how fast can you row 2000 metres ?

how fast can you row 2000 metres ?

Author
Discussion

dtmpower

3,972 posts

245 months

Friday 16th August 2013
quotequote all
Rower is taking pride of place in the garage, only done a few small warm up rows, first proper 30 mins was just outside my best gym pace. Hope to break the 7 mins for 2000m and 19 mins for 5000m soon.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Anyone here doing the inaugural Shrewsbury Mile on Sunday?

1,609m rowed as fast as you can.

And then a little later, and apparently for "fun", some of us are going to be trying a 100m sprint. Which is probably the hardest thing to do on an erg. I just can't get the start right.

dtmpower

3,972 posts

245 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
clonmult said:
Which is probably the hardest thing to do on an erg. I just can't get the start right.
I start fully coiled up near the fan unit - then do several explosive arm only pulls.

Vladimir

6,917 posts

158 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
I got 1m34s for a 500m the other day which was hard for me but probably rubbish. I do very little rowing though.

mattnunn

14,041 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
I got 1m34s for a 500m the other day which was hard for me but probably rubbish. I do very little rowing though.
Pretty impressive if you ask me, check out the wiki

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
I got 1m34s for a 500m the other day which was hard for me but probably rubbish. I do very little rowing though.
Concept 2 website, just looked at the various times posted for the 2014 season.

1m34 would put you at 320th. In the world. Across all ages/weights/genders. Out of 1,366. Top quarter of the active rowers in the world so far this season. Thats pretty good.

Saw a chap down the gym a few weeks back. Reasonably tall, early 20s. Going for it on the erg. And to say he was fast is an understatement. His partner mentioned that he occasionally used to row for his uni, but he didn't really care for it.

Apparently he used to do a 400m row in just under 1 minute. That is 1m15 500m pace. Which would be amongst the best rowers in the world. But he just wants to play golf ....

MacGee

2,513 posts

230 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
its the last 100m what knackers you.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
MacGee said:
its the last 100m what knackers you.
And the first 400 are easy!!

Bit of a mixed result for the mile on sunday - its being organised by your speed rather than age/weight. So I'm not up against Jason Hewitt. All of my competitors are 10 years older than me ....

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
clonmult said:
Anyone here doing the inaugural Shrewsbury Mile on Sunday?

1,609m rowed as fast as you can.

And then a little later, and apparently for "fun", some of us are going to be trying a 100m sprint. Which is probably the hardest thing to do on an erg. I just can't get the start right.
Brother did it, he said he won his category by 20 seconds. Just asked how fast he rows 2000 meters, he said 6.47. Good, bad, indifferent?

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
clonmult said:
Anyone here doing the inaugural Shrewsbury Mile on Sunday?

1,609m rowed as fast as you can.

And then a little later, and apparently for "fun", some of us are going to be trying a 100m sprint. Which is probably the hardest thing to do on an erg. I just can't get the start right.
Brother did it, he said he won his category by 20 seconds. Just asked how fast he rows 2000 meters, he said 6.47. Good, bad, indifferent?
Oooh, who's your brother? Sub 7 on the 2k is definitely good.

I did a stupid fly and die on the mile - went out way too hard, got an early lead - adrenaline got the better of me. Legs were shot with 1k still to go. Still managed 5:36.7, beaten to second by half a flippin' second.

100m was fun; think I may have actually won that one by a tenth.

MacGee

2,513 posts

230 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
what was your 100m time?

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
MacGee said:
what was your 100m time?
It was dire. 18.1, think Planky was behind me at 18.2.

In training I've been putting in 17.1 secs (repeatedly). So it really was horribly slow, but everyone had tired legs from the mile.

I should have stayed to watch the relay, it was apparently mad.

MacGee

2,513 posts

230 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
indeed...the 100m is explosive power and if you'd given it all for the mile then no way could you perform well in it!

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
MacGee said:
indeed...the 100m is explosive power and if you'd given it all for the mile then no way could you perform well in it!
I've yet to get under 17 secs - your sub 16 is seriously impressive!

Whilst I royally screwed my mile (should have gone out at 1:45 pace, then slowly sped up), I do now know I can do a sub 7 2k.

Some major leg work coming up in the next few weeks smile

Vladimir

6,917 posts

158 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all

clonmult said:
Concept 2 website, just looked at the various times posted for the 2014 season.

1m34 would put you at 320th. In the world. Across all ages/weights/genders. Out of 1,366. Top quarter of the active rowers in the world so far this season. Thats pretty good.

Saw a chap down the gym a few weeks back. Reasonably tall, early 20s. Going for it on the erg. And to say he was fast is an understatement. His partner mentioned that he occasionally used to row for his uni, but he didn't really care for it.

Apparently he used to do a 400m row in just under 1 minute. That is 1m15 500m pace. Which would be amongst the best rowers in the world. But he just wants to play golf ....
Wow; I had nothing to compare it to! I might try again; while not tall, I have been training hard (especially upper body) in others ways for two decades. Time to try again...

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
clonmult said:
MacGee said:
indeed...the 100m is explosive power and if you'd given it all for the mile then no way could you perform well in it!
I've yet to get under 17 secs - your sub 16 is seriously impressive!

Whilst I royally screwed my mile (should have gone out at 1:45 pace, then slowly sped up), I do now know I can do a sub 7 2k.

Some major leg work coming up in the next few weeks smile
When I was still rowing - never did any competitive indoor stuff as it was purely a means to an end for us - we used to start fast and then drop into race pace. We would over-rate and not push too hard and slowly build the effort applied and drop the rating down to race pace. You need to do this to get the fan quickly up to speed.

The key to a good time is practising your final build phase to death. You need to be able to work out at what distance you can start to build rating AND effort and when you can nudge them up again, and again, and again, etc. To do this you really need work out what your anaerobic threshold is so you can hang on to the last stroke. As you get fitter this will change so you need to keep tabs on where the threshold is.

One final thing that is often overlooked - especially by big strong lads - is getting the shoulders completely forward on the catch. Big lads tend to keep their shoulders square so when they hit the catch their shoulders roll forward losing 5-8 inches of stroke distance. It may not sound like much, but it's a big loss when you're chasing 10ths. So make sure on the catch that the shoulders are as far forward as you can get them, so that when you apply leg pressure there is no 'give' in the system.






Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
If you can do X distance in Y time indoors, what will your time be on the water?

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
If you can do X distance in Y time indoors, what will your time be on the water?
It doesn't work like that as rowing on water is really rather difficult. Imagine a tug of war on a tight rope and you'll get the idea - the winning crew is the one that can pull hard AND still stay on the tight-rope.


omgus

7,305 posts

175 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
So considering i have spent the last few months with rowing as my main cardio in the gym i cannot believe that:
a) i didn't notice there was a rowing thread.
b) how much slower i am than some of you lot of those distances. frown


Currently tending to stick to 5k in about 21-23minutes, 7k i can consistently manage times below 33mins and the one 10k i have rowed was about 48minutes.

I think i need to work on my 2k times as 8 minutes seems to be very slow compared with some of you.

dtmpower

3,972 posts

245 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
omgus said:
I think i need to work on my 2k times as 8 minutes seems to be very slow compared with some of you.
I wouldn't bother working on the 2000m times, I found much better progress doing intervals or longer (slower paced) rows.