Had a headache since 8th June!
Discussion
NJK44 said:
FlyingMeeces said:
essayer said:
NJK44 said:
Went from 179lbs to 132lbs and I'm 6ft 
Still got another 40lbs to lose!
Wait, what?? Please tell me you mean kgStill got another 40lbs to lose!
And you want to lose another 40 more, putting you at 6ft and 6 and a half stone?
Either you've got your maths or typing wrong, or you've got a much bigger problem than a persistent headache. Professional cyclists, who are the leanest bunch of fit and well people you'll ever encounter, range at 6ft between around 85 kg (Marcel Kittel, world class sprinter, muscles are heavy) down to about 65 kg (Chris Froome and his ilk).
92 lbs would be 40 kg, and a BMI that would get you immediately admitted to hospital. It'd be courting heart failure.
I really hope I've just spectacularly misunderstood somewhere along the line.
FlyingMeeces said:
You are now 132 lb, about 9 and a half stone, yes?
And you want to lose another 40 more, putting you at 6ft and 6 and a half stone?
Either you've got your maths or typing wrong, or you've got a much bigger problem than a persistent headache. Professional cyclists, who are the leanest bunch of fit and well people you'll ever encounter, range at 6ft between around 85 kg (Marcel Kittel, world class sprinter, muscles are heavy) down to about 65 kg (Chris Froome and his ilk).
92 lbs would be 40 kg, and a BMI that would get you immediately admitted to hospital. It'd be courting heart failure.
I really hope I've just spectacularly misunderstood somewhere along the line.
I think I want to be 200lbs and then put on muscle. And you want to lose another 40 more, putting you at 6ft and 6 and a half stone?
Either you've got your maths or typing wrong, or you've got a much bigger problem than a persistent headache. Professional cyclists, who are the leanest bunch of fit and well people you'll ever encounter, range at 6ft between around 85 kg (Marcel Kittel, world class sprinter, muscles are heavy) down to about 65 kg (Chris Froome and his ilk).
92 lbs would be 40 kg, and a BMI that would get you immediately admitted to hospital. It'd be courting heart failure.
I really hope I've just spectacularly misunderstood somewhere along the line.
NJK44 said:
FlyingMeeces said:
You are now 132 lb, about 9 and a half stone, yes?
And you want to lose another 40 more, putting you at 6ft and 6 and a half stone?
Either you've got your maths or typing wrong, or you've got a much bigger problem than a persistent headache. Professional cyclists, who are the leanest bunch of fit and well people you'll ever encounter, range at 6ft between around 85 kg (Marcel Kittel, world class sprinter, muscles are heavy) down to about 65 kg (Chris Froome and his ilk).
92 lbs would be 40 kg, and a BMI that would get you immediately admitted to hospital. It'd be courting heart failure.
I really hope I've just spectacularly misunderstood somewhere along the line.
I think I want to be 200lbs and then put on muscle. And you want to lose another 40 more, putting you at 6ft and 6 and a half stone?
Either you've got your maths or typing wrong, or you've got a much bigger problem than a persistent headache. Professional cyclists, who are the leanest bunch of fit and well people you'll ever encounter, range at 6ft between around 85 kg (Marcel Kittel, world class sprinter, muscles are heavy) down to about 65 kg (Chris Froome and his ilk).
92 lbs would be 40 kg, and a BMI that would get you immediately admitted to hospital. It'd be courting heart failure.
I really hope I've just spectacularly misunderstood somewhere along the line.
100 is too light, you don't have a starting point of no muscle at all unless you totally run your body into the ground- that's not weight control, it's starvation. The weight you're at now is a very decent starting point - on the significantly low side of the spectrum - for getting stronger and fitter. What sort of muscle do you want to end up with - endurance athlete, sprinter, rock climbing??
FlyingMeeces said:
Typo?
100 is too light, you don't have a starting point of no muscle at all unless you totally run your body into the ground- that's not weight control, it's starvation. The weight you're at now is a very decent starting point - on the significantly low side of the spectrum - for getting stronger and fitter. What sort of muscle do you want to end up with - endurance athlete, sprinter, rock climbing??
Nothing like that, just stronger tbh. I'm not 100% sure I want just yet. 100 is too light, you don't have a starting point of no muscle at all unless you totally run your body into the ground- that's not weight control, it's starvation. The weight you're at now is a very decent starting point - on the significantly low side of the spectrum - for getting stronger and fitter. What sort of muscle do you want to end up with - endurance athlete, sprinter, rock climbing??
NJK44 said:
lol it was pounds. 279lbs on 22nd February, and 132lbs end of May!
Dont worry all, he put a typo at the start. Unless he has lost 10 stone in 3 months 
He is now 232lbs, and wants to get to 200lbs and then put on muscle.
270's to 230's is 3.5stone lost.
40 more lbs would be a pretty good goal.
Edited by p1stonhead on Thursday 28th July 06:58
p1stonhead said:
Dont worry all, he put a typo at the start. Unless he has lost 10 stone in 3 months
He is now 232lbs, and wants to get to 200lbs and then put on muscle.
270's to 230's is 3.5stone lost.
40 more lbs would be a pretty good goal.
Ah sh*t. I didn't realise I put 179! FfsHe is now 232lbs, and wants to get to 200lbs and then put on muscle.
270's to 230's is 3.5stone lost.
40 more lbs would be a pretty good goal.
Edited by p1stonhead on Thursday 28th July 06:58
Yeah sorry, what this guy said! ^
NJK44 said:
p1stonhead said:
Dont worry all, he put a typo at the start. Unless he has lost 10 stone in 3 months
He is now 232lbs, and wants to get to 200lbs and then put on muscle.
270's to 230's is 3.5stone lost.
40 more lbs would be a pretty good goal.
Ah sh*t. I didn't realise I put 179! FfsHe is now 232lbs, and wants to get to 200lbs and then put on muscle.
270's to 230's is 3.5stone lost.
40 more lbs would be a pretty good goal.
Edited by p1stonhead on Thursday 28th July 06:58
Yeah sorry, what this guy said! ^
thank f
k for that, you were really worrying me! Yeah okay nice one and crack on, but maybe if you can, slow down the weight loss or even go for maintenance while you sort the headaches? No technical thinking behind it, just wondering if reducing the variables might help!
FlyingMeeces said:
thank fk for that, you were really worrying me! Yeah okay nice one and crack on, but maybe if you can, slow down the weight loss or even go for maintenance while you sort the headaches? No technical thinking behind it, just wondering if reducing the variables might help!
NJK44 said:
FlyingMeeces said:
thank fk for that, you were really worrying me! Yeah okay nice one and crack on, but maybe if you can, slow down the weight loss or even go for maintenance while you sort the headaches? No technical thinking behind it, just wondering if reducing the variables might help!
NJK44 said:
I was on the diet, and had barely any headaches. The diet provided me with what I needed during the day and I never felt hungry or any lack of energy.
Since I stopped the diet and been eating normally, I've had headaches.
I think you should go and see a doctor as you seem confused in addition to your headaches. It could be something completely unrelated to what you are eating and drinking and a checkup can't do any harm.Since I stopped the diet and been eating normally, I've had headaches.
I was suffering with a weird fluctuating sensation in my left eye and at least 8 migraine attacks a month, and I mean true migraines I finally tracked it down to drinking lime juice cordial There is an additive in it which can cause headaches etc Stopped taking it and been fine for months
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff