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system,not withstanding the myogenic nature of the myocardia itself which has its own

pacemaker,the SA node.

Heartrate,other than the SA node,has neural,intrinsic and hormonal influences which pass to either the VCC or CCC,which message the para/sympathetic nervous system

to decrease/increase heartrate in turn.

In short therefore,your heartrate is influenced by a great deal more than the muscular need for oxygen.

For instance before you even start exercise adrenalin is released which raises HR;a hot day? HR increases.




"The energy requirements of physical activity are calculated by measuring or estimating the oxygen requirements of the amount of exercise or activity being

performed,commonly called the oxygen consumption (VO2).Under steady-state conditions,VO2 provides a measure of the energy cost of exercise (kcal) and in

combination with VCO2 can provide information about the fuels for exercise."


ACSM (2006).Metabolic calculations:Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription.(7ed).(pp286-299).Philadelphia: Lippincott,Williams & Wilkins.



The actual measurement of VO2 typically is performed in exercise laboratories or clinical settings using a procedure called 'open circuit spirometry'.

Oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide output (VCO2) are measured.Inter subject variability can have an SEE (standard error of estimate) as high as 7%.


Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

166 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
43:11 mins

Davey S2

13,096 posts

254 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Efbe said:
43:11 mins
Looks like it's taken you well over 2 years hehe

BoRED S2upid

19,704 posts

240 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Shame it has to be a machine as I don't have access to any. Squash burns a load of calories pretty damn quickly.

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

166 months

Friday 5th September 2014
quotequote all
40:02

MacGee

2,513 posts

230 months

Saturday 6th September 2014
quotequote all
I've heard the calls on the machines way over estimates the work done. Some geeky rowers calced calls for different paces on the erg. For me at sub 2 min pace I'd need to pull for an hour at least to burn 1k calls.

Efbe

Original Poster:

9,251 posts

166 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
MacGee said:
I've heard the calls on the machines way over estimates the work done. Some geeky rowers calced calls for different paces on the erg. For me at sub 2 min pace I'd need to pull for an hour at least to burn 1k calls.
yeah completely agreed. there is no way on earth I am burning 100calories in 40 mins. Halving it would probably not even be close.

But it does provide a comparison between machines and each visit smile

VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Efbe said:
43:11 mins
Nice thread bump.

In the past when I have compared a polar HR monitor vs the machines at the gym I always get a much lower reading from the HR monitor - sometimes less than half. I think the machines overestimate or are just setup to make people feel good. It is very hard to burn 1000 calories, let alone in 1 hour... I'm amazed anyone can do an hour of pure cardio in the gym anyway, it is absolutely mind numbing.

IMO anyone looking to lose weight should be focusing on diet 90% of the time.

M400 NBL

3,529 posts

212 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
VolvoT5 said:
Nice thread bump.

In the past when I have compared a polar HR monitor vs the machines at the gym I always get a much lower reading from the HR monitor - sometimes less than half. I think the machines overestimate or are just setup to make people feel good. It is very hard to burn 1000 calories, let alone in 1 hour... I'm amazed anyone can do an hour of pure cardio in the gym anyway, it is absolutely mind numbing.

IMO anyone looking to lose weight should be focusing on diet 90% of the time.
Cardio isn't always about just losing weight.

VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Monday 15th September 2014
quotequote all
M400 NBL said:
Cardio isn't always about just losing weight.
I didn't say it was. But given the thread is talking about burning X calories I assumed most people were trying to burn fat, otherwise why they be so interested in the number of calories burned.... if you are just training for fitness or pleasure there are a lot better ways to measure performance than calories burned.

Plus I would stand by my statement whether weight loss was the goal or not. I believe most of it comes down to diet.... eat junk and you will most likely feel and look crap.

Edited by VolvoT5 on Monday 15th September 20:33

M400 NBL

3,529 posts

212 months

Tuesday 16th September 2014
quotequote all
VolvoT5 said:
I didn't say it was. But given the thread is talking about burning X calories I assumed most people were trying to burn fat, otherwise why they be so interested in the number of calories burned.... if you are just training for fitness or pleasure there are a lot better ways to measure performance than calories burned.

Plus I would stand by my statement whether weight loss was the goal or not. I believe most of it comes down to diet.... eat junk and you will most likely feel and look crap.

Edited by VolvoT5 on Monday 15th September 20:33
I'd have thought that the people posting in this thread are already very fit, and so don't need to or want to lose weight. I totally agree that eating properly will help to lose weight and help with exercise, but cardiovascular exercises are often done to increase fitness. People trying lose weight would probably be aiming for 1000 cals in a week not in a session.