The Supplement Science thread
Discussion
mattikake said:
LostBMW said:
Is it just me being subconsciously cynical, but does his face say "HGH" to anyone? Just something about it that doesn't look 'right'?
lol I was thinking the exact same thing. He looks 35yo. Easy. A healthy 35, but 35 nonetheless.Oh those Russains.
One of the dietary supplements that interests me is nitrate.
Beetroots get most of the blurb, but celery, lettuce and spinach are high as well.
http://www.ptonthenet.com/articles/Beetroot-juice-...
Beetroots get most of the blurb, but celery, lettuce and spinach are high as well.
http://www.ptonthenet.com/articles/Beetroot-juice-...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990615
Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
ringerz said:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990615
Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
Hmmm... 40g a day? But Glutamic acid is abundant in all sources of protein. If you eat 140g of chicken you must surely have easily consumed 40g of Glutamic acid with it.Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
"GLN shares the transporters with other amino acids" this is the key thing. Overload on one AA and you limit your ability to take on others, like Valine, Leucine and Isoleucine.
I guess they just talking L-Glutamine already hydrolised.
mattikake said:
ringerz said:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990615
Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
Hmmm... 40g a day? But Glutamic acid is abundant in all sources of protein. If you eat 140g of chicken you must surely have easily consumed 40g of Glutamic acid with it.Nice list of sides for Glutamine, lots a st for debatable benefits.
"GLN shares the transporters with other amino acids" this is the key thing. Overload on one AA and you limit your ability to take on others, like Valine, Leucine and Isoleucine.
I guess they just talking L-Glutamine already hydrolised.
Has anyone on here who takes in a large amount of protein on a daily basis (a level well in excess of stated norms or needs) experienced any issues with acidosis et cetera? I've never been as consistently high as several posters describe, let alone bodybuilders - rarely above 200g and often around 100g day - yet my doctor is convinced that the gout I suffered from is largely down to protein metabolism etc.
When my levels are higher then I do notice differences, e.g colouration of urine, symptoms of arthritis and gout presented and so on, especially if my water intake is low, which it often is.
He doubts alcohol is the cause but I know from lots of experience that that must be the main culprit, so have been teetotal since late 2009.
muon said:
Dude, 22 and looking like that? Even if he had god-like genetics, trained HARD since he was 16 and had a ridiculously good diet, I don’t think he’d look like that. Whatever it is, it isn’t natural. I’m not hating at all as that’s what some people aspire to look like, ‘whatever’ it takes.
As you say, his face doesn’t look like he’s 22, but I would eat my own arm off if he’s natural.
Another question is, could ANYONE look like that naturally? Probably yes, but I would have thought it would take longer than however long he has been training properly for and it would be a 1 in a million chance. Only my opinion mind you.
The thing is, if you make something your job… career.. sport… way to earn a living, then you would be stupid NOT to take any PED’s if you can get away with it.
People want to see monsters. Hence why WSM don’t test for anabolics either.
No one looking like that or even remotely close (at any age) will be natural. Pretty much no one is natty anymore. Even fitness/magazine cover models have nearly all used gear in some shape or form.As you say, his face doesn’t look like he’s 22, but I would eat my own arm off if he’s natural.
Another question is, could ANYONE look like that naturally? Probably yes, but I would have thought it would take longer than however long he has been training properly for and it would be a 1 in a million chance. Only my opinion mind you.
The thing is, if you make something your job… career.. sport… way to earn a living, then you would be stupid NOT to take any PED’s if you can get away with it.
People want to see monsters. Hence why WSM don’t test for anabolics either.
The general public are BREATHTAKINGLY naive about steroids. All top rugby players use steroids/GH (just look at the jawlines on some of them!) along with all top athletes in pretty much every physically demanding discipline. This is fact and to assume otherwise is laughably naive. Sorry have gone off on a tangent...just a wee rant to no one in particular!
HonestIago said:
No one looking like that or even remotely close (at any age) will be natural. Pretty much no one is natty anymore. Even fitness/magazine cover models have nearly all used gear in some shape or form.
The general public are BREATHTAKINGLY naive about steroids. All top rugby players use steroids/GH (just look at the jawlines on some of them!) along with all top athletes in pretty much every physically demanding discipline. This is fact and to assume otherwise is laughably naive. Sorry have gone off on a tangent...just a wee rant to no one in particular!
'Roid rage?The general public are BREATHTAKINGLY naive about steroids. All top rugby players use steroids/GH (just look at the jawlines on some of them!) along with all top athletes in pretty much every physically demanding discipline. This is fact and to assume otherwise is laughably naive. Sorry have gone off on a tangent...just a wee rant to no one in particular!
Bicarbonate of soda effects on running.
http://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles/scni9a5.htm
Beetroot juice.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23640589
http://www.runnersworld.com/nutrition-for-runners/...
http://www.brianmac.co.uk/articles/scni9a5.htm
Beetroot juice.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23640589
http://www.runnersworld.com/nutrition-for-runners/...
Edited by Halb on Tuesday 11th March 18:50
What's the current advice on cycling Creatine and BCAA's?
Obviously Google is my friend but, as usual, thought it best to keep knowledge within PH.
I've cycled Creatine twice since the beginning of the year but stayed on BCAA's throughout, but current "wisdom" suggests you don't need to cycle, as they are naturally occurring. My PT suggests cycling BCAA's every 12 weeks.
Thoughts?
Obviously Google is my friend but, as usual, thought it best to keep knowledge within PH.
I've cycled Creatine twice since the beginning of the year but stayed on BCAA's throughout, but current "wisdom" suggests you don't need to cycle, as they are naturally occurring. My PT suggests cycling BCAA's every 12 weeks.
Thoughts?
Halb said:
Digger said:
When the ZMA's arrived I noticed I had an MP jar with plenty of zinc and magnesium capsules, so I've been using up some of those. I'll start with the ZMA's next week now you've reminded me.
Did you reply to this earlier? Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff